312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 374 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Voraussetzungen undVerfahren
StPO; 8. Titel: Besondere Verfahren; 5. Kapitel: Selbstständige Massnahmeverfahren
Art. 374 StPO · Voraussetzungen undVerfahren
Ist eine beschuldigte Person schuldunfähig und kommt eine Anwendung der Artikel 19 Absatz 4 oder 263 StGB nicht in Betracht, so beantragt die Staatsanwaltschaft dem erstinstanzlichen Gericht schriftlich eine Massnahme nach den Artikeln 59–61, 63, 64, 67, 67 b oder 67 e StGB, ohne vorher das Verfahren wegen Schuldunfähigkeit einzustellen.
Das erstinstanzliche Gericht kann mit Rücksicht auf den Gesundheitszustand oder zum Schutz der Persönlichkeit der beschuldigten Person: a. in Abwesenheit der beschuldigten Person verhandeln; b. die Öffentlichkeit von den Verhandlungen ausschliessen.
Es gibt der Privatklägerschaft Gelegenheit, sich zum Antrag der Staatsanwaltschaft und zu ihrer Zivilklage zu äussern.
Im Übrigen gelten die Bestimmungen über das erstinstanzliche Hauptverfahren.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (45)
BK 2014 341 · be (Art. 374 Abs. 3 StPO)
Victim's Right to Legal Aid in Assault Case Despite Accused's Alleged Lack of Culpability
The Appellant's right to comment on the psychiatric assessment was invoked based on this provision.
P/19944/2023 · ge (art. 374 al. 1 CPP)
Public Prosecutor's Refusal to Permit Early Outpatient Treatment Upheld
This provision was cited to explain that it is the duty of the trial court (Tribunal correctionnel) to decide on the most appropriate measure for the defendant, not the Chamber of Appeal.
SK 2024 89 · be (Art. 374 f. StPO)
Absolving of Culpability Due to Severe Mental Disorder with Order for Long-Term Therapeutic Confinement
Cited in the dispositive (II.2) regarding procedural rules applied by the lower court, confirmed in the appeal.
P/19808/2019 · ge (art. 374 CPP)
Public Prosecutor v. Dismissal of Defamation and Threats Proceedings Due to Unassessed Mental Incapacity
Mentioned in relation to measures to be taken in case of irresponsibility, discussed in the context of classification.
P/19808/2019 · ge (art. 374 s. CPP)
Public Prosecutor v. Dismissal of Defamation and Threats Proceedings Due to Unassessed Mental Incapacity
Referenced as an alternative to art. 299 CPP for closing the procedure when diminished responsibility is suspected but not fully established.
P/21367/2021 · ge (Art. 374 CPP)
Appellant v. State (Moral Damages for Pre-Trial Detention and Security Custody)
Cited in the confirmed dispositive section of the judgment concerning the finding of facts in the context of irresponsibility.
460.22.84 · bl (Art. 350 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 374 Abs. 4 StPO)
State v. [Defendant Name]: Affirming Commitment for Inability to Stand Trial and Threatening Authorities
These articles relate to the scope of the indictment and the motion for a measure.
460.22.84 · bl (Art. 374 f. StPO)
State v. [Defendant Name]: Affirming Commitment for Inability to Stand Trial and Threatening Authorities
These articles relate to the ordering of measures.
P/13755/2020 · ge (Art. 374 CPP)
Revision of Penalty Orders Based on Subsequent Finding of Total Irresponsibility
This provision concerns the procedure applicable when the defendant is found to be irresponsible, which is the outcome of the revision.
SB210229 · zh (Art. 374 f. StPO)
Improper Joinder of Standard Indictment and Unfitness Proceeding Reversal
The mixed procedure used by the Prosecutor's Office was deemed inadmissible under current case law, leading to the reversal of the lower court's decision and the case being sent back for retrial according to the considerations, which involved this procedure type.
Jug.2021.182 · vd (art. 374 ss CPP)
State v. Appellant (Attempted Murder/Irresponsibility/Treatment Facility Placement)
Cited in the basis for the final decision, procedural rules governing the appeal procedure.
72.2020.59 · ti (art. 374 CPP)
State v. Defendant (Psychotic Episode Resulting in Assault)
The court applied this procedural article for ordering a measure against a criminally incapable person who requires treatment, as proposed by the Public Prosecutor.
SK 2016 308 · be (Art. 374 StPO)
Coercion Conviction Overturned Due to Irresponsibility from Schizophrenia; Outpatient Treatment Rejected
Applied in conjunction with other rules regarding the costs allocation for the proceedings concerning the measure.
SK 2018 475 · be (Art. 374 StPO)
Swiss Appellate Court Upholds Indefinite Custodial Treatment for Criminally Incapable Offender
Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis for imposing the measure and adjudicating costs.
P/25315/2018 · ge (art. 374 al. 1 CPP)
Applicant v. State on Continued Provisional Detention for Public Alarming and Threats
Cited regarding the procedure for requesting a measure for an unaccountable defendant instead of a penalty.