312.0 STPOCPP

CH

Art. 360 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Anklageschrift

StPO; 8. Titel: Besondere Verfahren; 2. Kapitel: Abgekürztes Verfahren

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (478 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 360 StPO · Anklageschrift

Die Anklageschrift enthält: a. die Angaben nach den Artikeln 325 und 326; b. das Strafmass; c. Massnahmen; d. Weisungen bei Gewährung des bedingten Strafvollzugs; e. den Widerruf von bedingt ausgesprochenen Sanktionen oder Entlassungen aus dem Sanktionsvollzug; f. die Regelung der zivilrechtlichen Ansprüche der Privatklägerschaft; g. die Kosten- und Entschädigungsfolgen; h. den Hinweis an die Parteien, dass diese mit der Zustimmung zur Anklageschrift auf ein ordentliches Verfahren sowie auf Rechtsmittel verzichten.

Die Staatsanwaltschaft eröffnet die Anklageschrift den Parteien. Diese haben innert zehn Tagen zu erklären, ob sie der Anklageschrift zustimmen oder sie ablehnen. Die Zustimmung ist unwiderruflich.

Lehnt die Privatklägerschaft die Anklageschrift innert Frist nicht schriftlich ab, so gilt dies als Zustimmung.

Stimmen die Parteien zu, so übermittelt die Staatsanwaltschaft die Anklageschrift mit den Akten dem erstinstanzlichen Gericht.

Stimmt eine Partei nicht zu, so führt die Staatsanwaltschaft ein ordentliches Vorverfahren durch.

← Art. 359 StPO Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Geltungsbereich Art. 361 StPO →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (81)

BGE 151 IV 46 (Art. 360 CPP)

Private complainant's opposition to simplified-proceeding indictment limited to own civil claims or charge, not sentence or procedure; unopposable aspects leave opposition inoperative.

Central provision defining the scope of the complainant's right to oppose the indictment in simplified proceedings; the opposition was held inoperative because it did not concern the complainant's own rights.

P/15911/2023 · ge (art. 360 al. 3 CPP)

Victim's Appeal Against Separation of Criminal Proceedings Inadmissible

Cited in the reasoning in relation to the appellant's argument regarding the simplified procedure, but not used in the final orders.

SK.2024.60 (Art. 360 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO)

Indictments Returned for Insufficient Detail and Unclear Sentencing Rationale

Cited in conjunction with other articles for the return of the indictment due to formal deficiencies.

453----------- · vd (Art. 360 al. 3 CPP)

Appeal Against Dismissal of Theft and Forgery Charges in Financial Misconduct Case

Cited in the reasoning regarding the consequence of the complainant rejecting the indictment under the simplified procedure (leading to the resumption of ordinary preliminary investigation).

BEK 2022 185 · sz (Art. 360 Abs. 1 StPO)

Appeal Against Nolle Prosequi Decision Upheld

This provision was used to reject the appeal in the final order.

SST.2022.155 · ag (Art. 360 Abs. 1 StPO)

United States v. Smith (Child Pornography Distribution and Possession)

Cited in the indictment regarding seized items.

BEK 2021 10 · sz (Art. 360 Abs. 2 StPO)

Prosecutor's Seizure of Tractor Upheld on Theft Grounds

The court ordered the appeal to be rejected based on this provision.

SK.2021.12 (art. 360 al. 1 let. f CPP)

Gang Robbery Convictions and Swiss Expulsion

Used in conjunction with art. 124 al. 3 CPP to order the defendants to pay civil claims.

SK.2020.54 (Art. 360 Abs. 2 StPO)

Deficient Indictment in Stolen Mobile Phone Fraud Case

Cited in relation to the need for renewed consent from parties to a revised indictment in the simplified procedure.

BB.2020.27 (Art. 360 al. 5 CPP)

Federal Criminal Court Upholds Separation of Defendant's Case in Complex International Investigation

Relates to the possibility of opposing a simplified procedure.

72.2019.132 · ti (art. 360 cpv. 1 lett. g CPP)

Homicide and Drunk Driving Causing Fatal Collision

Cited in the dispositive to recognize the private prosecutors' claims for reimbursement of expenses.

SK.2019.32 (art. 360 al. 1 let. b CPP)

Defendant Guilty of Forgery and Illicit Gain from False Beneficial Ownership Declaration

This provision was used to confirm the concordance of the indictment with the case file and the court's findings.

SK.2019.33 (Art. 360 Abs. 1 lit. h StPO)

Guilty Plea in Theft and Postal Secrecy Case Leads to Suspended Fine and Restitution

Used to confirm that the indictment meets formal requirements and that the defendant and private prosecutors agreed to the indictment and waived an ordinary procedure.

SK.2019.33 (Art. 360 Abs. 4 StPO)

Guilty Plea in Theft and Postal Secrecy Case Leads to Suspended Fine and Restitution

Used as the basis for the Public Prosecutor's Office to transmit the indictment to the court for the simplified procedure.

P2 19 33 · vs (art. 360 al. 2 CPP)

Third-Party Appeal Against Confiscation in Simplified Procedure Criminal Conviction

Cited in the reasoning in relation to the existence of acceptance of the bill of indictment.