312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 262 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Schrift- und Sprachproben
StPO; 5. Titel: Zwangsmassnahmen; 6. Kapitel: Erkennungsdienstliche Erfassung, Schrift- und Sprachproben
Art. 262 StPO · Schrift- und Sprachproben
Beschuldigte Personen, Zeuginnen und Zeugen sowie Auskunftspersonen können dazu angehalten werden, für einen Schrift- oder Sprachvergleich Schrift- oder Sprachproben abzugeben.
Personen, die sich der Abgabe solcher Proben widersetzen, können mit Ordnungsbusse bestraft werden. Ausgenommen sind die beschuldigte Person und, im Umfang ihres Verweigerungsrechts, Personen, die zur Aussage- oder Zeugnisverweigerung berechtigt sind.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (20)
51/2009/25A · sh (Art. 262 Abs. 2 StPO)
Prosecutor's Indictment and Request for Acquittal in Discrimination Case
The court allowed the prosecution to combine the indictment with a written motion for acquittal when waiving participation in the main hearing.
72.2019.135 · ti (art. 262 cpv. 1 lett. b CPP)
Employee Convicted of Data Abuse, Embezzlement, and Money Laundering for Unauthorized Bank Transfers
This article on precautionary seizure was cited in order 7.1 regarding the blocking of the property register.
CCP.2004.147 · ne (art.262 CPP)
Public Prosecutor v. Acquitted Individual (Debit Card Fraud Appeal)
Used alongside Art. 397 CP to confirm the novelty of the facts supporting the revision.
CCP.2004.147 · ne (art.262 al.2 CPP)
Public Prosecutor v. Acquitted Individual (Debit Card Fraud Appeal)
Used to establish the admissibility of the public prosecutor's request for revision against the convicted person.
CCP.2003.124 · ne (art.262 al.1 CPP)
Revision Appeal Based on Newly Disclosed Driver Identity
Cited in the reasoning regarding the conditions for admissibility of the revision request based on new facts/evidence.
KA 03 100 · lu (§ 262 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO)
Supervisory Appeal Jurisdiction Over Police Conduct During Investigation
This provision determines that the Public Prosecutor is competent to assess the complaint, justifying the transfer.
KA 03 47 · lu (§ 262 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO)
Private Complainant's Cost Appeal in Battery Penalty Order Dismissed
The court cited this provision to establish that the State Prosecutor's Office, not the Criminal and Indictment Commission, is the competent authority for the correct appeal specified in § 261 StPO.
10.2003.89 · ti (art. 262 CPP)
Acquittal in Falsified Oil Change Service Fraud Case
Cited in the context of the final judgment process (the part leading to the final dispositive orders).
CCP.2002.39 · ne (art.262 al.1 CPP)
Revision Denial for Death Threat Fine Based on Alleged Complaint Withdrawal
Cited in the reasoning to explain the requirements for review, which was ultimately declared inadmissible based on procedural grounds.
CCP.2001.138 · ne (art. 262 CPP)
Revision of Penalty Order Based on New Medical Evidence of Severe Injury
The procedure was initiated based on a request for revision, and Article 262 CPP governed the conditions for such a request.
CCP.1999.6784 · ne (Art. 262 al.1 CPP)
Revision Request Against Counterfeiting Conviction Rejected
The court cites this article to confirm the admissibility of the revision application since the judgment had acquired the force of res judicata.
CCP.1999.6784 · ne (Art. 262 al.1 CPP)
Revision Request Against Counterfeiting Conviction Rejected
The court implicitly uses the requirement of new and important facts or evidence for revision when examining the grounds raised by the appellant.
CCP.1998.6601 · ne (article 262 al.2 CPP)
Prosecutor's Revision Following Confession to Burglary and Theft
This provision was the basis for admitting the revision appeal filed by the public prosecutor.
21 97 103 · lu (Art. 262 Ziff. 1 Abs. 1 StPO)
Legal Aid Competence and Appeal Remedy in Criminal Proceedings for Private Prosecutors
This provision, governing the limited review available in the appeal against decisions on legal aid, was not found to be evidently incompatible with the ECHR.
CCP.1998.6587 · ne (art.262 al.1 CPP)
Revision Denial in Child Sexual Abuse Case Based on Confessions and Consistent Testimony
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the admissibility of the appeal for revision, though the final order just rejects the appeal.