312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 165 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Schweigegebot für die Zeugin oder den Zeugen
StPO; 4. Titel: Beweismittel; 3. Kapitel: Zeuginnen und Zeugen
Art. 165 StPO · Schweigegebot für die Zeugin oder den Zeugen
Die einvernehmende Behörde kann eine Zeugin oder einen Zeugen unter Hinweis auf die Strafdrohung von Artikel 292 StGB verpflichten, über die beabsichtigte oder die erfolgte Einvernahme und deren Gegenstand Stillschweigen zu bewahren.
Die Verpflichtung wird befristet.
Die Anordnung kann mit der Vorladung der Zeugin oder des Zeugen verbunden werden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (59)
STAPP.2007.10 · so (§ 165 StPO)
Accused Alone Appeals Unconditional Fine; Appellate Court Increases Conditional Fine Without Violating *Reformatio in Peius*
The court referenced this provision to assess whether modifying the unconditional fine into a conditional fine constituted a prohibited reformatio in peius.
AGVE.2006.15 · ag (§ 165 Abs. 1 StPO)
Insurer's Standing in Criminal Proceedings for Subrogated Claims
Determines that only 'private law' claims are to be decided in an adhesion judgment.
STAPA.2004.51 · so (§ 165 StPO)
Appellate Review of Offense Qualification vs. Prohibition on *Reformatio in Peius* in Sentencing and Money Laundering Aggravating Factors
This procedural provision was cited in the context of rejecting the objection based on the prohibition of reformatio in peius against changing the legal qualification.
STAPA.2000.62 · so (§ 165 StPO)
Suspended Sentence with Fine Permissible on Appeal Over Unconditional Sentence
This provision established the rule against worsening the defendant's situation on appeal, which the court addressed to justify combining a conditional prison sentence with a fine.
51/2001/13 · sh (Art. 165 Abs. 1 StPO)
Detainee Mail and Appeal Deadline Rules
This article, regarding the authorization and control of communications for detainees, forms the basis for the court's ruling on the restriction of mail.
51/2000/27 · sh (Art. 165 StPO)
Inmate Access to Defense-Retained Psychiatrist
Cited as the basis for regulating visits to detained persons and communications with the defense lawyer.
DG.2014.2 · bs (§ 165 Abs. 2 in Verbindung mit § 35 StPO BS)
Mootness of Reopening Request to Substitute Inpatient for Outpatient Treatment
Cited for the rule that the applicant must bear the costs of the proceedings because the application was essentially withdrawn.
10.2010.643 · ti (art. 165 cpv. 2 CPP)
Theft, Damage, Trespass, and Driving After Revocation with Suspended Sentence
Cited in order 6 to order the release of seized shoes upon final judgment.
17.2010.32 · ti (art. 165 cpv. 2 CPP TI)
Vehicle Ownership Dispute in Criminal Context
The court ordered the judicial deposit (deposito) of the vehicle key, which is the procedural measure specified in this article for cases where the right to restitution is doubtful or contested.
72.2010.84 · ti (art. 165 cpv. 1 e 4 CPP)
State v. Defendant: Attempted Double Homicide and Weapons Charges
Applied to order the release and return of specific property (phone and SIM card) to PC 1, as they were not subject to confiscation, in order 6.
10.2009.19 · ti (art. 165 CPP)
Fraud Acquittal Due to Insufficient Evidence and Altered Payment Terms
Cited in the formal decision structure ('visti') regarding the acquittal.
72.2008.63 · ti (art. 94, 165 cpv. 2, 260, 264, 266, 270, 272 CPP)
Fraudulent Bankruptcy, Forgery, and Assault Conviction
Cited among the procedural provisions governing the judgment and sentencing process.
INC.2007.3002 · ti (Art. 165 CPP)
Partial Release of Seized Funds Following Settlement in Embezzlement Case
Cited as the procedural basis for ordering the release of CHF 100,000 to the civil party.
INC.2007.59101 · ti (art. 165 cpv. 1 CPP)
Property Seizure Release Denial in Fraud/Money Laundering Case
This article governs the general procedure for challenging seizure decisions, which provides the framework for the ruling.
INC.2007.59101 · ti (art. 165 cpv. 2 CPP)
Property Seizure Release Denial in Fraud/Money Laundering Case
This article governs the general procedure for challenging seizure decisions, which provides the framework for the ruling.