312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 355 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Verfahren bei Einsprache
StPO; 8. Titel: Besondere Verfahren; 1. Kapitel: Strafbefehlsverfahren, Übertretungsstrafverfahren
Art. 355 StPO · Verfahren bei Einsprache
Wird Einsprache erhoben, so nimmt die Staatsanwaltschaft die weiteren Beweise ab, die zur Beurteilung der Einsprache erforderlich sind.
Bleibt eine Einsprache erhebende Person trotz Vorladung einer Einvernahme unentschuldigt fern, so gilt ihre Einsprache als zurückgezogen.
Nach Abnahme der Beweise entscheidet die Staatsanwaltschaft, ob sie: a. am Strafbefehl festhält; b. das Verfahren einstellt; c. einen neuen Strafbefehl erlässt; d. Anklage beim erstinstanzlichen Gericht erhebt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (466)
51/2025/1 · sh (Art. 355 Abs. 2 StPO)
Foreign Summons Service and Non-Appearance; Deemed Withdrawal of Objection
This article was cited as the legal basis for considering the objection withdrawn, which the court ultimately rejected for a person residing abroad.
BEK 2025 120 · sz (Art. 355 Abs. 1 und Abs. 3 StPO)
Prosecutor's Decision to Finalize Penalty Order Overturned Due to Payment Not Constituting Tacit Objection Withdrawal
Cited in the reasoning section that precedes the dispositive, indicating that the procedure must continue following the annulment of the contested decision.
BK 2025 348 · be (Art. 355 Abs. 2 und 356 Abs. 4 StPO)
Regional Court Decision Affirmed on Presumed Withdrawal of Criminal Penalty Opposition Due to Unexcused Absence
These articles on the fictitious withdrawal of the appeal were cited in the reasoning section (E. 4) to explain the legal implication of non-appearance.
SBK.2025.152 · ag (Art. 355 Abs. 2 StPO)
Appellate Court: No Presumption of Withdrawal for Foreign Residents Facing Penalty Orders
Applied to determine that the appeal had to be upheld because the withdrawal fiction was not applicable to the appellant residing abroad.
P/15837/2025 · ge (Art. 355 al. 1 CPP)
Prosecutor's DNA Order Upheld Following Drug Trafficking Conviction
This article was cited to justify the need for DNA profiling in case the accused opposed the penal order.
P/5154/2025 · ge (art. 355 al. 2 CPP)
Appeal Granted: Reinstatement of Term Missed Due to Medical Emergency in Deportation Case
This provision concerning the deemed withdrawal of the appeal due to non-appearance was central to the court's decision to allow the appeal, as it found the condition (lack of disinterest) was not met.
BK 2024 512 · be (Art. 355 Abs. 2 StPO)
Appellant v. Prosecution: Withdrawal of Objection and Diplomatic Immunity Claim
The court explicitly upheld the decision that the appeal was deemed withdrawn due to the appellant's unexcused failure to appear, as cited in Order 1.
P3 25 162 · vs (Art. 355 Abs. 3 lit. a StPO)
Cantonal Court Upholds Penalty Order Based on Statutory Fiction of Delivery
Cited in the reasoning describing the procedure after a valid objection.
P3 25 162 · vs (Art. 355 f. StPO)
Cantonal Court Upholds Penalty Order Based on Statutory Fiction of Delivery
Cited in the reasoning concerning the procedure following a valid objection.
SBE.2025.10 · ag (Art. 355 Abs. 2 StPO)
Reinstatement of Objection for Personal Emergencies
Cited as the legal basis for considering the appeal withdrawn due to the appellant's unexcused absence from the state prosecution's hearing.
BEK 2025 40 · sz (Art. 355 Abs. 1 Buchstabe a StPO)
Prosecutorial Discretion in Refusal to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
The court declared the appeal inadmissible because the contested decision did not contain a final order as required by this provision.
P/28090/2023 · ge (art. 355 CPP)
Appellant v. Prosecution (Timeliness of Criminal Order Opposition)
The case is referred back to the Public Prosecutor's Office to rule on the opposition to the penal order.
P/25167/2019 · ge (art. 355 al.1 ou al. 3 CPP)
Invalid Service and Due Process in Penal Order Opposition
Provision cited for the next step in the procedure after the appeal was admitted, concerning the public prosecutor's decision on the opposition.
BK 2025 119 · be (Art. 355 Abs. 2 StPO)
Prosecutor v. Defendant (Failure to Attend Hearing Due to Known Psychological Conditions)
This article establishes that failing to appear for a hearing after filing an objection results in the objection being deemed withdrawn.
SK.2024.45 (art. 355 cpv. 3 e 356 cpv. 1 CPP)
Police Officer Convicted of Abuse of Authority and Assault
These articles governed the transfer of the case to the criminal court after the prosecutor confirmed the indictment and opposition.