312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 223 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Verkehr mit der Verteidigung im Haftverfahren
StPO; 5. Titel: Zwangsmassnahmen; 3. Kapitel: Freiheitsentzug, Untersuchungs- und Sicherheitshaft
Art. 223 StPO · Verkehr mit der Verteidigung im Haftverfahren
Die Verteidigung kann im Haftverfahren den Einvernahmen der beschuldigten Person und weiteren Beweiserhebungen beiwohnen.
Die beschuldigte Person kann im Verfahren vor der Staatsanwaltschaft und den Gerichten um Anordnung von Haft jederzeit ohne Aufsicht mit der Verteidigung schriftlich oder mündlich verkehren.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (56)
AbR.1982.83.Nr.36 · ow (Art. 223 Abs. 2 StPO)
Unlawful Arrest and Search of Minor
Used to establish that detention of juveniles requires particularly compelling reasons, which were not present in this case.
Arr.t.2010.1646 · vd (Art. 223 al. 1 CPP)
Appeal Against Seizure of Evidence Based on Claim of Diminished Capacity Dismissed
This article was used to justify the seizure of objects as they were deemed to be the product of a crime or used to commit one.
Arr.t.2010.1635 · vd (Art. 223 CPP)
Spousal Joint Account Seizure for Drug Proceeds Upheld
The court confirmed the sequestration order based on the authority granted by this article concerning the seizure of objects related to a crime.
Arr.t.2010.1553 · vd (Art. 223 CPP)
Appeal Dismissed Regarding Seizure Order in Breach of Trust and Theft Investigation
Cited in the preamble as the basis for the challenged decision (order of seizure).
Arr.t.2010.1475 · vd (Art. 223 CPP)
State v. Defendant (Passport Sequestration)
This provision justifies the initial order to seize the passport, as it relates to objects that can contribute to ascertaining the truth in the criminal investigation.
Arr.t.2010.1395 · vd (Art. 223 al. 1 CPP)
Appeal Regarding Seizure of Goods and Cash in Shoplifting Investigation
The seizure of the trousers was justified under this article, which concerns seizing items that may have served to commit an offense or contribute to discovering the truth.
Arr.t.2010.1402 · vd (Art. 223 al. 1 CPP)
Appeal Against Seizure Order for Seized Funds in Theft and Narcotics Investigation
Used to justify the seizure of the sum as potentially resulting from the crime of theft.
Arr.t.2010.1278 · vd (Art. 223 CPP)
State v. Hashish Seizure Appeal
This article is cited as the legal basis for upholding the seizure order, as the court rejected the appeal and confirmed the original decision based on its provisions.
Arr.t.2010.1175 · vd (Art. 223 CPP)
Proportionality in Website Closure Following Defamation Claim
Cited in the introductory part of the reasoning regarding the right of the judge to seize items, which relates to the underlying authority for the measures taken.
Arr.t.2010.1123 · vd (Art. 223 al. 1 CPP)
Prosecution Appeal Regarding Destruction of Sequestrated Knife Following Dismissal
Cited in the reasoning to establish the judge's right to seize items that can serve to establish the truth, justifying the maintenance of the seizure.
Arr.t.2010.1064 · vd (Art. 223 al. 1 CPP)
Appeal Regarding Seizure of Laptop Computer Linked to Theft Investigation
This article provided the legal basis for justifying the seizure of the computer as evidence related to the crime.
Arr.t.2010.1075 · vd (Art. 223 CPP)
Seizure of Counterfeit Currency Upheld
This provision, concerning the power of the judge to order seizures, is the substantive basis for upholding the seizure order being contested.
Arr.t.2010.1090 · vd (Art. 223 al. 1 CPP)
State v. Seized Rail Subscription Card
This provision was used to justify the seizure of the CFF subscription because the document was deemed evidence in the context of the investigation.
Arr.t.2010.1011 · vd (Art. 223 al. 1 CPP)
Appeal Regarding Seizure of Evidence in Arson and Theft Case
The article was cited as the legal basis for maintaining the seizure order for most items, partially upholding the initial decision.
Arr.t.2010.1003 · vd (Art. 223 al. 1 CPP)
Appellate Court Upholds Sequestration of Funds Pending Money Laundering Investigation Conclusion
This article provides the legal basis for the court's decision to maintain the criminal seizure on the bank account.