312.0
STPOCPP
CH
Art. 392 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Ausdehnung gutheissender Rechtsmittelentscheide
StPO; 9. Titel: Rechtsmittel; 1. Kapitel: Allgemeine Bestimmungen
Art. 392 StPO · Ausdehnung gutheissender Rechtsmittelentscheide
Haben nur einzelne der im gleichen Verfahren beschuldigten oder verurteilten Personen ein Rechtsmittel ergriffen und wird dieses gutgeheissen, so wird der angefochtene Entscheid auch zugunsten jener aufgehoben oder abgeändert, die das Rechtsmittel nicht ergriffen haben, wenn: a. die Rechtsmittelinstanz den Sachverhalt anders beurteilt; und b. ihre Erwägungen auch für die anderen Beteiligten zutreffen.
Die Rechtsmittelinstanz hört vor ihrem Entscheid wenn nötig die beschuldigten oder verurteilten Personen, die kein Rechtsmittel ergriffen haben, die Staatsanwaltschaft und die Privatklägerschaft an.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (137)
P/19914/2021 · ge (art. 392 al. 1 CPP)
Public Prosecutor's Office v. Appellant (Cannabis Trafficking Costs and Indemnity)
Used to justify extending the annulment of the challenged orders (concerning costs and compensation) to the non-appealing co-defendant B______.
CR.2025.2 (Art. 392 StPO)
Revision Denied: Co-Defendant's Acquittal Not Irreconcilable Contradiction Under Swiss Law
This provision was mentioned in the context of a request for extension of a previous judgment, which was subsequently rejected.
CA.2024.34 (Art. 392 StPO)
Federal Criminal Court Rules on Costs for Acquitted Defendant
Cited in relation to B.'s request for an extension of the Federal Court's judgment.
CA.2024.2 (art. 392 CPP)
Forgery Conviction Sentence Reduced Under *Lex Mitior* Principle
Cited as the legal basis for the second instance court's review of the case following the Federal Tribunal's ruling.
4P 24 10 · lu (Art. 392 StPO)
Denial of Extension of Favorable Appellate Ruling to Waived Appeal Due to Lack of Contrary Factual Finding
The application for extension of the favorable appeal decision was rejected because the prerequisite under Art. 392 para. 1 lit. a StPO (a factual finding different from the lower court) was not met.
OG.2022.00065 · gl (Art. 392 Abs. 1 Bst. a StPO)
Driver Acquitted: Speed Limit Signage Deemed Legally Insufficient
Used to instruct the authorities to re-evaluate all pending or already decided charges based on the new legal assessment.
P/14730/2018 · ge (Art. 392 al. 1 CPP)
Prosecutor's Dismissal of Negligence Case and Cost Allocation Overturned
Applied to extend the effect of the admitted appeal to the non-appealing party (E_____ SA).
CPEN.2022.73 · ne (Art. 392 CPP)
COVID-19 Gathering Limit Violation and Dismissal of Premises Operation Charges
Applied by analogy to release defendants C. and B. from charges for which the appellants were acquitted.
SK 2022 462 · be (Art. 356 Abs. 7 i.V.m. Art. 392 StPO)
Public Incitement to Violence: Extension of Acquittal Denied
Used to state that the application for extension of the favorable decision was denied.
SK 2022 463 · be (Art. 356 Abs. 7 i.V.m. Art. 392 StPO)
Cantonal High Court Denies Extension of Acquittal in Incitement Case Based on Related Protest Facts
The primary decision points address the rejection of the application for extension of a favorable decision based on these articles.
P1 20 76 · vs (art. 392 al. 1 CPP)
Appeals Regarding Nightclub Assault Convictions
Mentioned as context for the admissibility of the legal qualification of 'voies de fait' concerning the prohibition of reformatio in pejus, but not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders 4-15.
SK 2022 23 · be (art. 392 CPP)
Appeal Against Aggression Conviction Despite Acquittal for Robbery
Cited regarding the finality of parts of the decision not challenged, which is a condition for reviewing only the contested points.
BS 2021 93 · zg (Art. 392 Abs. 1 StPO)
Appeal Against Imposition of Procedural Costs in Terminated Criminal Investigation
This provision was used to determine whether the reversal of the cost allocation against the appellant should automatically apply to the other accused parties, which the court decided against.
SB210449 · zh (Art. 392 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO)
Robbery Conviction Upheld; Deportation Order Maintained
This procedural rule was considered when assessing the civil claims in the appeal, noting the disposition principle applies.
SB210449 · zh (Art. 392 Abs. 2 StPO)
Robbery Conviction Upheld; Deportation Order Maintained
This procedural rule was considered as the court could not deviate to the detriment of the defendant since only the defendant appealed the civil claims.