312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 281 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Voraussetzung und Durchführung
StPO; 5. Titel: Zwangsmassnahmen; 8. Kapitel: Geheime Überwachungsmassnahmen
Art. 281 StPO · Voraussetzung und Durchführung
Der Einsatz darf nur gegenüber der beschuldigten Person angeordnet werden.
Räumlichkeiten oder Fahrzeuge von Drittpersonen dürfen nur überwacht werden, wenn aufgrund bestimmter Tatsachen angenommen werden muss, dass die beschuldigte Person sich in diesen Räumlichkeiten aufhält oder dieses Fahrzeug benutzt.
Der Einsatz darf nicht angeordnet werden, um: a. zu Beweiszwecken Vorgänge zu erfassen, an denen eine beschuldigte Person beteiligt ist, die sich im Freiheitsentzug befindet; b. Räumlichkeiten oder Fahrzeuge einer Drittperson zu überwachen, die einer der in den Artikeln 170–173 genannten Berufsgruppen angehört.
Im Übrigen richtet sich der Einsatz technischer Überwachungsgeräte nach den Artikeln 269–279.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (58)
SB240422 · zh (Art. 281 Abs. 4 i.V.m. Art. 277 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 141 Abs. 1 StPO)
SkyECC Evidence Admissibility and Territoriality Principle in Narcotics Case
Cited in the reasoning that supports the absolute inadmissibility of the evidence, even though the actual dispositive only cites Art. 141 Abs. 1 indirectly via the finding of inadmissibility (Art. 141 Abs. 1 is the basis for the explicit order in point 2).
SBK.2023.31 · ag (Art. 281 Abs. 2 StPO)
Acoustic Surveillance and Foreign Data Use Upheld
Cited regarding the conditions for monitoring premises or vehicles of third parties.
SBK.2023.31 · ag (Art. 281 Abs. 3 lit. a StPO)
Acoustic Surveillance and Foreign Data Use Upheld
Cited as a condition under which surveillance cannot be ordered (for individuals in detention).
2022.12.20.sr.2 · bl (Art. 281 Abs. 4 StPO)
Exclusion of Foreign Technical Surveillance Evidence Due to Territoriality Violation
Cited in order 1.2 as the provision making Art. 277 StPO applicable to technical surveillance measures.
BK 2021 415 · be (Art. 281 Abs. 4 StPO)
Drug Trafficking Suspect GPS Tracking and Surveillance Legality Review
Cited as part of the legal basis for the admissibility of the appeal regarding the communication of surveillance measures.
D.cision.2019.726 · vd (Art. 281 al. 3 let. a CPP)
State v. Appellant Regarding Use of Cell Surveillance Video
The court admitted the appeal and based the reform on the finding that recording a detainee's behavior for evidentiary purposes is expressly prohibited by this article.
ARMP.2018.67 · ne (Art. 281 al. 4 CPP)
Legality of Retroactive Data Retrieval and GPS Tracking in Drug Trafficking Investigation
Cited in conjunction with Art. 279 al. 3 CPP concerning the admissibility of the appeal against secret surveillance.
BK 2017 447 · be (Art. 281 al. 4 CPP)
Admissibility of Fortuitously Discovered Evidence from Unrelated Surveillance
Cited in the reasoning to establish the applicability of procedural rules concerning fortuitous discoveries in this specific context.
P/10517/2015 · ge (art. 281 al. 3 let. a CPP)
Surveillance of Detainee's Visitor Upheld
The appeal was rejected based on the finding that the surveillance measure did not violate this provision concerning the prohibition of recording a detainee's behavior for evidentiary purposes.
SB130425 · zh (Art. 281 Abs. 4 StPO i.V.m. Art. 279 Abs. 1 und 2 StPO)
Drug Trafficking and Money Laundering Conviction Upheld; Sentence Adjusted
These articles are cited in relation to the monitoring of a vehicle.
2012.02.29.1 · bl (Art. 281 Abs. 4 StPO)
Surveillance Operation Lacked Prior Judicial Authorization, Retroactive Approval Denied
This provision, in conjunction with Art. 274 Abs. 1 StPO, states that a subsequent authorization of surveillance is possible, but not if the surveillance was conducted by the police without a prior order.
350.2012.114 · bl (Art. 281 Abs. 4 StPO)
Retroactive Surveillance Authorization Denied Due to Untimely Request
Cited in conjunction with Art. 274 Abs. 1 StPO regarding the requirement for court approval of technical surveillance and the subsequent inadmissibility of a late request.
INC.2008.32005 · ti (art. 281 cpv. 1 CPP)
Appeal Rejection: Psychiatric Evaluation in Insurance Fraud Case
Cited to confirm that the appeal was filed within the prescribed ten-day deadline.
INC.2007.49104 · ti (art. 280 e 281 CPP)
Appeals Against Partial Joinder of Criminal Proceedings Dismissed
These articles of the CPP were cited in the final decision which declared the appeals inadmissible (Irricevibili).
INC.2007.49103 · ti (art. 280, 281, 282 CPP)
Prosecutor's Bifurcation of Criminal Proceedings Overturned for Lack of Reasoning
Cited as general procedural articles considered in the decision.