Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
291 IPRGLDIP CH

Art. 9 Bundesgesetz vom 18. Dezember 1987 über das Internationale Privatrecht (IPRG)

IPRG; 1. Kapitel: Gemeinsame Bestimmungen; XI. Rechtshängigkeit
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (247 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 9 IPRG

Ist eine Klage über denselben Gegenstand zwischen denselben Parteien zuerst im Ausland hängig gemacht worden, so setzt das schweizerische Gericht das Verfahren aus, wenn zu erwarten ist, dass das ausländische Gericht in angemessener Frist eine Entscheidung fällt, die in der Schweiz anerkennbar ist.

Zur Feststellung, wann eine Klage in der Schweiz hängig gemacht worden ist, ist der Zeitpunkt der ersten, für die Klageeinleitung notwendigen Verfahrenshandlung massgebend. Als solche genügt die Einleitung des Sühneverfahrens.

Das schweizerische Gericht weist die Klage zurück, sobald ihm eine ausländische Entscheidung vorgelegt wird, die in der Schweiz anerkannt werden kann.

← Art. 8c IPRG Bundesgesetz vom 18. Dezember 1987 über das Internationale Privatrecht (IPRG) Art. 10 IPRG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (58)

OG 1994 12 · lu (Art. 9 Abs. 3 IPRG)
Recognition of Foreign Divorce Decree Based on Improper Service
The court order implicitly requires applying this article to overturn the initial non-entry into proceedings based on the non-recognized foreign judgment.
HC.2023.123 · vd (Art. 9 LDIP)
Husband's Temporary Occupancy of Marital Home Upheld Based on Domicile and Medical Needs
Cited in the background provisions section, but not explicitly used in the dispositive orders I-V.
127----------- · vd (Art. 9 LDIP)
Divorce Proceeding Jurisdiction and Lis Pendens in International Private Law
Cited in the reasoning regarding the application of international private law for the suspension of proceedings due to pre-existing foreign litigation, which forms the basis of the dispute's outcome.
C/26163/2005 · ge (art. 9 al. 1 LDIP)
Succession Jurisdiction: Swiss Court vs. Foreign Proceedings
Cited in the reasoning for procedural suspension, although the court ultimately annulled the decision to suspend because the court itself was found to be incompetent under Art. 88 al. 1 LDIP.
LC210008 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 3 IPRG)
Foreign Divorce Judgment Does Not Bar Swiss Court Jurisdiction on Financial Matters
Cited as the basis for recognizing a foreign divorce decision.
C/8225/2018 · ge (art. 9 LDIP)
Appeal Regarding Suspension of Protective Measures Pending Spanish Provisional Measures Case
This provision was cited in the reasoning section related to the justification for suspending the case due to international lis pendens, which was the main issue confirmed in the final order.
LC180026 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 1 IPRG)
Father v. Mother (Custody Modification Under Hague Convention)
Cited to confirm that Swiss jurisdiction was established given that the action was filed first in Switzerland.
LC180026 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 2 IPRG)
Father v. Mother (Custody Modification Under Hague Convention)
Cited to support that the Swiss proceedings were initiated before the Polish proceedings, confirming Swiss jurisdiction.
C/49/2018 · ge (Art. 9 LDIP)
Appeal Against Suspension of Proceedings Based on Lis Pendens in Foreign Execution Case
The court explicitly rejected the exception of lis pendens, which was based on this article, in its final order.
C/25781/2017 · ge (Art. 9 LDIP)
Divorce Proceedings Suspension Overruled Due to Lack of English Jurisdiction
The court rejected the international lis pendens exception, which the lower court had based on this article, by finding the prerequisites (competence of the foreign court) were not met.
9.2017.103 · ti (Art. 9 LDIP)
Guardianship Jurisdiction and Sufficiency in Cross-Border Case
The court used this article to determine that litispendence with the Italian proceedings did not require suspension of the Swiss procedure because the latter was unlikely to result in a recognizable decision in a timely manner.
RVJ 2019 p 146 151 · vs (Art. 9 LDIP)
Divorce Case Conversion for Accessory Relief Following Foreign Decree Recognition
Cited to establish that a divorce proceeding suspended pending a foreign judgment dissolving the marriage can be continued concerning only the accessory effects.
C/11255/2016 · ge (art. 9 al. 1 LDIP)
Divorce Jurisdiction and Lis Pendens Confirmation in Swiss-Russian Case
Cited in the reasoning concerning the suspension of proceedings due to prior foreign litigation, relevant to the rejection of the lis pendens exception.
C/11255/2016 · ge (art. 9 al. 2 LDIP)
Divorce Jurisdiction and Lis Pendens Confirmation in Swiss-Russian Case
Cited in the reasoning concerning the date a case is deemed introduced in Switzerland, relevant to the rejection of the lis pendens exception.
C/11255/2016 · ge (art. 9 al. 3 LDIP)
Divorce Jurisdiction and Lis Pendens Confirmation in Swiss-Russian Case
Cited in the reasoning regarding the cessation of proceedings upon recognition of a foreign decision, relevant to the rejection of the lis pendens exception.