312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 352 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Voraussetzungen
StPO; 8. Titel: Besondere Verfahren; 1. Kapitel: Strafbefehlsverfahren, Übertretungsstrafverfahren
Art. 352 StPO · Voraussetzungen
Hat die beschuldigte Person im Vorverfahren den Sachverhalt eingestanden oder ist dieser anderweitig ausreichend geklärt, so erlässt die Staatsanwaltschaft einen Strafbefehl, wenn sie, unter Einrechnung einer allfällig zu widerrufenden bedingten Strafe oder bedingten Entlassung, eine der folgenden Strafen für ausreichend hält: a. eine Busse; b. eine Geldstrafe von höchstens 180 Tagessätzen; c. ... d. eine Freiheitsstrafe von höchstens 6 Monaten.
Jede dieser Strafen kann mit einer Massnahme nach den Artikeln 66 und 67 e–73 StGB verbunden werden.
Strafen nach Absatz 1 Buchstaben b–d können miteinander verbunden werden, sofern die insgesamt ausgesprochene Strafe einer Freiheitsstrafe von höchstens 6 Monaten entspricht. Eine Verbindung mit Busse ist immer möglich.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (114)
PKG 2015 19 · gr (Art. 352 Abs. 1 StPO)
Invalidation of Penalty Order for Procedural Deficiencies and Insufficient Factual Basis
Basis for invalidating the penalty order because the accused did not admit the facts and they were not otherwise sufficiently clarified.
502 2025 162 · fr (Art. 352 CPP)
Economic Development Department v. Public Prosecutor Regarding Complainant Status in Fraud Case
Cited in the description of the process of concluding the preliminary investigation.
501 2025 64 · fr (art. 352ss CPP)
Federal Weapons Act Conviction Upheld Despite Appeal Over Notification and Scope of Ban
Cited in the penalty order concerning the factual conviction based on the rules of criminal procedure.
BG.2025.34 (Art. 352 Abs. 1 StPO)
Jurisdiction Dispute: Bern v. Zurich
This provision is cited as an example of a procedural act that can indicate a de facto acceptance of jurisdiction.
BK 2025 154 · be (Art. 352 Abs. 1 StPO)
Prosecutor's Decision to Sever Joint Assault Trial Overturned Due to Procedural Flaws and Merits Analysis
Cited in the reasoning section (E. 5.2.) regarding the prerequisites for issuing a summary penalty order, which influenced the decision on separation.
P/1853/2025 · ge (Art. 352 al. 1 CPP)
Appeal Concerning Late Filing of Objection to Penal Order Due to Alleged Insufficient Understanding of Notification
Cited to describe the nature of the penal order issued by the Public Prosecutor.
SK.2024.25 (art. 352 cpv. 1 CPP)
Money Laundering: Border Cash Seizure and Drug Trafficking Links
This article defines the conditions for issuing a decree of accusation and was used to validate the decree of accusation.
KE 6 2024 · ai (Art. 352 ff. StPO)
Alcohol Sales and Coercion Convictions Upheld
This article was cited in the provisional penal order that was subject to review, concerning procedural aspects of the decision (penal order).
BG.2024.64 (Art. 352 Abs. 1 StPO)
Thurgau's Jurisdiction Over Criminal Offenses Upheld
Cited in the reasoning as a procedural act that can lead to the implicit recognition of jurisdiction by a canton.
BG.2024.23 (Art. 352 Abs. 1 StPO)
Federal Criminal Court Rules on Jurisdictional Conflict in Theft Case
Cited as an example of an act that constitutes conclusive recognition of jurisdiction.
BG.2024.28 (Art. 352 Abs. 1 StPO)
Jurisdiction for COVID-19 Certificate Forgery Case
Mentioned as a procedural act that can lead to the tacit recognition of jurisdiction.
BK 2024 275 · be (Art. 352 StPO)
Obergericht Upholds Pre-Trial Detention for Algerian National Facing Theft Charges Due to High Flight Risk
Cited in reasoning regarding the maximum sentence the public prosecutor can impose in summary penal orders (Strafbefehlsverfahren), relevant for assessing potential pre-trial detention duration.
P/6636/2023 · ge (art. 352 al. 1 CPP)
Spouse Protection Order Extension Limitation
Cited in the reasoning when the appellant argues that the risk of collusion has ceased following the announcement of a penal order.
BG.2024.11 (Art. 352 Abs. 1 StPO)
Schwyz v. Zurich: Jurisdiction over Cross-Cantonal Fraud Case
Cited as an example of an action that constitutes a conclusive recognition of jurisdiction.
P1 23 23 · vs (art. 352 al. 1 CPP)
Penalty Order Validity and Opposition Admissibility in Bodily Harm and Insult Case
Cited implicitly as the basis for the validity of the initial penalty order, which was challenged but ultimately upheld by confirming that the facts were deemed established based on the file.