312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 388 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Zuständigkeit der Verfahrensleitung für verfahrensleitende und vorsorgliche Massnahmen sowie Nichteintretensentscheide
StPO; 9. Titel: Rechtsmittel; 1. Kapitel: Allgemeine Bestimmungen
Art. 388 StPO · Zuständigkeit der Verfahrensleitung für verfahrensleitende und vorsorgliche Massnahmen sowie Nichteintretensentscheide
Die Verfahrensleitung der Rechtsmittelinstanz trifft die notwendigen und unaufschiebbaren verfahrensleitenden und vorsorglichen Massnahmen. Sie kann namentlich: a. die Staatsanwaltschaft mit unaufschiebbaren Beweiserhebungen beauftragen; b. die Haft anordnen; c. eine amtliche Verteidigung bestellen.
Sie entscheidet über das Nichteintreten auf: a. offensichtlich unzulässige Rechtsmittel; b. Rechtsmittel, die offensichtlich keine hinreichende Begründung enthalten; c. querulatorische oder rechtsmissbräuchliche Rechtsmittel.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (274)
BGE 151 IV 330 (Art. 388 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO)
Security Detention Extension in Appellate Proceedings on Therapeutic Measure Review: Ex Officio Authority and No Mandatory Time Limit Under Swiss Criminal Procedure.
Grounds for the appellate court's competence to extend existing security detention during the appeals process.
BG.2026.35 (Art. 388 Abs. 2 lit. b StPO)
Appellant's Combined Prosecution Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Specificity and Valid Grounds
Used to decide that the appeal will not be considered.
BB.2025.107 (Art. 388 Abs. 2 lit. b StPO)
Appeal Dismissed for Failure to State Grounds Against Prosecutor's Decision
Cited for the procedural decision to be made by a single judge.
BB.2025.124 (Art. 388 Abs. 2 lit. c StPO)
Abuse of Office Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Deficiencies and Vexatious Conduct
The single judge decided not to enter into the appeal based on this provision.
BB.2026.7 (Art. 388 Abs. 2 lit. c StPO)
Attorney General's Refusal to Investigate Upheld Amidst Vexatious Appeals
Cited as the basis for the single judge's decision not to enter into the merits of the appeal.
BB.2026.28 (art. 388 al. 2 CPP)
Recusal Requests of Federal Prosecutor Dismissed for Lack of Grounds
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible due to manifestly insufficient motivation and to declare the recusal requests irreceivable by a single judge without exchange of written pleadings.
BB.2026.33 (Art. 388 al. 2 CPP)
Federal Criminal Court Dismisses Inadmissible Appeal Due to Insufficiency
Used to issue a decision of non-entry into the appeal by a single judge due to manifestly insufficient motivation.
BB.2026.9 (Art. 388 al. 2 CPP)
Federal Prosecutor's Office vs. Federal Court and Cantonal Commercial Registry: Appeal Dismissed
Used by the single judge to declare the appeal inadmissible due to manifest lack of substantiation.
BB.2026.5 (Art. 388 al. 2 CPP)
Federal Court Decisions Not Subject to Criminal Review
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible due to manifest lack of merit.
BG.2026.9 (Art. 388 al. 2 CPP)
Federal Criminal Court: Appeal on Jurisdiction Inadmissible Due to Failure to Exhaust Prior Remedies
Cited as the legal basis for the unique judge to decide not to enter into the merits of manifestly inadmissible appeals.
BB.2026.3 (Art. 388 al. 2 CPP)
Country's Appeal of Dismissal Ruling Declared Moot
Used to strike the appeal from the court roll because the case had become moot.
CN.2025.20 (Art. 388 al. 1 let. b CPP)
Defendant's Flight Risk Justifies Continued Detention Pending Appeal
Cited as part of the legal basis for the appellate court's jurisdiction over pre-trial detention.
BB.2026.1 (art. 388 al. 2 CPP)
Criminal Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing
Allows a single judge to rule on the inadmissibility of the appeal.
BG.2025.86 (art. 388 al. 2 let. b CPP)
Jurisdiction upheld despite procedural challenge.
Used to declare the appeal manifestly inadmissible due to insufficient motivation.
BB.2025.114 (Art. 388 Abs. 2 lit. a StPO)
Late Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Proof of Incapacity and Lack of Criminal Suspicion
This provision allows a single judge to decide on an appeal, which was the basis for the court's decision.