312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 295 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Vorzeigegeld
StPO; 5. Titel: Zwangsmassnahmen; 8. Kapitel: Geheime Überwachungsmassnahmen
Art. 295 StPO · Vorzeigegeld
Auf Antrag der Staatsanwaltschaft kann der Bund über die Nationalbank die für Scheingeschäfte und die Dokumentation der wirtschaftlichen Leistungsfähigkeit benötigten Geldbeträge in der erforderlichen Menge und Art zur Verfügung stellen.
Der Antrag ist mit einer kurzen Sachverhaltsdarstellung an das Bundesamt für Polizei zu richten.
Die Staatsanwaltschaft trifft die notwendigen Vorkehrungen zum Schutze des zur Verfügung gestellten Geldes. Bei Verlust haftet der Bund oder der Kanton, dem die Staatsanwaltschaft zugehört.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (114)
51/2001/11 · sh (Art. 295 Abs. 2 lit. a StPO)
Public Prosecutor's Office v. Private Complainant regarding Youth Violence on Public Transport
This provision defines the condition for referring a case to the private penal complaint procedure (lack of public interest based on special relationships), which the court reviewed in its decision.
Arr.t.2011.5 · vd (Art. 295 let. a CPP)
Accused v. State (Right to Appointed Counsel for Appeal)
This procedural rule likely provides the basis for the court's jurisdiction or handling of the appeal that led to this decision.
Arr.t.2010.1723 · vd (Art. 295 let. b CPP)
Conditional Release for High-Risk Offender Based on Treatment Feasibility
Cited in the introductory section, likely pertaining to the appeal procedure against a decision on provisional detention, but not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive orders I-VI.
Arr.t.2010.1716 · vd (Art. 295 let. b CPP)
Defendant's Appeal Against Denial of Provisional Release in Attempted Murder Case
Cited in the introductory section, relevant to the procedural context of the decision, although not explicitly in the final numbered orders.
Arr.t.2010.1714 · vd (Art. 295 let. b CPP)
Defendant v. State (Pre-Trial Detention for Armed Robbery)
This article is cited at the beginning, suggesting it relates to the procedure or grounds for the appeal being reviewed by the Court of Appeal (Tribunal d'accusation).
Arr.t.2010.1712 · vd (Art. 295 let. b CPP)
Foreign National Cocaine Trafficker Flight Risk Detention Appeal
This procedural article is cited in the introduction, related to the context of the decision regarding release.
Arr.t.2010.1699 · vd (Art. 295 let. b CPP)
Appeal Against Refusal of Provisional Release for Aggravated Robbery and Drug Offenses Denied
This provision seems to be cited contextually with Art. 59 al. 1 CPP at the start, but its direct application in the dispositive is not confirmed as it is not listed in orders I, II, or III.
Arr.t.2010.1682 · vd (Art. 295 let. b CPP)
Appeal of Refusal of Provisional Release for Weapons Offenses and Threats
Cited in the text preceding the dispositive, likely related to the appeal being heard by the Tribunal d'Accusation, although it doesn't explicitly appear in the numbered orders (I-VI) as the basis for the final ruling itself, but it is cited alongside Art. 59 al. 1 CPP as context for the case being heard.
Arr.t.2010.1678 · vd (Art. 295 let. a CPP)
Right to Appointed Counsel in Complex Criminal Case
Cited at the beginning, this provision relates to the general context of the review, although the dispositive focuses on costs and legal aid assignment.
Arr.t.2010.1639 · vd (Art. 295 let. b CPP)
ATM Theft Suspect Detention Upheld
Cited in the initial context regarding the appeal procedure but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I-VI).
Arr.t.2010.1619 · vd (Art. 295 let. a CPP)
Appeal Regarding Refusal to Change Court-Appointed Counsel
Cited in the preamble, but not explicitly mentioned in the final operative orders (I-IV).
Arr.t.2010.1611 · vd (Art. 295 let. b CPP)
Appeal Against Detention Pending Investigation for Foreign National Law Violation
This article is cited in the preliminary section (Vu l'enquête) but is not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive orders (I to VII).
Arr.t.2010.1658 · vd (Art. 295 let. a CPP)
Appeal Regarding Appointed Counsel Replacement and Bank Document Production
This procedural provision is cited at the beginning and relates to the basis for reviewing the challenged decisions (the change of counsel and the production order).
Arr.t.2010.1568 · vd (Art. 295 let. b CPP)
Denial of Provisional Release Upheld Due to Flight Risk and Recidivism Concerns
Cited in the dispositive order III concerning the imposition of costs.
Arr.t.2010.1551 · vd (Art. 295 let. b CPP)
State v. Accused Regarding Detention Post-Aggravated Robbery Plea
Cited at the beginning, but this procedural article is related to the competence to hear the appeal, which is implicitly confirmed by the Tribunal ruling on the merits.