312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 243 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Zufallsfunde
StPO; 5. Titel: Zwangsmassnahmen; 4. Kapitel: Durchsuchungen und Untersuchungen
Art. 243 StPO · Zufallsfunde
Zufällig entdeckte Spuren oder Gegenstände, die mit der abzuklärenden Straftat nicht in Zusammenhang stehen, aber auf eine andere Straftat hinweisen, werden sichergestellt.
Die Gegenstände werden mit einem Bericht der Verfahrensleitung übermittelt; diese entscheidet über das weitere Vorgehen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (38)
OG ARGVP 1988 3109 · ar (Art. 243 StPO)
Administrative Appeal Fee Exemption vs. Expert Costs; Traffic Offense Appeal and Refusal to Testify
Cited as the basis for limiting the obligation of the injured party to bear costs to cases where their conduct caused or significantly complicated the proceedings.
BB.2024.21 (art. 243 CPP)
Seized Document Sealing and Legal Aid Denial
Cited as the legal basis for dealing with incidentally discovered items during a search.
SST.2022.132 · ag (Art. 243 Abs. 1 StPO)
Defendant Convicted of Speeding, Bodily Harm, and Possession of Pornography
Cited for the seizure of incidentally discovered items.
BK 2021 540 · be (Art. 243 StPO)
State v. Accused (Admissibility of Unlawfully Seized Traffic Violation Video)
Cited in the reasoning section (E. 4) regarding the seizure and handling of chance findings, which underpins the entire decision on the inadmissibility of the chance finding.
P/17291/2020 · ge (art. 243 CPP par analogie)
Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld Despite Evidence Collection Issues
Cited to confirm that the findings regarding the license plate and lighting were admissible as 'fortuitous discoveries'.
RBOG.2020.Nr.27 · tg (Art. 243 StPO)
State v. Defendant Regarding Unauthorized Driving Conviction Overturned Due to Flawed Mobile Phone Evidence Seizure
The appeal was granted and the appellant acquitted because the video evidence, which was based on a seizure/search, was deemed inadmissible.
RBOG.2020.Nr.27 · tg (Art. 243 StPO)
State v. Defendant Regarding Unauthorized Driving Conviction Overturned Due to Flawed Mobile Phone Evidence Seizure
This provision concerning random findings is central to the legal analysis leading to the conclusion that the video evidence was incorrectly gathered/inadmissible.
ARMP.2019.155 · ne (Art. 243 al. 1 CPP)
Firearms and iPhone Sequestration Dispute
Cited as the provision governing the treatment of incidentally discovered items (the weapons).
SB190225 · zh (Art. 243 Abs. 1 StPO)
Drug, Weapons, and Violent Imagery Offenses Appeal
Regulates the seizure of incidentally discovered items.
D.cision.2018.89 · vd (Art. 243 CPP)
Forensic Evidence Discovery in Estate Investigation Upheld
The court confirmed the lower court's finding that the discovered elements constituted fortuitous discoveries under this article, thereby rejecting the request for exclusion.
RBOG.2017.Nr.26 · tg (Art. 243 StPO)
State v. [Defendant's Name] (Evidence Admissibility in Traffic Violation Search)
Used in the reasoning regarding the definition and admissibility of ' Zufallsfunde' (accidental findings), although the main decision relies on the finding of an inadmissible evidence search rather than accidental finding for the exclusion.
BK 2015 62 · be (Art. 243 Abs. 2 StPO)
Victim DNA Order Overturned Due to Unlawful CODIS Fishing Expedition
Cited in the reasoning to address the competence for deciding on the admissibility of a random finding during the forensic identification process.
D.cision.2013.330 · vd (Art. 243 CPP)
Police Entry During Welfare Check and Admissibility of Fortuitously Discovered Drugs
Although cited in the reasoning as analogous for the discovery of evidence, it is not explicitly cited in the operative orders (I-VI).
D.cision.2012.722 · vd (Art. 243 al. 2 CPP)
Appeal Regarding Retention of Loan-Related Documents in Coercion Investigation
Cited implicitly in the reasoning as the provision the Public Prosecutor's Office must follow to decide on the next step concerning the incidentally discovered evidence, which is the core of the appeal's successful part.
OG ARGVP 2009 3548 · ar (Art. 243 Abs. 1 StPO)
Support Neglect Prosecution Costs Following Complaint Withdrawal
The court references this article concerning when costs can be imposed on the aggrieved party (the complainant) in the context of dismissing the appeal.