291
IPRGLDIP
CH
Art. 66 Bundesgesetz vom 18. Dezember 1987 über das Internationale Privatrecht (IPRG)
IPRG; 4. Kapitel: Kindesrecht; I. Zuständigkeit; 1. Grundsatz
Art. 66 IPRG
Für Klagen auf Feststellung oder Anfechtung des Kindesverhältnisses sind die schweizerischen Gerichte am gewöhnlichen Aufenthalt des Kindes oder am Wohnsitz der Mutter oder des Vaters zuständig.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)
C/13329/2023 · ge (art. 66 LDIP)
Father's Paternity and Child Support Obligation Affirmed Despite Foreign Obligations
Cited to confirm the jurisdiction of the Geneva courts.
CACIV.2011.34 · ne (Art. 66 LDIP)
Paternity Action Against Heirs Involving Conflict of Laws and Res Judicata
Cited in the dispositive order 2 as the basis for determining the jurisdiction of Swiss courts in filiation actions.
HC.2011.343 · vd (Art. 66 LDIP)
Jurisdiction and Representation in Paternity Action by Undocumented National
Cited in the heading, but the court used Art. 24 CC and factual findings, not Art. 66 LDIP, as the ground for rejecting the competence challenge (Point 3).
CC.2006.71 · ne (Art. 66 LDIP)
Paternity Establishment and Child Support Under Ukrainian Law
This article establishes jurisdiction for actions concerning the establishment or contestation of filiation, allowing them to be brought before the Swiss court of one of the parents' domicile in international disputes.
CC.2009.143 · ne (art. 66 LDIP)
Annulment of Paternity Recognition Based on Disproven DNA Evidence and Litigation Misconduct
Cited in the reasoning regarding the alternative forum for jurisdiction, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.
HC.2010.150 · vd (Art. 66 LDIP)
Paternity Action Jurisdiction and Habitual Residence in Switzerland
This article established the basis for jurisdiction (forum) in paternity cases, which was central to the lower court's decision confirmed by the appeal court.
CC.2008.79 · ne (Art. 66 LDIP)
Paternity Judgment Revision Based on DNA Evidence Overriding Finality
Cited in the reasoning to establish the admissibility based on jurisdiction (though not directly in the operative part, it is contextually relevant to the case setup, but given the strict rule, we look closely at the operative part).
39.2002.89 · ti (Art. 66 LDIP)
Social Security Calculation Based on Unpursued Paternity Action
Cited to establish the jurisdiction of Swiss courts for paternity actions when the child resides in Switzerland.
CC.1999.1027 · ne (art. 66 LDIP)
Maternity Establishment and Paternity Declaration Against Deceased Parents via Private International Law
Cited in the reasoning to determine competent courts for an action in maternity when parties are foreigners.
14.1996.113 · ti (art. 66 LDIP)
Partial Recognition of Italian Bankruptcy Decrees
Although only Art. 66 al. 1 LTF (which is not in this decision) typically covers costs, in this case, costs are governed by the last order (point 4) which cites Art. 66 LDIP as a general procedural context, although the actual cost imposition is based on the final disposition and general court practice, not explicitly on a specific cost article cited in the dispositive orders 1-5.
11.1995.226 · ti (art. 66 LDIP)
Paternity Challenge Appeal Dismissed Due to Presumption and Untimeliness
This article was cited in the reasoning to confirm the lower court's competence regarding applicable law, which supports the final decision.
32.2002.135 · ti (Art. 66 cpv. 2 LDIP)
Appeal Against Maintenance of 50% Disability Pension for Ankylosing Spondylitis
The court did not levy a judicial fee (Tassa di giustizia) but did not explicitly cite the relevant cost article in the dispositive orders (Order 2/implied no cost but stated costs are placed on the State).