312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 336 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Beschuldigte Person, amtliche und notwendige Verteidigung
StPO; 7. Titel: Erstinstanzliches Hauptverfahren; 2. Kapitel: Durchführung der Hauptverhandlung
Art. 336 StPO · Beschuldigte Person, amtliche und notwendige Verteidigung
Die beschuldigte Person hat an der Hauptverhandlung persönlich teilzunehmen, wenn: a. Verbrechen oder Vergehen behandelt werden; oder b. die Verfahrensleitung ihre persönliche Teilnahme anordnet.
Die amtliche und die notwendige Verteidigung haben an der Hauptverhandlung persönlich teilzunehmen.
Die Verfahrensleitung kann die beschuldigte Person auf ihr Gesuch hin vom persönlichen Erscheinen dispensieren, wenn diese wichtige Gründe geltend macht und wenn ihre Anwesenheit nicht erforderlich ist.
Bleibt die beschuldigte Person unentschuldigt aus, so sind die Vorschriften über das Abwesenheitsverfahren anwendbar.
Bleibt die amtliche oder die notwendige Verteidigung aus, so wird die Verhandlung verschoben.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (47)
SK.2024.25 (art. 336 cpv. 1 lett. a CPP)
Money Laundering: Border Cash Seizure and Drug Trafficking Links
This article mandates the personal appearance of the accused at the trial and was used to address the defendant's presence.
SB230207 · zh (Art. 336 Abs. 3 StPO)
Acquittal for Attempted Burglary, Conviction for Illegal Baton Possession Upheld
Provides the legal basis for dispensing with the accused's personal appearance in court.
502 2024 63 · fr (Art. 336 al. 2 CPP)
Appellant v. State: Denial of Motion to Replace Court-Appointed Counsel
Cited in the reasoning as an example of circumstances justifying a change of counsel (absence of counsel at hearings).
P/12686/2016 · ge (Art. 336 CPP)
Appellant's Unexcused Absence Leads to Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal
Cited to justify the requirement for the accused's personal appearance when suspected of a felony or misdemeanor.
CPEN.2022.55 · ne (art. 336 CPP)
Appeal Dismissal for Untimely Filing and Merits of Refusal to Drug Test
Cited in the final orders, likely related to the procedure concerning defense counsel/attendance at the hearing, considered in the context of the rejected ground of appeal.
BK 2022 395 · be (Art. 336 Abs. 3 StPO)
Appeal Against Dismissal of Objection Due to Absent Defendant Despite Lawyer's Presence and Subsequent Medical Justification
Cited when discussing the mandatory requirement for the accused person's presence at the main hearing.
SBE.2023.5 · ag (Art. 336 al. 3 StPO)
Appellant's Repeated Failure to Present Legally Sufficient Arguments Results in Dismissal of Appeal
Mentioned in the context of requesting an exemption from attending a hearing.
2022.04.26.sr.1 · bl (Art. 336 Abs. 3 StPO)
Conviction and Sentence Upheld in Aggravated Assault and Coercion Case
Cited in the dispositive related to procedural rules.
502 2021 91 · fr (Art. 336 Abs. 3 StPO)
Appellant Deportation Precluded Objection Hearing; Conviction Overturned on Procedural Grounds.
The court implicitly referenced this provision when discussing the applicant's request for dispensation from personal appearance at the hearing.
SB.2018.68 · bs (Art. 336 Abs. 3 StPO)
Appeal Regarding Fraud Conviction and Procedural Defects
Cited in the operative part of the judgment related to the procedural basis for the judgment, specifically concerning the appellant's dispensation from appearing.
BB.2020.3 (art. 336 al. 2 CPP)
Swiss Court Reinstates Lawyer Barred from Uzbekistan
This provision is cited in the legal reasoning as an example of a defense counsel's absence that could justify a change of appointed counsel.
SU190043 · zh (Art. 336 Abs. 3 StPO)
Improper Trial Procedure in Salon Prostitution Case Remand
Cited by the appellant and discussed in the reasoning as violated by the lower court's decision to dispense with the defendant's appearance.
2019.11.12.sr.2 · bl (Art. 336 Abs. 3 StPO)
Sentencing and Deportation Upheld for Recidivist Property Offender
Cited in the dispositive as part of the legal basis for the sentence.
BK 2019 247 · be (Art. 336 Abs. 1 Bst. b StPO)
Defendant's Unexcused Absence Leads to Withdrawal of Parking Violation Objections Affirmation
This article was referenced in the reasoning concerning the court's authority to summon the appellant.
72.2018.202 · ti (art. 336 cpv. 3 CPP)
State v. Defendant (Severe Traffic Infraction/Road Rage)
Used to justify the court's decision to proceed in the defendant's absence (in the reasoning section, not the operative part, but highly procedural context).