Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
312.0 STPOCPP CH

Art. 14 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Bezeichnung und Organisation der Strafbehörden

StPO; 2. Titel: Strafbehörden; 1. Kapitel: Befugnisse
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (478 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 14 StPO · Bezeichnung und Organisation der Strafbehörden

Bund und Kantone bestimmen ihre Strafbehörden und deren Bezeichnungen.

Sie regeln Wahl, Zusammensetzung, Organisation und Befugnisse der Strafbehörden, soweit dieses Gesetz oder andere Bundesgesetze dies nicht abschliessend regeln.

Sie können Ober- oder Generalstaatsanwaltschaften vorsehen.

Sie können mehrere gleichartige Strafbehörden einsetzen und bestimmen für diesen Fall den jeweiligen örtlichen und sachlichen Zuständigkeitsbereich; ausgenommen sind die Beschwerdeinstanz und das Berufungsgericht.

Sie regeln die Aufsicht über ihre Strafbehörden.

← Art. 13 StPO Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Geltungsbereich Art. 15 StPO →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (106)

AbR.1982.83.Nr.34 · ow (Art. 14 StPO)
Guardianship and Legal Capacity to File Criminal Complaint
Cited in the context of the time limit for a legal representative to file a complaint or approve a timely complaint.
ZZ.1990.35 · so (§ 14 StPO)
Compensation Entitlement in Mixed Criminal and Civil Proceedings
Cited as the prerequisite condition under which the injured party can claim compensation under § 37 Abs. 2 StPO.
ZZ.1984.23 · so (§ 14 StPO)
Women's Movement Appeal Standing for Indecent Publication and Endangering Minors Acquittal
Cited to establish that only those immediately damaged by the offense are entitled to exercise party rights.
BG.2025.84 (Art. 14 Abs. 4 StPO)
Jurisdiction Dispute Between Cantons Over Fraud Case
This provision determines which cantonal authorities can represent their canton in jurisdiction matters, relevant for assessing the parties' standing.
BG.2025.76 (Art. 14 Abs. 4 StPO)
Zurich v. Aargau: Jurisdictional Dispute Over Financial Crimes
This provision concerns the determination of which authorities are authorized to represent a canton in jurisdictional dispute resolution.
BG.2025.79 (art. 14 al. 4 CPP)
Vaud v. Bern: Jurisdictional Dispute over Bicycle Thefts
Determines which authorities are legitimized to represent their canton in intercantonal jurisdiction disputes.
BG.2025.71 (art. 14 cpv. 4 CPP)
Federal Criminal Court Rules Lucerne Competent to Prosecute Sexual Assault Case
This article is cited in relation to cantonal legislation determining the authority to represent a canton in jurisdiction proceedings.
BG.2025.46 (Art. 14 Abs. 4 StPO)
Canton's Request for Jurisdiction Dismissed for Insufficient Substantiation
Cited in the reasoning to explain how the competent authorities to represent a canton in jurisdiction matters are determined.
BG.2025.49 (Art. 14 al. 4 CPP)
Federal Criminal Court Denies Jurisdiction Transfer in COVID-19 Loan Fraud Case
This article is mentioned in relation to determining which authorities are legitimized to represent their canton in jurisdiction disputes.
BG.2025.35 (Art. 14 Abs. 4 StPO)
Jurisdictional Dispute Between Zurich and Aargau Resolved in Favor of Zurich
Determines who represents a canton in exchange of opinions and before the appellate division.
BG.2025.8 (Art. 14 Abs. 4 StPO)
Jurisdiction over Fraud and Forgery Case: St. Gallen's Authority Upheld
Cited regarding the determination of which authorities are authorized to represent their canton in jurisdiction proceedings.
BG.2025.42 (Art. 14 al. 4 CPP)
Federal Criminal Court: Bern Competent to Prosecute Vaudois Criminal Case Involving Human Trafficking Allegations
Cited to determine which authorities are legitimized to represent their canton in jurisdiction disputes.
P3 25 162 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO)
Cantonal Court Upholds Penalty Order Based on Statutory Fiction of Delivery
Cited in the reasoning concerning the decision-making body for appeals against decisions on objection validity.
BG.2025.30 (Art. 14 al. 4 CPP)
Jurisdiction over Psychic Fraud Schemes: Fribourg Declared Competent
This article specifies that cantonal legislation determines which authorities are authorized to represent their canton in jurisdiction disputes, relevant to the standing of the involved public prosecutors.
BG.2025.33 (Art. 14 Abs. 4 StPO)
Schwyz Jurisdiction Upheld Amidst Inter-Cantonal Proceedings
This provision determines which authorities are authorized to represent their canton in jurisdiction conflict proceedings.