Art. 175 Bundesgesetz vom 18. Dezember 1987 über das Internationale Privatrecht (IPRG)

14.2008.116 · ti (Art. 175 LDIP)

Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Proceedings (Italy)

Used to apply the same rules as for bankruptcy recognition (Art. 166 et seq. LDIP) to the recognition of the Italian extraordinary administration procedure, which is considered analogous to a concordat.

PS230145 · zh (Art. 175 IPRG)

Creditor Appeal on Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Proceeding and Jurisdiction Over Branch Location

Provision governing the recognition of the foreign deed of company arrangement (DOCA), which was the subject of the appeal.

14.2018.191 · ti (art. 175 LDIP)

Recognition of Italian Extraordinary Administration Procedure vs. Swiss Public Policy

Cited in reasoning points 1 and 3, relating to the application of bankruptcy/insolvency law to concordatory proceedings (though not explicitly in the dispositive, it is used in the context of substantive law applied in the decision, which is indirectly related to the rejected appeal).

C/30546/2010 · ge (art. 175 LDIP)

Recognition of Brazilian Restructuring Plan Denied Due to Lack of Executory Documentation

Used by analogy to determine that the recognition of the foreign composition approval is governed by Articles 166 to 170 LDIP.

A/2912/2012 · ge (Art. 175 LDIP)

Appeal Dismissed Due to Inadmissibility and Lack of Standing

This provision concerns the recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings (concordat), which was the basis for the appellant's lack of standing to sue.

14.2011.11 · ti (art. 173 e 175 LDIP)

Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Distribution Plan

These articles are cited as the legal basis for recognizing the foreign liquidation/concordat status and authorizing the foreign administrator.

14.2009.29 · ti (art. 175 LDIP)

Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Proceedings and Appointment of Commissioners

Article used to determine that the Italian extraordinary administration procedure is analogous to a composition agreement and thus subject to recognition under this provision (Orders 1.1, 1.2, 1.3).

14.2006.35 · ti (Art. 175 LDIP)

Recognition of Italian Insolvency Composition Agreements in Switzerland

Cited in the reasoning preamble alongside other articles before the final orders, and implicitly used as the basis for recognizing the foreign concordat decision in orders 2.1, 3.1, and 4.1.

RBOG.2005.Nr.35 · tg (Art. 175 IPRG)

Enforceability of German Insolvency Order under Lugano Convention and IPRG

This article is used in connection with Art. 166 IPRG to assess the legitimacy of the debtor to request recognition of the foreign insolvency order.

14.2008.116 · ti (Art. 175 LDIP)

Recognition of Italian Extraordinary Administration in Switzerland for Criminal Case Representation and Asset Preservation

Cited as the primary basis for recognizing the Italian decision, which concerns a procedure analogous to a concordat.

14.2009.29 · ti (art. 175 LDIP)

Recognition of Italian Insolvency Proceedings Under Extraordinary Administration (Switzerland)

The main legal basis used to recognize the foreign decision concerning an analogous restructuring procedure (amministrazione straordinaria).

14.2011.11 · ti (art. 175 LDIP)

Recognition of Foreign Administration Liabilities Schedule and Distribution Plan

Cited in the final orders as the legal basis for applying the recognition to the arrangement with surrender of assets.

14.2018.191 · ti (art. 175 LDIP)

Swiss Creditors Challenge Recognition of Italian Insolvency Proceedings

Cited as the provision governing the recognition of foreign concordat decisions by analogy, relevant to the scope of review and existing provisions.

15.2017.25 · ti (art. 175 LDIP)

Debtor's Appeal Against Property Auction Sale Following Tax Execution and Exclusion Action in Co-Owned Property

Cited in the reasoning section regarding foreign decisions approving a composition or analogous procedure.

RBOG.2005.Nr.35 · tg (Art. 175 IPRG)

Recognition of German Payment Order Despite Insolvency Proceedings

Mentioned in the context of determining who is legitimized to apply for recognition of protective measures like composition agreements, by analogy with insolvency proceedings.