291
IPRGLDIP
CH
CH
Art. 63 Bundesgesetz vom 18. Dezember 1987 über das Internationale Privatrecht (IPRG)
IPRG; 3. Kapitel: Eherecht; IV. Nebenfolgen
Art. 63 IPRG
Die für Klagen auf Scheidung oder Trennung zuständigen schweizerischen Gerichte sind auch für die Regelung der Nebenfolgen zuständig. Die Bestimmungen dieses Gesetzes über den Minderjährigenschutz (Art. 85) bleiben vorbehalten.
Für den Ausgleich von Vorsorgeansprüchen gegenüber einer schweizerischen Einrichtung der beruflichen Vorsorge sind sie ausschliesslich zuständig.
Die Nebenfolgen der Scheidung oder Trennung unterstehen schweizerischem Recht. Die Bestimmungen dieses Gesetzes über den Namen (Art. 37–40), die Unterhaltspflicht der Ehegatten (Art. 49), das eheliche Güterrecht (Art. 52–57), die Wirkungen des Kindesverhältnisses (Art. 82 und 83) und den Minderjährigenschutz (Art. 85) sind vorbehalten.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (49)
LC230013 · zh (Art. 63 Abs. 1bis IPRG)
Recognition of Foreign Divorce Decree and Ancillary Disputes Over Property and Support
Cited regarding the mandatory Swiss jurisdiction and law for the equalization of pension benefits.
LC230013 · zh (Art. 63 Abs. 2 IPRG)
Recognition of Foreign Divorce Decree and Ancillary Disputes Over Property and Support
Cited regarding the mandatory Swiss jurisdiction and law for the equalization of pension benefits.
C/19751/2022 · ge (art. 63 al. 2 LDIP)
Child Support Obligation vs. Adult Child Maintenance
Cited in the reasoning section to establish the applicable law (Swiss law).
608 2022 194 · fr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 IPRG)
Cantonal Court Jurisdiction Over Pension Division with Foreign Claims
Cited to establish that Swiss courts have jurisdiction over ancillary matters in divorce cases involving foreign pension entitlements.
A/854/2023 · ge (art. 63 al. 1bis LDIP)
Pension Splitting Jurisdiction in Divorce Following French Decree
Although discussed in the reasoning to establish jurisdiction, it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.
LC220012 · zh (Art. 63 Abs. 1bis IPRG)
Foreign Pensions and Asset Division in Divorce
Determines the exclusive jurisdiction of Swiss courts for pension asset equalization concerning Swiss pension institutions.
LC220012 · zh (Art. 63 Abs. 2 IPRG)
Foreign Pensions and Asset Division in Divorce
Specifies that the law applicable to the divorce generally governs the pension asset equalization, including for foreign claims.
C/9265/2020 · ge (Art. 63 al. 1 LDIP)
Pension Division and Usufruct Extinguishment in Divorce Appeal
Cited in the reasoning regarding the competence for matrimonial liquidation incidental to divorce.
C/26849/2019 · ge (art. 59, 63 al. 1 et 79 al. 1 LDIP)
Child Support Modification Appeal Regarding Childcare Expenses and Future Needs
Cited in the reasoning regarding the competence of the Geneva judicial authorities.
C/15759/2019 · ge (art. 63 al. 1bis LDIP)
Pension Asset Division Following Divorce
Cited to establish the court's jurisdiction over the appeal regarding the professional pension assets.
C/15759/2019 · ge (art. 63 al. 2 LDIP)
Pension Asset Division Following Divorce
Cited to establish that Swiss law is applicable to the dispute.
C/22141/2018 · ge (art. 59, 63 al. 1 et 64 al. 1 LDIP)
Divorce Judgment Modification Child Support Retroactivity and Impingement on Vital Minimum
Cited to confirm the jurisdiction of Genevan courts.
LC190025 · zh (Art. 63 IPRG)
Divorce Appeal Dismissed: Sole Custody to Father Following Unilateral Relocation and Parental Conflict
Cited in relation to the application of Swiss law even when jurisdiction deviates from the child's habitual residence, referencing the Hague Convention on Protection of Children.
C/23668/2017 · ge (art. 60, 63, 83 LDIP)
Divorce Appeal: Parental Rights, Custody Residence, and Spousal Support Modification
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the application of Swiss law.
A/1293/2020 · ge (Art. 63 al. 1bis de la loi fédérale sur le droit international privé du 18 décembre 1987 (LDIP - RS 291))
Swiss Pension Division Jurisdiction Post-Divorce
Though cited extensively in the reasoning regarding jurisdiction, it is not explicitly repeated in the dispositive orders 1-4.