312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 202 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Frist
StPO; 5. Titel: Zwangsmassnahmen; 2. Kapitel: Vorladung, Vorführung und Fahndung
Art. 202 StPO · Frist
Vorladungen werden zugestellt: a. im Vorverfahren: mindestens 3 Tage vor der Verfahrenshandlung; b. im Verfahren vor Gericht: mindestens 10 Tage vor der Verfahrenshandlung.
Öffentliche Vorladungen werden mindestens einen Monat vor der Verfahrenshandlung publiziert.
Bei der Festlegung des Zeitpunkts wird auf die Abkömmlichkeit der vorzuladenden Personen angemessen Rücksicht genommen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (39)
ZZ.1978.20 · so (§ 202 Abs. 2 StPO)
Acquittal in Trademark Infringement Suit and Allocation of Costs
Cited in connection with the principle that the appellate court is generally free to change the costs decision to the detriment of the opposing party who did not appeal.
7B_209/2026 (Art. 202 Abs. 3 StPO)
Postponement of criminal appellate hearing denied despite counsel's documented scheduling conflict with mandatory defense in another case—violation of Art. 202(3) StPO and forced change of counsel.
Ground for the verdict; the court violated this provision by failing to adequately consider the counsel's availability when setting the hearing date.
BK 2025 348 · be (Art. 202 Abs. 3 StPO)
Regional Court Decision Affirmed on Presumed Withdrawal of Criminal Penalty Opposition Due to Unexcused Absence
This article regarding taking into account the availability of persons cited for fixing a hearing date was cited in the reasoning section (E. 5.3.4).
SBK.2025.141 · ag (Art. 202 Abs. 2 StPO)
Defendant's Due Process Rights Violated by Insufficient Notice for New Trial Hearing
Cited in the reasoning and implicitly used in the dispositive to determine the improper summoning of the defendant.
P/16913/2018 · ge (art. 202 al. 3 CPP)
Case Concerning Denial of Trial Postponement Due to Collaborating Attorney's Absence
Cited in the reasoning regarding the authority's obligation to appropriately consider the availability of cited persons when setting hearing dates.
P/16128/2020 · ge (Art. 202 al. 1 let. a CPP)
Appellant's Failure to Appear Due to Outdated Contact Information Upheld
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the validity of the second notification of the summons.
D.cision.2020.614 · vd (Art. 202 al. 2 CPP)
Art Theft Appellant Denied New Trial Due to Evasion of Justice
This provision was cited in the reasoning section to analyze the appellant's argument regarding the publication deadline for the public summons, which the court ultimately found justifiable to shorten due to urgency.
2020.04.21.sr.1 · bl (Art. 202 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO)
Prosecutor Recusal Denied Over Scheduling Dispute
Cited to establish the minimum legal timeframe for submitting summonses.
2020.04.21.sr.1 · bl (Art. 202 Abs. 3 StPO)
Prosecutor Recusal Denied Over Scheduling Dispute
Cited regarding the consideration of the availability of summoned persons when setting procedural dates.
BK 2020 23 · be (Art. 202 Abs. 1 StPO)
State v. Accused (Statute of Limitations and Procedural Cost Allocation)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the deadlines for a summons.
2020.01.21.sr.1 · bl (Art. 202 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO)
Robbery Conviction Upheld, Sentence Reduced Due to Procedural Delays
This provision sets the minimum time for serving summonses and is cited in the reasoning regarding participation rights.
460.2018.309 · bl (Art. 202 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO)
*State v. Johnson* - Robbery Conviction Affirmed, Sentence Reduced Due to Appeal Delay
Cited as the rule for the timing of summonses in the preliminary investigation, requiring at least three days' notice.
SK.2019.29 (Art. 202 Abs. 2 lit. a StPO)
Withdrawal of Opposition to Penal Order Results in Final Judgment
Cited as the legal basis for the right to lodge a complaint against the compensation decision for the official defense.
D.cision.2018.486 · vd (Art. 202 al. 1 let. b CPP)
Appellant v. Public Prosecutor (Illegality of Deemed Withdrawal of Opposition due to Insufficient Notice)
This article, applied analogously, sets the minimum notice period that was violated, leading to the annulment of the decision.
B.2018.83 · sg (Art. 202 Abs. 1 lit. a und b StPO)
Procurement Law Compliance Regarding Mandatory Site Inspection Scheduling
Cited in the reasoning to provide context regarding minimum deadlines in criminal proceedings.