312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 24 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Bundesgerichtsbarkeit bei organisiertem Verbrechen, terroristischen Straftaten und Wirtschaftskriminalität
StPO; 2. Titel: Strafbehörden; 2. Kapitel: Sachliche Zuständigkeit
Art. 24 StPO · Bundesgerichtsbarkeit bei organisiertem Verbrechen, terroristischen Straftaten und Wirtschaftskriminalität
Der Bundesgerichtsbarkeit unterstehen zudem die Straftaten nach den Artikeln 260 ter, 260 quinquies, 260 sexies, 305 bis, 305 ter und 322 ter–322 septies StGB sowie die Verbrechen, die von einer kriminellen oder terroristischen Organisation im Sinne von Artikel 260 ter StGB ausgehen, wenn die Straftaten: a. zu einem wesentlichen Teil im Ausland begangen worden sind; b. in mehreren Kantonen begangen worden sind und dabei kein eindeutiger Schwerpunkt in einem Kanton besteht.
Bei Verbrechen des zweiten und des elften Titels des StGB kann die Staatsanwaltschaft des Bundes eine Untersuchung eröffnen, wenn: a. die Voraussetzungen von Absatz 1 erfüllt sind; und b. keine kantonale Strafverfolgungsbehörde mit der Sache befasst ist oder die zuständige kantonale Strafverfolgungsbehörde die Staatsanwaltschaft des Bundes um Übernahme des Verfahrens ersucht.
Die Eröffnung einer Untersuchung nach Absatz 2 begründet Bundesgerichtsbarkeit.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (58)
BG.2025.47 (art. 24 cpv. 1 CPP)
Federal Court Declares Jurisdiction Dispute Inadmissible Due to Untimeliness
This article is referenced in the context of when federal jurisdiction might be substantiated, particularly concerning organized criminal groups, although not directly applied in the final order.
BG.2025.47 (art. 24 cpv. 2 CPP)
Federal Court Declares Jurisdiction Dispute Inadmissible Due to Untimeliness
This article is cited in relation to the possibility of federal jurisdiction, which was considered when assessing the timeliness of the appeal.
SK.2024.25 (art. 24 cpv. 1 CPP)
Money Laundering: Border Cash Seizure and Drug Trafficking Links
This article lists further offenses subject to federal jurisdiction and was used to establish the court's jurisdiction.
BG.2024.16 (Art. 24 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO)
Federal Court Upholds Cantonal Jurisdiction in Money Laundering Case
Discussed and implicitly rejected as the basis for mandatory federal jurisdiction in this case.
BG.2024.72 (art. 24 cpv. 1 CPP)
Federal Jurisdiction Over Complex International Fraud Case Upheld
Federal jurisdiction is justified due to the international nature and complexity of the money laundering offenses.
BG.2024.72 (art. 24 cpv. 2 CPP)
Federal Jurisdiction Over Complex International Fraud Case Upheld
Federal jurisdiction is justified by the complex functioning and international ramifications of the economic crimes, requiring a unified federal procedure.
BG.2024.74 (art. 24 cpv. 1 CPP)
Federal Jurisdiction Over International Fraud and Money Laundering Case Upheld
Cited as the basis for federal jurisdiction due to the international nature of the money laundering acts and the collection/movement of funds abroad or through brokers in various cantons and abroad.
BG.2024.74 (art. 24 cpv. 2 CPP)
Federal Jurisdiction Over International Fraud and Money Laundering Case Upheld
Cited as a justification for federal jurisdiction due to the complexity and international ramifications of the case, requiring a unified and coordinated federal procedure.
BG.2023.35 (Art. 24 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO)
Zurich Retains Jurisdiction Over Covid-19 Fraud Case Despite Communication Lapses
Cited in relation to the transfer of jurisdiction for money laundering offenses when actions occur in multiple cantons without a clear focus.
BG.2023.35 (Art. 24 Abs. 2 StPO)
Zurich Retains Jurisdiction Over Covid-19 Fraud Case Despite Communication Lapses
Cited in relation to the transfer of jurisdiction for fraud offenses.
BG.2023.9 (Art. 24 al. 1 CPP)
Jurisdiction Dispute: Cantonal vs. Federal Authority in Cross-Border Fraud Case
Used to assess federal jurisdiction for specific serious crimes, including those committed abroad or in multiple cantons without clear predominance in one.
BG.2023.9 (Art. 24 al. 2 CPP)
Jurisdiction Dispute: Cantonal vs. Federal Authority in Cross-Border Fraud Case
Allows the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Confederation to open proceedings in certain cases, such as when no cantonal authority has initiated proceedings or a cantonal authority has requested the case be taken over.
BG.2023.18 (Art. 24 cpv. 1 lett. a CPP)
Federal vs. Provincial Jurisdiction in Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Case
This article establishes federal jurisdiction for certain offenses, including those committed predominantly abroad, which is relevant due to the international context of the alleged money laundering.
BG.2022.45 (Art. 24 Abs. 2 StPO)
Federal Jurisdiction Over International Fraud and Money Laundering Upheld
Cited as the legal basis for the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office to open an investigation into certain crimes, establishing federal jurisdiction.
BG.2022.45 (Art. 24 Abs. 3 StPO)
Federal Jurisdiction Over International Fraud and Money Laundering Upheld
Cited as the provision that establishes federal jurisdiction once an investigation is opened under Art. 24 Abs. 2 StPO.