Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
311.0 STGBCP CH

Art. 72 Schweizerisches Strafgesetzbuch (StGB)

StGB; Erster Teil: Verbrechen und Vergehen; Dritter Titel: Strafen und Massnahmen; Zweites Kapitel: Massnahmen; 5. Einziehung.; b. Einziehung von Vermögenswerten.; Einziehung von Vermögenswerten einer kriminellen oder terroristischen Organisation
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (474 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 72 StGB

Das Gericht verfügt die Einziehung aller Vermögenswerte, welche der Verfügungsmacht einer kriminellen oder terroristischen Organisation unterliegen. Bei Vermögenswerten einer Person, die sich an einer solchen Organisation beteiligt oder sie unterstützt hat (Art. 260 ter), wird die Verfügungsmacht der Organisation bis zum Beweis des Gegenteils vermutet.

← Art. 71 StGB Schweizerisches Strafgesetzbuch (StGB) Art. 73 StGB →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (64)

VPB 2512-2001-2610 (Art. 72 CP)
Criminal and Military Penal Code Amendments: Aligning Prescription Periods
Cited as being abrogated, leading to the need for adaptation of other articles regarding prescription.
STAPA.2001.74 · so (Art. 72 Ziff. 2 Abs. 1 StGB)
Appellate Court Quashes Forgery Proceedings Due to Expired Limitation Period
This article defines the interruption of the relative statute of limitations, which is the substantive ground for concluding that the prosecution had expired.
CHAC.1999.3693 · ne (Art. 72 ch. 1 CP)
Complainant v. Prosecutor Regarding Interruption of Limitation Period in Defamation Case
The court relied on this article, interpreted in light of ATF 90 IV 62, to conclude that the public prosecutor's suspension order caused the prescription period of the criminal action to be suspended.
ZZ.1974.16 · so (Art. 72 Ziff. 2 StGB)
Police Report Does Not Interrupt Statute of Limitations for Prosecution
This article defines the actions that interrupt the statute of limitations, which is the central legal issue determined by the court.
SK.2024.14 (Art. 72 CP)
Improper Notification Voids Penal Order, Case Remanded for Further Investigation
Cited in relation to the confiscation of assets belonging to an organization or its members.
CA.2023.20 (art. 72 CP)
Appellate Court Defers Decision Pending Supreme Court Review
Cited in the dispositive for the confiscation of assets related to the account of 'société 1'.
ARMP.2024.59 · ne (Art. 72 CP)
Prosecutor v. Individual Regarding Unregistered and Uninsured Vehicle
Cited in the reasoning section concerning confiscation based on criminal origin or use.
STK 2022 53 · sz (Art. 72 Abs. 1 StGB)
Prosecution v. Accused: Appeal of Theft, Trespassing, and Deportation Ruling
Used to confirm the conditional deportation order against the accused.
SK.2022.15 (Art. 72 CP)
Confiscation of Swiss Bank Account Funds Linked to Criminal Organization Upheld
Basis for ordering the confiscation of assets controlled by a criminal organization.
BB.2021.72 (Art. 72 CP)
Federal Criminal Court Annuls Confiscation of Funds Due to Lack of Proof of Criminal Organization's Control
Used to annul the confiscation order because the conditions for confiscating assets controlled by a criminal organization were not met.
BB.2020.225 (Art. 72 CP)
Federal Court Upholds Seizure of Insurance Policy Amidst Organized Crime Allegations
Basis for confiscation of assets belonging to criminal organizations.
BB.2020.62 (Art. 72 CP)
Swiss Court Upholds Confiscation of Money Laundering Assets Linked to Italian Mafia
Cited as the basis for confiscating assets belonging to a criminal organization, with a presumption that assets of individuals involved are at the organization's disposal.
SK.2019.26 (art. 72 CP)
Criminal Organization, Theft, and Detention Compensation Appeal
Cited in the dispositive for the confiscation of assets.
BB.2019.64 (art. 72 CP)
Confiscation of Mafia-Linked Assets Upheld
Applied to presume that the assets were at the disposal of the criminal organization, justifying confiscation.
SK.2016.30 (art. 72 CP)
Bank Fraud and Forgery Convictions and Acquittals
Used to order the confiscation of funds seized in application of this article.