312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 282 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Voraussetzungen
StPO; 5. Titel: Zwangsmassnahmen; 8. Kapitel: Geheime Überwachungsmassnahmen
Art. 282 StPO · Voraussetzungen
Die Staatsanwaltschaft und, im Ermittlungsverfahren, die Polizei können Personen und Sachen an allgemein zugänglichen Orten verdeckt beobachten und dabei Bild- oder Tonaufzeichnungen machen, wenn: a. aufgrund konkreter Anhaltspunkte anzunehmen ist, dass Verbrechen oder Vergehen begangen worden sind; und b. die Ermittlungen sonst aussichtslos wären oder unverhältnismässig erschwert würden.
Hat eine von der Polizei angeordnete Observation einen Monat gedauert, so bedarf ihre Fortsetzung der Genehmigung durch die Staatsanwaltschaft.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (41)
ST.2021.60.SK3 · sg (Art. 282 Abs. 1 StPO)
Private Detective Evidence Inadmissibility in Fraud Case
The requirement of sufficient suspicion (Tatverdacht) under this article was not met, which led to the inadmissibility of the evidence obtained via the private surveillance.
ST.2021.60.SK3 · sg (Art. 282 Abs. 1 StPO)
Acquittal for Habitual Fraud Upheld Due to Inadmissible Initial Evidence (Fruit of Poisonous Tree Doctrine)
The lack of sufficient suspicion according to this article was the reason why the primary evidence (observation) could not have been lawfully obtained by the criminal prosecution authorities.
502 2023 77 · fr (art. 282 CPP)
Cannabis Trafficking Investigation Surveillance and Controlled Purchase Legality Upheld
The provision regarding secret observations was cited by the appellant and discussed in relation to the nature of the police measures used.
ARMP.2023.2 · ne (Art. 282 CPP)
Public Prosecutor's Refusal to Exclude Evidence Upheld on Preliminary Review
Cited to define secret observation, but the court found the surveillance did not qualify as such.
P/10236/2021 · ge (art. 282 al. 1 let. a CPP)
Appeal Against Secret Surveillance and Technical Measures in Armed Robbery and Drug Trafficking Investigation
This provision regarding concrete indications required for secret observation was analyzed and found to be satisfied, leading to the rejection of the related part of the appeal.
P/10236/2021 · ge (art. 282 al. 2 CPP)
Appeal Against Secret Surveillance and Technical Measures in Armed Robbery and Drug Trafficking Investigation
This provision concerning the continuation of secret observation after one month was analyzed, but ultimately found not to have been violated, leading to the rejection of the related part of the appeal.
BK 2021 241 · be (Art. 282 StPO)
Appeal Regarding Legality of Police Observation and Admissibility of Evidence in Drug Offenses Case
The court found that the observation was lawful based on the conditions set out in this article.
BK 2021 7 · be (Art. 282 Abs. 2 StPO)
Drug Violation Observation Protocol Violation and Right to be Heard Annulment
The duration threshold for mandatory state prosecutor authorization is relevant to the assessment of the legality of the police observation.
BK 2021 7 · be (Art. 282 f. StPO)
Drug Violation Observation Protocol Violation and Right to be Heard Annulment
The subject matter of the appeal concerns an observation under these articles.
BK 2020 295 · be (Art. 282 Abs. 2 StPO)
Accused Challenges Notification of Short-Term Police Observation
Cited regarding the fact that the observation did not require the approval of the Public Prosecutor's Office because it lasted less than a month.
D.cision.2020.326 · vd (Art. 282 CPP)
Retroactive Surveillance and Observation Orders Annulled for Investigation Overreach
Cited in the introductory section and relevant to the right of appeal against observation orders.
2019.04.02.sr.4 · bl (Art. 282 StPO)
Unlawful Surveillance Due to Insufficient "Catalog Offense" Threshold
The court found that the conditions for observation, including image or sound recordings, under this article were met, but ultimately dismissed the appeal regarding the removal of evidence obtained through this measure.
BK 2018 503 · be (Art. 282 Abs. 1 StPO)
Surveillance Evidence Admissibility in Social Security Fraud Prosecution
Used to determine that state authorities could have legitimately obtained the evidence in question (observation material).
D.cision.2013.323 · vd (Art. 282 CPP)
State v. Defendant (Narcotics Detention Extension Appeal)
Cited in the context of discussing the evidentiary value of surveillance measures related to the appeal arguments.
21 09 42 · lu (§ 282 Abs. 1 StPO e contrario)
Challenge to Urgent Inpatient Psychiatric Order Based on Insufficient Medical Urgency
Cited as the basis for ordering the state to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings.