311.0
STGBCP
CH
CH
Art. 75a Schweizerisches Strafgesetzbuch (StGB)
StGB; Erster Teil: Verbrechen und Vergehen; Vierter Titel: Vollzug von Freiheitsstrafen und freiheitsentziehenden Massnahmen; 2. Vollzug von Freiheitsstrafen.; Besondere Sicherheitsmassnahmen
Art. 75a StGB
Die Kommission nach Artikel 62 d Absatz 2 beurteilt im Hinblick auf die Einweisung in eine offene Strafanstalt und die Bewilligung von Vollzugsöffnungen die Gemeingefährlichkeit des Täters, wenn: a. dieser ein Verbrechen nach Artikel 64 Absatz 1 begangen hat; und b. die Vollzugsbehörde die Frage der Gemeingefährlichkeit des Gefangenen nicht eindeutig beantworten kann.
Vollzugsöffnungen sind Lockerungen im Freiheitsentzug, namentlich die Verlegung in eine offene Anstalt, die Gewährung von Urlaub, die Zulassung zum Arbeitsexternat oder zum Wohnexternat und die bedingte Entlassung.
Gemeingefährlichkeit ist anzunehmen, wenn die Gefahr besteht, dass der Gefangene flieht und eine weitere Straftat begeht, durch die er die physische, psychische oder sexuelle Integrität einer anderen Person schwer beeinträchtigt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (86)
VB.2024.00544 · zh (Art. 75a Abs. I StGB)
Prisoner Transfer Denial Upheld Due to Lack of Resocialization Participation
This article concerns provisions related to sentence execution, likely related to the decision on release measures.
VB.2024.00544 · zh (Art. 75a Abs. II StGB)
Prisoner Transfer Denial Upheld Due to Lack of Resocialization Participation
This article concerns provisions related to sentence execution, likely related to the decision on release measures.
PS/88/2024 · ge (Art. 75a al. 1 CP)
Appeal Dismissed: Revocation of Transfer to Open Custody Upheld Due to Threats and Recidivism Risk
The provision establishing the commission responsible for assessing dangerousness for placement in open institutions, which informs the review of the revocation.
PS/19/2024 · ge (art. 75a al. 2 CP)
Appellant Denied Supervised Outing Due to Deterioration in Conduct
Cited in the context of classifying the requested 'conduite' as an easing of the regime of deprivation of liberty.
VB.2023.00586 · zh (Art. 75a Abs. II StGB)
Denial of Conditional Release Based on Recidivism Risk
This provision is cited, suggesting it was relevant to the legal framework considered in the decision.
601 2023 113 · fr (Art. 75a Abs. 1 Bst. a StGB)
Appeal Against Refusal of Open Prison Transfer Dismissed; Delay Complaint Moot; Legal Aid Granted.
Cited in the reasoning concerning the assessment of dangerousness related to sentence openings (Vollzugsöffnungen).
601 2023 113 · fr (Art. 75a Abs. 2 StGB)
Appeal Against Refusal of Open Prison Transfer Dismissed; Delay Complaint Moot; Legal Aid Granted.
Cited in the reasoning defining 'Vollzugsöffnungen' (sentence openings) such as transfer to an open institution.
PM/150/2023 · ge (Art. 75a al. 1 let. b CP)
Conditional Release Denial Overturned Due to Lack of Expert and CED Opinion
Cited as a basis for finding that the execution authority could not make a categorical statement on the dangerousness of the detainee, thus requiring the opinion of the CED.
VD.2023.76 · bs (Art. 75a StGB)
In re: Appellant's Request for Transfer to Supervised Housing and Unescorted Outings
The court implicitly reviewed the denial of release extensions based on this article, as it is the primary statutory basis mentioned for the subject matter of the appeal (progressive execution).
PS/79/2023 · ge (art. 75a al. 2 CP)
Detainee v. Sentence and Measures Enforcement Service (Supervised Outing Refusal)
Cited in context with Art. 84 al. 6 CP, as the leave constitutes a lessening of the penalty regime.
VB.2023.00194 · zh (Art. 75a Abs. II StGB)
Remand for New Expert Evaluation on Incarcerated Individual's Release Eligibility
This provision is cited as part of the legal framework relevant to the decision on custody provisions, which is the subject of the case.
PS/67/2023 · ge (Art. 75a CP)
Public Ministry v. Detainee Release Appeal
The court confirmed the decision to grant the furlough without consulting the Danger Assessment Commission (CED) based on the exception provided in Art. 75a al. 1 let. b CP, which is implicitly supported by the reasoning against the appellant's argument referencing this article.
PS/17/2023 · ge (art. 75a CP)
Public Prosecutor v. Convict Regarding Unescorted Leave and Risk Assessment Requirement
Cited in the context of the applicability of provisions regarding the assessment of dangerousness by the CED for granting concessions in the execution of measures.
PS/17/2023 · ge (art. 75a al. 1 let. b CP)
Public Prosecutor v. Convict Regarding Unescorted Leave and Risk Assessment Requirement
The court upheld the decision to grant non-accompanied leaves by finding that the granting authority could clearly rule on the danger level, thus justifying the waiver of the CED opinion required by Art. 75a al. 1 CP for dangerous inmates.
PS/52/2022 · ge (art. 75a al. 1 CP)
Public Prosecutor v. Detainee Transfer to Open Custodial Environment
The court implicitly applied this provision by confirming the decision, as the public prosecutor argued that the lower court violated this article by not consulting the CED when it could not rule categorically on the detainee's dangerousness.