Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
312.0 STPOCPP CH

Art. 247 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Durchführung

StPO; 5. Titel: Zwangsmassnahmen; 4. Kapitel: Durchsuchungen und Untersuchungen
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (478 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 247 StPO · Durchführung

Die Inhaberin oder der Inhaber kann sich vorgängig zum Inhalt der Aufzeichnungen äussern.

Zur Prüfung des Inhalts der Aufzeichnungen, insbesondere zur Aussonderung von Aufzeichnungen mit geschütztem Inhalt, können sachverständige Personen beigezogen werden.

Die Inhaberin oder der Inhaber kann der Strafbehörde Kopien von Aufzeichnungen und Ausdrucke von gespeicherten Informationen zur Verfügung stellen, wenn dies für das Verfahren ausreicht.

← Art. 246 StPO Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Geltungsbereich Art. 248 StPO →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (9)

ARMP.2025.71 · ne (Art. 247 al. 1 CPP)
Public Prosecutor's Order Annulled Over Refusal to Seal Seized Mobile Phone Data
Cited regarding the right of the holder to express themselves on the content of documents subject to a search.
SK2 2024 32 · gr (Art. 245-247 StPO)
Appeal Against Dismissal of Sealing Request in Negligent Arson Investigation
Cited in the reasoning section to establish the procedural context regarding the right to examine seized documents before searching them, relevant to the context of the sealing request reversal.
RBOG.2021.Nr.26 · tg (Art. 247 StPO)
Seizure Sealing Timeliness Appeal Regarding Absent Subject
Cited in the reasoning concerning the right of the owner to make a statement regarding the records prior to their search.
P/21307/2019 · ge (art. 247 al. 1 CPP)
Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Request to Seal Seized Electronic Devices
Cited to confirm the appellant had the right to express himself on the content of the data to be searched beforehand (though not in the dispositive, it justifies the finding in point 3.3 that the condition was not met).
D.cision.2014.1053 · vd (Art. 247 al. 3 CPP)
Prosecutor's Exclusion of Victim's Digital Evidence Upheld Against Defense Request
Cited in the reasoning (3.3) concerning the proportionality principle applied when deciding to return the victim's computer equipment after copying its contents.
D.cision.2011.104 · vd (Art. 247 al. 1 CPP)
Company Appeal on Order Compelling Production of Winemaking Records Due to Procedural Violation
The appeal was admitted and the order annulled because the right to express oneself prior to the search order was not respected under this article.
CCP.2005.45 · ne (Art. 247 al.2 CPP)
Attorney Appeal on Diminished Responsibility Due to Dementia Upheld
Cited in the reasoning to confirm that the appeal was filed within the legal time limits and form.
CCP.2003.72 · ne (art.247 al.4 CPP)
Acquittal for Physician in Postoperative Death Case
Cited as the basis for the court's restriction on ordering new evidentiary measures at this procedural stage.
CCP.2002.20 · ne (art. 247 al. 2 CPP)
Constraint Following Dispute Over Dog Defecation
Cited to declare the respondent's observations inadmissible due to being filed outside the deadline.