311.0
STGBCP
CH
CH
Art. 385 Schweizerisches Strafgesetzbuch (StGB)
StGB; Achter Titel: Begnadigung, Amnestie, Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens; 3. Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens
Art. 385 StGB
Die Kantone haben gegenüber Urteilen, die auf Grund dieses oder eines andern Bundesgesetzes ergangen sind, wegen erheblicher Tatsachen oder Beweismittel, die dem Gericht zur Zeit des früheren Verfahrens nicht bekannt waren, die Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens zu Gunsten des Verurteilten zu gestatten.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (17)
VPB 05-0131-869 (Art. 385, al. 2, CP)
Implementation of Life Imprisonment for Extremely Dangerous Offenders
Regulates the conditions for revision of judgments related to lifelong internment, specifically concerning post-judgment evidence on amendability.
P/6408/2020 · ge (art. 385 et 396 al. 1 CP)
Prosecutor's Expert Appointment and Document Access Upheld
Cited in the reasoning section explaining the timeliness of the appeal, which is preliminary to the decision on inadmissibility.
Jug.2021.10 · vd (Art. 385 CP)
Revision Denied for Civil Service Law Infractions Based on Drug Use Allegations
Cited in the preamble to the orders, concerning the standard for reviewing facts/evidence in revision proceedings (though the requests were declared inadmissible on procedural grounds).
D.cision.2017.707 · vd (Art. 385 al. 1 CP)
Detainee v. Public Prosecutor (Prison Staff Search)
Used to confirm the admissibility of the appeal based on its formal requirements.
AbR.2012.13.Nr.23 · ow (Art. 385 StGB)
Driver's Speed, Not Just Road Condition, Caused Accident
Cited in the context of allowing revision based on new facts or evidence discovered after the initial judgment, even if its direct applicability is debated post-StPO.
BES.2014.130 · bs (Art. 385 StGB)
Revision Based on New Evidence of Wrong Driver Overturns Traffic Penalty
Cited in the reasoning as the substantive basis regarding the reopening of criminal proceedings based on new facts.
D.cision.2014.178 · vd (art. 385 al. 1 CP)
Indigent Appellant Granted Defense Counsel for Fraud Investigation
Cited to confirm the formal requirements for the admissibility of the appeal.
Jug.2013.148 · vd (art. 385 CP)
Revision Denial for Life Sentence Based on Unproven Judicial Hypothesis
Cited in the preamble to the orders as part of the legal basis for reviewing the revision request.
R.v.p.nale.2010.9 · vd (Art. 385 CP)
Trademark Infringement Revision Denial Based on Standing and New Evidence
The court rejected the revision request based on the insufficiency of the serious facts/evidence presented under this article.
R.v.p.nale.2010.7 · vd (Art. 385 CP)
Complainant's Attempt to Revise Defamation Case Dismissal Upheld
Cited in the heading, but not explicitly used in the final orders (dispositive) for the ruling itself.
R.v.p.nale.2010.3 · vd (Art. 385 CP)
Revision Denial for New Testimony in Bodily Harm Case
Cited as the basis for the right to appeal regarding revision against a conviction under federal penal law.
R.v.p.nale.2009.14 · vd (Art. 385 CP)
Revision of Theft Conviction Based on Employment Alibi
The request for revision was admitted based on this article, which establishes the right to revision.
R.v.p.nale.2009.9 · vd (Art. 385 CP)
Penal Review Commission Upholds Dismissal of Review Request Regarding Undocumented Worker Employment
This article sets the minimum requirement for cantonal revision proceedings, which is discussed in the reasoning but not the direct basis for the final order of dismissal.
R.v.p.nale.2009.4 · vd (Art. 385 CP)
Revision Denial Based on Change in Jurisprudence Not Constituting New Fact
This article establishes the right to revision, although the review was ultimately rejected under cantonal law.
R.v.p.nale.2009.5 · vd (art. 385 CP)
Revision of Alien Conviction Denied Due to Previously Considered Marital Status Claim
Cited as the federal basis requiring cantons to provide for a review procedure, although the procedural dismissal was based on cantonal law.