Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
312.0 STPOCPP CH

Art. 146 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Einvernahme mehrerer Personen und Gegenüberstellungen

StPO; 4. Titel: Beweismittel; 1. Kapitel: Allgemeine Bestimmungen
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (478 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 146 StPO · Einvernahme mehrerer Personen und Gegenüberstellungen

Die einzuvernehmenden Personen werden getrennt einvernommen.

Die Strafbehörden können Personen, einschliesslich solcher, die ein Aussageverweigerungsrecht haben, einander gegenüberstellen. Die besonderen Rechte des Opfers bleiben vorbehalten.

Sie können einvernommene Personen, die nach Abschluss der Einvernahme voraussichtlich weiteren Personen gegenübergestellt werden müssen, verpflichten, bis zur Gegenüberstellung am Ort der Verfahrenshandlung zu bleiben.

Die Verfahrensleitung kann eine Person vorübergehend von der Verhandlung ausschliessen, wenn: a. eine Interessenkollision besteht; oder b. diese Person im Verfahren noch als Zeugin, Zeuge, Auskunftsperson oder sachverständige Person einzuvernehmen ist.

← Art. 145 StPO Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Geltungsbereich Art. 147 StPO →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (237)

UE240309 · zh (Art. 146 Abs. 4 StPO)
Appeal Regarding Discontinuation of Proceedings in Attempted Coercion Case Due to Procedural Violations
Cited as a provision under which the right to participation can be restricted, referenced in the context of limitations on evidence gathering rights (and specifically in relation to exclusion of parties).
UE240309 · zh (Art. 146 Abs. 4 lit. b StPO)
Appeal Regarding Discontinuation of Proceedings in Attempted Coercion Case Due to Procedural Violations
Cited to explain the possibility for the procedural leader to temporarily exclude a person from hearings, which forms the basis for the requirement to grant confrontation rights subsequently.
SK 2023 481 · be (Art. 146 Abs. 4 StPO)
State v. [Defendant Name]: Cannabis Cultivation and Trafficking Conviction Upheld, Gang Enhancement Denied
Cited in the reasoning regarding the limitation of participation rights.
P/10653/2023 · ge (art. 146 al. 4 CPP)
Accused's Right to Attend Witness Hearings During Investigation
Cited as one of the legal provisions allowing restrictions on the right to participate in evidence administration.
P/10653/2023 · ge (art. 146 al. 4 let. a CPP)
Accused's Right to Attend Witness Hearings During Investigation
Cited in the context of assessing the necessity of exclusion based on collision of interests, though deemed not met.
P/15550/2022 · ge (Art. 146 CPP)
Appeal Against Refusal to Institute Criminal Proceedings for Dangerous Driving
Cited as a procedural provision detailing the right to the administration of relevant evidence, referenced during the review of the right to be heard.
ARMP.2022.130 · ne (Art. 146 al. 4 let. a CPP)
Appeal Against Procedural Restriction on Witness Questioning in Fraud Case
Cited as a possibility for temporary exclusion from hearings (collision of interests).
ARMP.2022.130 · ne (Art. 146 al. 4 let. b CPP)
Appeal Against Procedural Restriction on Witness Questioning in Fraud Case
Cited as a possibility for temporary exclusion from hearings (person still to be heard as an informant).
STBER.2021.34 · so (Art. 146 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Abs. 2 StPO)
Prosecution Appeal on Crediting of Pre-Sentence Measure Execution Against Custodial Sentence
Cited in the preamble as a basis for the decision.
D.cision.2021.10 · vd (Art. 146 al. 4 CPP)
Prosecutor's Discretion in Restricting Co-Defendant Interview Participation Upheld
Cited in the reasoning as a legal basis for excluding a person from debates due to collision of interests.
BES.2021.66 · bs (Art. 146 StPO)
Detainee Appeal of Extended Pre-Trial Detention Based on Right to Be Heard Violation
This provision concerning the right to be heard was mentioned by the appellant in relation to the alleged denial of the right to be heard, although the court ultimately found the appeal unfounded on this point.
502 2020 233 · fr (Art. 146 al. 4 CPP)
Appeal of Dismissal of Abuse Proceedings and Prosecutor Recusal Request
Cited in the reasoning (section 2.2) regarding inadmissibility of evidence.
502 2021 23 · fr (Art. 146 al. 1 CPP)
Appeal Against Exclusion from Co-Defendant Interrogation
Cited in the reasoning (point 1.3) to distinguish it from the right to participate in evidence taking (Arts. 147 and 148 CPP).
502 2021 23 · fr (Art. 146 al. 4 CPP)
Appeal Against Exclusion from Co-Defendant Interrogation
Mentioned in the reasoning (point 3.1 and 3.3.2) as a provision that could justify restricting participation.
D.cision.2021.26 · vd (Art. 146 al. 4 CPP)
Appeal Concerning Admissibility of Passenger Testimony from Preliminary Investigation
Cited as a legal basis for restricting the right to participate in evidence administration.