312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 291 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Führungsperson
StPO; 5. Titel: Zwangsmassnahmen; 8. Kapitel: Geheime Überwachungsmassnahmen
Art. 291 StPO · Führungsperson
Die verdeckte Ermittlerin oder der verdeckte Ermittler unterstehen während des Einsatzes der direkten Weisungsbefugnis der Führungsperson. Während des Einsatzes erfolgt der Kontakt zwischen der Staatsanwaltschaft und der verdeckten Ermittlerin oder dem verdeckten Ermittler ausschliesslich über die Führungsperson.
Die Führungsperson hat insbesondere folgende Aufgaben: a. Sie instruiert die verdeckte Ermittlerin oder den verdeckten Ermittler detailliert und fortlaufend über Auftrag und Befugnisse sowie über den Umgang mit der Legende. b. Sie leitet und betreut die verdeckte Ermittlerin oder den verdeckten Ermittler und beurteilt laufend die Risikosituation. c. Sie hält mündliche Berichte der verdeckten Ermittlerin oder des verdeckten Ermittlers schriftlich fest und führt ein vollständiges Dossier über den Einsatz. d. Sie informiert die Staatsanwaltschaft laufend und vollständig über den Einsatz.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (186)
SBK.2024.89 · ag (Art. 291 Abs. 2 lit. a StPO)
Lawful Secret Drug Trafficking Investigation Upheld
Provision regarding the instructions to be given to undercover investigators.
D.cision.2015.687 · vd (Art. 291 CPP)
Appeal Against Partial Lifting of Asset Sequestration in Fraud Investigation
This article appears in the initial list of provisions but is not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders (I-V).
17.2009.49 · ti (art. 291 cpv. 1 CPP)
Appellant v. State: Timeliness of Opposition to Criminal Accusation Notice
Cited in the operative part to pronounce the judgment based on the outcome.
17.2009.7 · ti (art. 291 cpv. 1 CPP)
Appellant v. State Regarding Timeliness of Opposition to Criminal Indictment
Cited as the basis for issuing the judgment (general procedural provision for the decision).
17.2008.71 · ti (art. 291 cpv. 1 CPP con rinvio dell’art. 301 cpv. 2 CPP)
Applicant v. State: Revocation of Suspended Sentence Calculation in Sentencing Review
These articles were cited in relation to the judgment being pronounced (rejection of the revision request).
17.2008.56 · ti (art. 291 cpv. 1 CPP)
Sexual Offenses and Drug Offenses Appeal Rejection
This provision was cited in the introductory phrase before the operative part, indicating the procedural basis for rendering the decision (which declared the appeal inadmissible).
17.2008.41 · ti (art. 291 cpv. 1 CPP)
Appeals Against Conviction for Sexual Acts with Minors and Related Crimes
Cited in the preamble to the final orders as the legal basis for issuing the ruling.
17.2007.83 · ti (art. 291 cpv. 1 CPP)
Appellant's Late Appeal Reinstatement Denied Due to Insufficient Proof of Incapacity
This provision was cited in the preamble to the ruling section and is related to the decision to dismiss the appeal.
17.2008.53 · ti (art. 291 cpv. 1 CPP)
Mother's Appeal Against Indeterminate Placement Order for Sexual Offense Inadmissible
Cited as the basis for pronouncing the final orders, specifically the declaration of inadmissibility of the appeal.
17.2008.28 · ti (art. 291 cpv. 1 CPP)
Appeal Dismissed: Illicit Asset Use and Document Forgery Conviction Upheld
The court used this article in its decision-making process, as indicated before the final orders.
17.2008.50 · ti (art. 291 cpv. 1 CPP)
Traffic Violation Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing
Cited as the legal basis for the court's pronouncement (decision) to dismiss the appeal/restitution request.
17.2008.45 · ti (art. 291 cpv. 1 CPP)
Vehicle Owner Appeal Dismissed for Implausible Driver Defense in Speeding Case
This article is cited as the basis for the final pronouncement of the decision, indicating the procedural rule for issuing the judgment.
17.2005.53 · ti (art. 291 cpv. 1 CPP)
Receiving Stolen Goods Conviction Upheld Despite Claim of Ignorance
The decision to reject the appeal (insofar as admissible) is based on this procedural provision.
17.2005.22 · ti (art. 291 cpv. 1 CPP)
State v. Defendant (Excessive Speeding and Procedural Appeals)
This article was cited for the pronouncement of the judgment, implicitly related to the rejection of the appeal.
17.2005.18 · ti (art. 291 cpv. 1 CPP)
Criminal Cassation Appeal Admitted Regarding Inadmissible Opposition to Accusation Decree Due to Untimely Filing and Lack of Valid Cassation Grounds
This provision was cited as the basis for the court's decision to declare the appeal inadmissible.