312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 166 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Einvernahme der geschädigten Person
StPO; 4. Titel: Beweismittel; 3. Kapitel: Zeuginnen und Zeugen
Art. 166 StPO · Einvernahme der geschädigten Person
Die geschädigte Person wird als Zeugin oder Zeuge einvernommen.
Vorbehalten bleibt die Einvernahme als Auskunftsperson nach Artikel 178.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (22)
51/2007/22 · sh (Art. 166 StPO)
Personal Hearing Required for Premature Sentence Commencement
The appeal was granted and the challenged order reversed because the prerequisites for ordering the premature commencement of the sentence were not met under this article.
SB 2008 35 · gr (Art. 166 Abs. 1 StPO)
Journalist Defamation Appeal Dismissed Over Criticism of Professional Conduct and Proven Truth of Claims
Cited in the reasoning (Erwägung 6a) regarding the opportunity granted to the appellant to object to the admission to the exculpatory evidence.
SB 2008 35 · gr (Art. 166 Abs. 2 StPO)
Journalist Defamation Appeal Dismissed Over Criticism of Professional Conduct and Proven Truth of Claims
Cited in the reasoning (Erwägung 6a) regarding the necessary procedure if objections against the admission to the exculpatory evidence are raised.
SB 2008 35 · gr (Art. 166 Abs. 1 StPO)
Defamation Appeal Dismissed Over Criticism of Journalistic Conduct
Cited in the context of the opportunity granted to the appellant to raise objections against the admission to the exculpatory evidence.
P3 07 188 · vs (art. 166 CPP)
Review Authority Decision on Actionable Acts of Investigating Judge
The main ground for declaring the complaint inadmissible is that the appealed act did not qualify as a decision or measure subject to complaint under this article.
UK050187 · zh (§ 166 Abs. 1 StPO)
Pharmaceutical Company Advertising Illegality Dismissal Upheld
The court used this provision to outline the general requirements for the admissibility of an indictment, including the need for the described facts to be subsumable under a criminal offense.
SB 2006 18 · gr (Art. 166 Abs. 2 StPO)
Defamation Appeal: Exculpatory Evidence Admission Upheld, Costs Modified
Cited in the reasoning to establish jurisdiction for the decision on the admissibility of exculpatory evidence by the District Court Panel.
SB 2006 18 · gr (Art. 166 Abs. 2 StPO)
Admission of Exculpatory Evidence in Defamation Appeal Regarding Prior Procedural Statements
Cited in the reasoning to establish the procedural basis for the lower court's decision on the admissibility of exculpatory evidence.
SB 2005 37 · gr (Art. 166 Abs. 2 StPO)
Appeal on Denial of Exculpatory Evidence Presentation Due to Formal Submission Error
Cited as the basis for determining which written submissions are decisive for the admission to the evidence for exculpation.
SB 2005 37 · gr (Art. 166 Abs. 2 StPO)
Appeal on Denial of Exculpatory Evidence Presentation Due to Formal Submission Error
Cited in consideration 1 to establish the procedural framework (special proceeding) for deciding on the admissibility of evidence for exculpation.
SB 2005 37 · gr (Art. 166 Abs. 2 StPO)
Appeal Granted: Denial of Request for Exonerating Evidence Based on Formal Omission Overturned
Cited to determine the standard for admissibility of evidence in the appeal procedure.
P3 04 234 · vs (Art. 166 ss CPP)
Suspension of Proceedings Appeal Standard and Justification
Cited as the procedural basis governing the scope of review (limited to arbitrariness) for an appeal against the decision to suspend proceedings when no specific appeal route is provided.
SB 2004 20 · gr (Art. 166 Abs. 2 StPO)
Plaintiffs v. Accused (Defamation Justification Defense)
Cited as the procedural basis allowing the District Court Committee to rule on the admissibility of exculpatory evidence based solely on written submissions.
OG ARGVP 2003 3432 · ar (Art. 166 Abs. 1 StPO)
State v. Defendant (DUI BAC Fabrication)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the principle of free evaluation of evidence, which underpins the court's decision on the facts.
OG ARGVP 2002 3406 · ar (Art. 166 Abs. 1 StPO)
R. v. Driver on Unsecured Vehicle Causing Undetermined Damage
Cited as a procedural rule governing the court's free evaluation of evidence.