311.0
STGBCP
CH
CH
Art. 78 Schweizerisches Strafgesetzbuch (StGB)
StGB; Erster Teil: Verbrechen und Vergehen; Vierter Titel: Vollzug von Freiheitsstrafen und freiheitsentziehenden Massnahmen; 2. Vollzug von Freiheitsstrafen.; Einzelhaft
Art. 78 StGB
Einzelhaft als ununterbrochene Trennung von den anderen Gefangenen darf nur angeordnet werden: a. bei Antritt der Strafe und zur Einleitung des Vollzugs für die Dauer von höchstens einer Woche; b. zum Schutz des Gefangenen oder Dritter; c. als Disziplinarsanktion; d. zur Verhinderung der Beeinflussung von Mitgefangenen durch Gedankengut, das die Ausübung von terroristischen Aktivitäten begünstigen kann, sofern konkrete Anhaltspunkte auf eine solche Beeinflussung vorliegen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)
VD.2024.181 · bs (Art. 78 StGB)
Appeal Against Retroactive Maximum-Security Solitary Confinement Based on Planned Aerial Escape Threat
Cited in the context of the legal basis for the specific measure of solitary confinement (Einzelhaft) being applied.
VD.2024.181 · bs (Art. 78 lit. b StGB)
Appeal Against Retroactive Maximum-Security Solitary Confinement Based on Planned Aerial Escape Threat
This provision served as the legal basis for the respondent's decision to order the appellant's placement in the maximum security unit (Einzelhaft) for the protection of third parties.
VB.2024.00061 · zh (Art. 78 lit. b StGB)
Appeal Against Continued Solitary Confinement Due to Insufficient Justification and New Medical Findings
The court found that the prerequisites for solitary confinement (Einzelhaft) according to this article were not met.
459----------- · vd (art. 78 CP)
Appeal Against Security Cell Isolation for Violent Inmate
The rejection of the appeal implies that the placement in solitary confinement did not violate this article regarding the grounds for ordering such isolation.
VD.2022.116 · bs (Art. 78 StGB)
Administrative Court Review of Maximum-Security Inmate Placement Following Arson Incident
The legal basis cited in the challenged decision for the placement in the special security unit (Einzelhaft).
VB.2021.00245 · zh (Art. 78 lit. b StGB)
Inmate's Quarantine Unjustified Despite COVID-19 Exposure
Cited as a provision related to measures during detention, potentially relevant to the justification of quarantine.
VB.2020.00444 · zh (Art. 78 lit. b StGB)
Detainee Transfer Legality and Jurisdiction
This provision is cited in the summary of the decision, indicating it was the basis for the ruling concerning the factual issue (the confinement in the security unit).
SK 2020 267 · be (art. 78 let. b du Code pénal suisse (CP ; RS 311.0))
Swiss Supreme Court Upholds Extended Cell Confinement for Aggressive Inmate
Cited as a potential legal basis for the measure, examined in conjunction with Art. 35 LEJ.
VB.2016.00124 · zh (Art. 78 lit. b StGB)
Zurich Administrative Court Upholds Solitary Confinement in High-Security Unit Due to Escape Risk
Cited as a legal basis for the imposition of the measure (Einzelhaft).
VB.2011.00486 · zh (Art. 78 lit. b StGB)
Inmate Segregation Upheld Despite Granted Legal Aid
This provision is the substantive legal basis for the decision to detain the appellant in the security unit.
VB.2011.00486 · zh (Art. 78 lit. b StGB)
Prisoner Placement in Secure Unit Upheld Despite Appeal
This article likely forms the substantive basis for the decision to order the confinement in the security division, as it is listed among the legal norms applied.
VB.2016.00124 · zh (Art. 78 lit. b StGB)
Confinement in Secure Unit Solitary Confinement Appeal Admissibility
This article provides the legal basis for the imposition of solitary confinement in the high-security unit, which was ultimately upheld.