Art. 376 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Voraussetzungen

RR.2025.11 (art. 376 CPP)

Algeria v. Banking Documents Request Appeal Dismissed

Cited in relation to confiscation proceedings, relevant to the reasoning that leads to the dispositive.

SK.2022.15 (Art. 376 e segg. CPP)

Confiscation of Swiss Bank Account Funds Linked to Criminal Organization Upheld

Governs independent confiscation procedures.

BK 2020 440 · be (Art. 376 ff. StPO)

Federal Customs Administration v. Forfeiture of Drug-Contaminated Vehicle and Secret Compartment

The decision itself concerns a self-standing confiscation proceeding governed by these articles.

OG.2019.00054 · gl (Art. 376 ff. StPO)

Cannabis Seizure Upheld Despite Personal Use Threshold

These provisions were referenced as the legal framework for the independent confiscation procedure.

BK 2018 79 · be (Art. 376 ff. StPO)

Supreme Court Overturns Accessory Confiscation During Partial Suspension of Fraud Investigation

Cited in the Regeste as the provisions governing the independent confiscation procedure, which the Tribunal suggested as the correct alternative to the unlawful accessory confiscation during suspension.

2017.OG.BI.17 · ur (Art. 376 Abs. 3 lit. a StPO)

Appeal Against Cost Assessment Due to Authority's Procedural Fault

The reference cited here seems to be a typo in the text provided for the dispositive section of the decision summary (the main text mentions Art. 426 Abs. 3 lit. a StPO, which is the operative rule). Given that the actual dispositive mentioned in point 3 refers to costs, Art. 426 Abs. 3 lit. a StPO is the substantive rule applied, and the other listed procedural rules are cited in the reasoning supporting the main order (point 3). I will stick to the explicit citation in the final order structure provided in the text.

60.2016.217 · ti (Art. 376 CPP)

Appellant Consent to Evidence Destruction vs. Search Seizure Challenge

The court explicitly refers to this article in the concluding pronouncement regarding the procedure for anticipatory destruction of seized hemp.

AK.2015.320 · sg (Art. 376 ff. StPO)

Logistics Provider Non-Liability in Seized Mail Case and Forfeiture Jurisdiction

Cited as the legal basis for the separate confiscation procedure, which the court noted was not locally competent in this case.

AK.2015.320 · sg (Art. 376 ff. StPO)

Logistics Provider Criminal Proceedings Non-Initiation Upheld; Forfeiture Precluded.

Cited as the basis for the possibility of an independent confiscation procedure, which the court found necessary but not within its jurisdiction.

BB.2015.77 (art. 376 e segg. CPP)

Confiscation of Assets Linked to Mafia Association upheld

Cited as the legal basis for the independent confiscation procedure.

D.cision.2015.21 · vd (Art. 376 CPP)

Seizure and Confiscation of Marijuana Cultivation Equipment

Cited in the context of determining the correct procedure for ordering confiscation and destruction.

60.2011.337 · ti (art. 376 ss. CPP)

Appeal Against Partial Confiscation Reversal Due to Procedural Irregularities

Cited in the preamble as the provision governing the procedure under which the appeal was lodged, although the decision ultimately annulled the lower court's ruling based on procedural flaws.

PS/27/2010 · ge (art. 376 CPP)

Detainee's Appeal for Early Transfer to Open Facility Denied

Used to find the appeal admissible as it was filed according to the prescribed form and deadline.

PS/28/2010 · ge (art. 376 et 377 du Code de procédure pénale, du 29 septembre 1977 ; CPP– RS E 4 20)

Appellant v. Sentence and Measures Enforcement Service (Forced Acceleration of Substitute Custodial Sentence)

Cited to confirm the admissibility of the appeal based on formal requirements and deadlines.

PS/13/2009 · ge (Art. 376 CPP)

Appellant v. Service Regarding Ordinary Detention Based on Health Issues

Cited as the basis for the receivability of the appeal and establishing the competence of the Court of Justice.