312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 377 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Verfahren
StPO; 8. Titel: Besondere Verfahren; 5. Kapitel: Selbstständige Massnahmeverfahren
Art. 377 StPO · Verfahren
Gegenstände oder Vermögenswerte, die voraussichtlich in einem selbstständigen Verfahren einzuziehen sind, werden beschlagnahmt.
Sind die Voraussetzungen für die Einziehung erfüllt, so ordnet die Staatsanwaltschaft die Einziehung in einem Einziehungsbefehl an; sie gibt der betroffenen Person Gelegenheit zur Stellungnahme.
Sind die Voraussetzungen nicht erfüllt, so verfügt sie die Einstellung des Verfahrens und gibt die Gegenstände oder Vermögenswerte der berechtigten Person zurück.
Das Einspracheverfahren richtet sich nach den Bestimmungen über den Strafbefehl. Ein allfälliger Entscheid des Gerichts ergeht in Form eines Urteils. Der Entscheid des Gerichts kann mit Berufung angefochten werden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)
BB.2025.31 (art. 377 al. 4 CPP)
Defendant's Appeal on Costs and Compensation Allowed in Money Laundering Case
Cited in the context of comparing appeal procedures for confiscation.
BK 2024 356 · be (Art. 377 Abs. 4 i.V.m. Art. 356 Abs. 5 StPO)
Cantonal Court Upholds Asset Forfeiture Annulment in Standalone Proceeding Due to Prior Criminal Case
Cited as the legal basis for revoking the confiscation order when the conditions for a distinct confiscation procedure are not met.
AK.2024.404.AK · sg (Art. 377 Abs. 4 StPO)
Confiscation of Cocaine-Contaminated Cash Despite Absence of Criminal Conviction
This procedural provision was cited at the beginning of the decision as context regarding the appeal procedure for confiscation in independent proceedings, although the current case involved confiscation within a discontinuation.
OG.2019.00054 · gl (Art. 377 Abs. 1 StPO)
Cannabis Seizure Upheld Despite Personal Use Threshold
This provision was used to justify the legality of the initial seizure of the cannabis.
BK 2019 211 · be (Art. 377 Abs. 1 StPO)
Company Appeal Against Seizure of Equipment Used in Narcotics Offense
Cited as the legal basis for the seizure, but not explicitly in the final dispositive orders (1-4).
BK 2019 169 · be (Art. 377 StPO)
Prosecutor's Indication of Confiscation, Not Immediately Appealable
Cited in the reasoning section as the correct legal remedy (objection) against a final confiscation order.
D.cision.2018.378 · vd (Art. 377 al. 3 CPP)
Appeal Against Confiscation Order for Rental Income Following Double Murder Conviction
Cited in the context of the appellant claiming restitution of the seized assets based on this provision.
UH150097 · zh (Art. 377 Abs. 1 StPO)
Prosecutor's Asset Freeze Upheld Amid Misappropriation Investigation
This article is cited in relation to the seizure of assets to enforce a substitute claim, relevant to the confiscation of assets.
PS/27/2010 · ge (art. 377 CPP)
Detainee's Appeal for Early Transfer to Open Facility Denied
Used to find the appeal admissible as it was filed according to the prescribed form and deadline.
PS/28/2010 · ge (art. 376 et 377 du Code de procédure pénale, du 29 septembre 1977 ; CPP– RS E 4 20)
Appellant v. Sentence and Measures Enforcement Service (Forced Acceleration of Substitute Custodial Sentence)
Cited to confirm the admissibility of the appeal based on formal requirements and deadlines.
UH150097 · zh (Art. 377 Abs. 2 letzter Satz StPO)
Zurich Court Upholds Freeze on Bank Account Linked to Attorney Fraud
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the right of the affected persons to comment before a confiscation order is issued by the Public Prosecutor's Office.
UH150097 · zh (Art. 377 Abs. 4 StPO)
Zurich Court Upholds Freeze on Bank Account Linked to Attorney Fraud
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the rules governing opposition proceedings against a confiscation order.