312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 229 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Entscheid über die Anordnung der Sicherheitshaft
StPO; 5. Titel: Zwangsmassnahmen; 3. Kapitel: Freiheitsentzug, Untersuchungs- und Sicherheitshaft
Art. 229 StPO · Entscheid über die Anordnung der Sicherheitshaft
Über die Anordnung der Sicherheitshaft bei vorbestehender Untersuchungshaft entscheidet das Zwangsmassnahmengericht auf schriftliches Gesuch der Staatsanwaltschaft.
Ergeben sich erst nach der Anklageerhebung Haftgründe, so führt die Verfahrensleitung des erstinstanzlichen Gerichts in sinngemässer Anwendung von Artikel 224 ein Haftverfahren durch und beantragt dem Zwangsmassnahmengericht die Anordnung der Sicherheitshaft.
Das Verfahren vor dem Zwangsmassnahmengericht richtet sich: a. ohne vorbestehende Untersuchungshaft: sinngemäss nach den Artikeln 225 und 226; b. bei vorbestehender Untersuchungshaft: sinngemäss nach Artikel 227.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (134)
BKBES.2011.76 · so (Art. 229 StPO)
Continuation of Pre-Trial Detention Pending Institutional Treatment Order
Cited along with Art. 413 Abs. 4 StPO as a legal basis for maintaining pre-trial detention after the acceptance of the revision application.
BK 2025 303 · be (Art. 229 Abs. 3 Bst. b StPO)
Appeal Against Extension of Pre-Trial Detention for Robbery and Assault Charges
Cited by the appellant and implicitly considered in the context of proportionality and violation of the acceleration requirement when extending custody.
BK 2025 231 · be (Art. 229 Abs. 3 Bst. b StPO i.V.m. Art. 227 StPO)
Case Concerning Automatic Continuation of Detention After Indictment Withdrawal
Used to justify the analogue application regarding the continuation of detention proceedings despite the cessation of security detention following the return of the indictment.
SN.2024.9.3 (Art. 229 Abs. 3 lit. b StPO)
Extension of Pre-Trial Detention for Convicted Homicides and Torture
This provision is cited as the duration limitation also applies to security custody.
STBER.2024.8 · so (Art. 229 ff. StPO)
State v. Inmate (Arson Conviction Upheld)
Cited in the final concluding section regarding procedural aspects.
ARMP.2024.166 · ne (art. 229 al. 1 CPP)
Asylum Seeker's Appeal Against Security Detention Duration Rejected
Cited in the reasoning regarding the conditions under which the TMC rules on detention for security reasons.
SN.2024.9.1 (Art. 229 Abs. 3 lit. b StPO)
Continued Detention for Crimes Against Humanity Convict Amid Flight Risk Concerns
This provision is referenced in relation to the time limitation for pre-trial detention, applying also to security detention.
BK 2024 317 · be (Art. 229 al. 3 CPP)
Appeal Regarding Prolongation of Pre-Appeal Detention Post-Conviction
Cited in the reasoning regarding the procedural rules related to the right to be heard in detention matters.
SN.2024.9 (Art. 229 Abs. 3 lit. b StPO)
Murderer's Detention Extended Due to Flight Risk and Lengthy Sentence
Cited to confirm that the time limitation for pre-trial detention also applies to continued pre-trial detention.
SBK.2024.104 · ag (Art. 229 Abs. 3 StPO)
Detention Upheld Due to Flight Risk and Inadequate Less Restrictive Measures
Cited in the reasoning, implicitly relevant for the duration of detention.
CPR 2023 72 · ju (art. 229 al. 2 et 3 CPP)
Recusal Granted: Judge's Reference to Overturned Conviction Creates Appearance of Bias
References the competence of the first instance court to handle requests for prolonged detention for security reasons.
D.cision.2023.32 · vd (art. 229 CPP)
Pre-trial Detention Upheld for Flight Risk Despite Expulsion Orders
Cited in reasoning regarding the procedure for ordering security detention after indictment.
P/8646/2022 · ge (art. 229 al. 1 CPP)
Extension of Pre-Trial Detention Upheld Despite Flight Risk Mitigation Arguments
Cited in the context of explaining why the procedural timeline did not affect proportionality, referring to the request for safety detention.
CPR 2022 136 · ju (art. 229 al. 1 CPP)
Pre-trial Detention Upheld Due to Persistent Flight Risk
This article establishes the competence of the court of coercive measures to rule on detention for security reasons when it follows provisional detention, especially after the indictment.
SK1 2022 47 · gr (Art. 229 Abs. 2 StPO)
Confrontation Rights Violation in Aggravated Assault Conviction
Cited as the procedural basis for the lower court to request the continuation of custody from the judge for coercive measures.