Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
312.0 STPOCPP CH

Art. 36 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Gerichtsstand bei Betreibungs- und Konkursdelikten und bei Strafverfahren gegen Unternehmen

StPO; 2. Titel: Strafbehörden; 3. Kapitel: Gerichtsstand
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (478 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 36 StPO · Gerichtsstand bei Betreibungs- und Konkursdelikten und bei Strafverfahren gegen Unternehmen

Bei Straftaten nach den Artikeln 163–171 StGB sind die Behörden am Wohnsitz, am gewöhnlichen Aufenthaltsort oder am Sitz der Schuldnerin oder des Schuldners zuständig.

Für Strafverfahren gegen das Unternehmen nach Artikel 102 StGB sind die Behörden am Sitz des Unternehmens zuständig. Dies gilt ebenso, wenn sich das Verfahren wegen des gleichen Sachverhalts auch gegen eine für das Unternehmen handelnde Person richtet.

Fehlt ein Gerichtsstand nach den Absätzen 1 und 2, so bestimmt er sich nach den Artikeln 31–35.

← Art. 35 StPO Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Geltungsbereich Art. 37 StPO →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (101)

ZZ.2000.16 · so (§ 36 f. StPO)
Excusable Default and Late Presentation of Medical Evidence
This provision is cited in relation to the refusal to award costs due to procedural fault.
ZZ.1993.21 · so (§ 36 StPO)
Right to Compensation After Discontinued Investigation
Cited as the basis for granting compensation from the state upon request when proceedings are discontinued.
ZZ.1992.26 · so (§ 36 StPO)
Compensation for Unjustified Pre-Trial Detention Despite Acquittal
This provision governs the compensation for disadvantages suffered by the accused due to pre-trial detention, which was the subject of the appeal's determination regarding the granted indemnity.
ZZ.1988.20 · so (§§ 36 ff. StPO)
Cantonal Liability for Unjustified Detention Following Foreign Acquittal in Extradition Case
This provision governs the entitlement to compensation for unjustified detention, which is the core issue addressed in the final orders.
BG.2026.3 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 StPO)
Jurisdiction for Bankruptcy Offenses: Defendant's Residence Prevails
Used to determine the competent authorities for offenses under Articles 163-171bis of the Swiss Criminal Code, including the place of residence, habitual abode, or seat of the debtor.
BG.2025.76 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 StPO)
Zurich v. Aargau: Jurisdictional Dispute Over Financial Crimes
This provision specifies the jurisdictional rules for offenses under Articles 163-171bis of the Swiss Criminal Code, including bankruptcy offenses, and points to the place of the debtor's residence, habitual abode, or registered office.
BG.2024.55 (Art. 36 Abs. 2 Satz 1 StPO)
Jurisdiction over Truck Fire Caused by Antenna Short Circuit
Basis for determining jurisdiction based on the registered seat of a company when the company is being prosecuted.
BG.2024.55 (Art. 36 Abs. 2 Satz 2 StPO)
Jurisdiction over Truck Fire Caused by Antenna Short Circuit
Allows jurisdiction to be determined by the company's seat even if an individual for the company is also being prosecuted for the same facts.
BG.2024.43 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 StPO)
Jurisdiction for Economic Mismanagement Charges: Zurich, Aargau, Zug
Establishes the ordinary place of jurisdiction for certain offenses at the seat of the company.
BG.2023.52 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 StPO)
Jurisdictional Dispute Over Mismanagement and Embezzlement
Determines the jurisdiction for offenses related to insolvency and bankruptcy, generally at the seat of the company.
BG.2023.13 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 StPO)
Inter-cantonal jurisdiction over criminal proceedings.
Cited as the basis for declaring the authorities of the Canton of Obwalden competent and obligated to prosecute and judge the offenses attributed to A., in conjunction with Art. 34 Abs. 1 StPO.
BG.2022.17 (Art. 36 al. 2 CPP)
Federal Criminal Court Rules Zurich Has Jurisdiction in Money Laundering Case
Determines the competent authority for prosecuting offenses committed within an enterprise, specifically for the headquarters of the banks C. and D.
PM/986/2020 · ge (Art. 36 CPP)
Prosecutor v. Defendant Regarding Timely Opposition to Penalty Order Conversion
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the order being reviewed by the TAPEM.
BG.2021.41 (Art. 36 Abs. 2 StPO)
Jurisdictional Dispute: Canton of First Significant Investigative Action Competent
This article establishes that jurisdiction for offenses committed by a legal entity is at the entity's registered office, but its application was considered and rejected in favor of general jurisdiction rules.
BG.2019.50 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 StPO)
Zurich Canton Prosecution Competence in Bankruptcy Case
This provision determines the competent authorities for bankruptcy offenses based on the debtor's domicile, place of habitual residence, or registered office.