312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 368 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Gesuch um neue Beurteilung
StPO; 8. Titel: Besondere Verfahren; 4. Kapitel: Verfahren bei Abwesenheit der beschuldigten Person
Art. 368 StPO · Gesuch um neue Beurteilung
Kann das Abwesenheitsurteil persönlich zugestellt werden, so wird die verurteilte Person darauf aufmerksam gemacht, dass sie innert 10 Tagen beim Gericht, welches das Urteil gefällt hat, schriftlich oder mündlich eine neue Beurteilung verlangen kann.
Im Gesuch hat die verurteilte Person kurz zu begründen, weshalb sie an der Hauptverhandlung nicht teilnehmen konnte.
Das Gericht lehnt das Gesuch ab, wenn die verurteilte Person ordnungsgemäss vorgeladen worden, aber der Hauptverhandlung unentschuldigt ferngeblieben ist.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (177)
P/18252/2019 · ge (art. 368 CPP)
Appellant Seeks Relief from Default Judgment Based on Health Issues
The court confirmed the rejection of the request for a new judgment based on this article, as the appellant's absence was deemed not excusable.
P/3299/2016 · ge (art. 368 al. 3 CPP)
Appellant v. State: Refusal to Set Aside In Absentia Conviction for Fraud and Asset Mismanagement
The court used this article as the main ground for rejecting the request for a new judgment because the appellant's absence was deemed culpable.
SB240260 · zh (Art. 368 Abs. 2 und 3 StPO)
Prosecution Appeal on Immigration Acquittal and Sentence Enhancement
Cited in connection with the right of the accused to request a new assessment of the judgment delivered in his absence (Dispositiv Ziff. 9).
P/15100/2009 · ge (Art. 368 al. 3 CPP)
Appeal Regarding Excusable Absence from Default Judgment Hearing Denied
The primary ground for rejecting the appeal was the applicant's culpable failure to appear at the judgment hearing.
P/21865/2017 · ge (art. 368 CPP)
Appeal of Judgment Rendered in Absentia Due to Willful Non-Appearance
Cited in the reasoning sections concerning the conditions for admitting a request for a new trial after a default judgment.
BK 2024 73 · be (Art. 368 Abs. 1 StPO)
Affirmation of Denial for Retrial/Deadline Reinstatement in *In Absentia* Attempted Grievous Bodily Harm Case
Cited in the reasoning (E. 5.1, E. 6.3.2, E. 6.4, E. 9.4) as the main legal basis structuring the request for re-evaluation, which was ultimately dismissed as untimely.
BK 2024 73 · be (Art. 368 Abs. 2 StPO)
Affirmation of Denial for Retrial/Deadline Reinstatement in *In Absentia* Attempted Grievous Bodily Harm Case
Cited in the reasoning (E. 5.1) regarding the required content of the re-evaluation request.
BK 2024 73 · be (Art. 368 Abs. 3 StPO)
Affirmation of Denial for Retrial/Deadline Reinstatement in *In Absentia* Attempted Grievous Bodily Harm Case
Cited in the reasoning (E. 5.1) regarding the rejection of the re-evaluation request if the absence was inexcusable.
P/7363/2020 · ge (art. 368 al. 3 CPP)
Appellant v. Lower Court on Denial of New Trial for Default Judgment Due to Unsubstantiated Absence
The court explicitly analyzed and applied this provision to reject the request for a new judgment based on the appellant's unexcused absence.
P/16180/2018 · ge (art. 368 al. 3 CPP)
Appeal Regarding Denial of New Trial After In Absentia Conviction for Usury
The court rejected the request for a new judgment because the defendant's absence from the trial was deemed culpable ('sans excuse valable').
SB230037 · zh (Art. 368 Abs. 2 und 3 StPO, Art. 379 StPO)
Prosecutor and Accused Appeal Theft, Fraud, and Driving Offenses; Conviction Upheld, Sentence Modified, Deportation Ordered
Cited in the final orders regarding the possibility for the accused to request a new hearing after the judgment in absence.
SK2 2023 5 · gr (Art. 368 StPO)
Conviction In Absentia Upheld Despite Claimed Lack of Notice
The appeal concerns the rejection of a request for a new trial under this article, which the court ultimately upheld as correctly applied by the lower court.
D.cision.2023.12 · vd (Art. 368 al. 3 CPP)
Default Conviction Upheld for Absent Appellant Missing Procedural Deadline
The court upheld the lower court's decision which rejected the request for a new trial because the appellant's absence was deemed not to be validly excused under this provision.
BB.2022.148 (Art. 368 CPP)
Moot Appeal Due to Flawed Remand Procedure
Cited as the legal basis for the 'demande de nouveau jugement' (request for a new judgment) which was initially rejected by the lower court.
SK.2022.41 (Art. 368 al. 3 CPP)
Defendant's Absence Not Excused, Retrial Denied
Used to reject the request for a new trial because the convicted person failed to appear at the hearings without a valid excuse.