Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
311.0 STGBCP CH

Art. 162 Schweizerisches Strafgesetzbuch (StGB)

StGB; Zweiter Titel: Strafbare Handlungen gegen das Vermögen; 2. Verletzung des Fabrikations- oder Geschäftsgeheimnisses
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (474 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 162 StGB

Wer ein Fabrikations- oder Geschäftsgeheimnis, das er infolge einer gesetzlichen oder vertraglichen Pflicht bewahren sollte, verrät,wer den Verrat für sich oder einen andern ausnützt,wird, auf Antrag, mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu drei Jahren oder Geldstrafe bestraft.

← Art. 161bis StGB Schweizerisches Strafgesetzbuch (StGB) Art. 163 StGB →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (85)

P/20478/2019 · ge (art. 162 CP)
Appellant Acquitted of Trade Secret Violation and False Statement; Complainant's Appeal Dismissed.
A acquitté A______ de la violation du secret de fabrication ou du secret commercial (main ground for the verdict).
BS 2024 111 · zg (Art. 162 StGB)
Prosecutor's Decision to Discontinue Proceedings Challenged by Company Against Former Executives for Unfair Competition and Breach of Trust
Cited in the reasoning regarding the violation of trade or business secrets.
RR.2024.106 (Art. 162 Abs. 2 StGB)
Switzerland v. United States: Insider Trading and Money Laundering Extradition
This provision concerns the betrayal or exploitation of trade secrets.
P/20430/2019 · ge (art. 162 CP)
Trade Secrets Violation and Unfair Competition Conviction Upheld, Traffic Offense Affirmed.
The appellant was declared guilty of the violation of trade or manufacturing secrets based on this provision.
BG.2023.35 (Art. 162 StGB)
Zurich Retains Jurisdiction Over Covid-19 Fraud Case Despite Communication Lapses
Defines the offense of violating trade secrets.
S2 2023 30 · zg (Art. 162 Abs. 2 StGB)
Management Breach and Trade Secret Theft in Mass Medical Practice Defection
H.________ and J.________ were convicted of violation of trade and business secrets under this article in orders III.3.2 and IV.4.2, respectively.
501 2022 115 · fr (art. 162 al. 1 CP)
Acquittal for Receiving Stolen Goods and Trade Secret Violation in Civil Litigation Context
A.________ was acquitted of the charge of violation of manufacturing or trade secrets based on this article in order 1 of the dispositive.
STK 2022 62 · sz (Art. 162 StGB)
Appeal Dismissal Due to Withdrawal and Cost Allocation
Cited as the underlying criminal offense (Breach of trade and business secrets) to justify imposing compensation costs.
SST.2022.174 · ag (Art. 162 StGB)
Former Employee Convicted of Attempted Coercion Against Bank
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the illegality of the means used, specifically related to professional secrecy.
501 2022 53 · fr (art. 162 CP)
Trade Secret Violation and Expense Indemnity Appeal
Cited in order I.1 as the offense for which A.________ was convicted, which is the basis for the cost indemnity decision.
SBK.2021.288 · ag (Art. 162 StGB)
Trade Secret Theft Allegations Rejected Due to Insufficient Evidence
This provision is the substantive criminal offense at issue in the case.
UE210159 · zh (Art. 162 StGB)
Public Prosecutor's Discretion Upheld in Employment Dispute Defamation Case
Substantive law used to assess the alleged violation of business secrets.
SK.2020.36 (Art. 162 Abs. 1 StGB)
Former Board Member Convicted of Trade Secret Violations, Espionage, and Insider Trading
The court found the defendant guilty of multiple counts of violating the manufacturing or business secret.
SK.2020.36 (Art. 162 Abs. 2 StGB)
Former Board Member Convicted of Trade Secret Violations, Espionage, and Insider Trading
The court found the defendant B. guilty of multiple counts of violating the manufacturing or business secret.
Jug.2021.393 · vd (art. 162 al. 1 CP)
Trade Secret Misappropriation Acquittal Upheld
The appeal was rejected because the second constituent element of the offense under this article was not met, leading to confirmation of the acquittal.