291
IPRGLDIP
CH
Art. 170 Bundesgesetz vom 18. Dezember 1987 über das Internationale Privatrecht (IPRG)
IPRG; 11. Kapitel: Konkurs und Nachlassvertrag; III. Rechtsfolgen; 1. Im Allgemeinen
Art. 170 IPRG
Die Anerkennung des ausländischen Konkursdekrets zieht, soweit dieses Gesetz nichts anderes vorsieht, für das in der Schweiz gelegene Vermögen des Schuldners die konkursrechtlichen Folgen des schweizerischen Rechts nach sich.
Die Fristen nach schweizerischem Recht beginnen mit der Veröffentlichung der Entscheidung über die Anerkennung.
Der Konkurs wird im summarischen Verfahren durchgeführt, sofern nicht die ausländische Konkursverwaltung oder ein Gläubiger nach Artikel 172 Absatz 1 vor der Verteilung des Erlöses beim Konkursamt das ordentliche Verfahren verlangt und für die voraussichtlich ungedeckten Kosten hinreichende Sicherheit leistet.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (68)
40/2001/9 · sh (Art. 170 Abs. 1 IPRG)
Recognition of German Insolvency Decree and Incidental Application in Avoidance Action
Cited in the reasoning concerning the consequences of recognizing a foreign bankruptcy decree.
PS180130 · zh (Art. 170 Abs. 1 IPRG)
Recognition of Foreign Bankruptcy Decree Affirmed Despite Default Judgment Claim
This provision was cited in relation to the appellants' liability for costs of the auxiliary bankruptcy proceedings.
14.2010.85 · ti (art. 170 LDIP)
Closure of Swiss Secondary Bankruptcy Liquidation Despite Transfer Delay
Cited in the pronouncement section as the legal basis for the decision regarding the secondary bankruptcy procedure.
14.2010.70 · ti (art. 170 LDIP)
Closing of Secondary Bankruptcy Proceedings Upon Distribution of Assets
This article is cited in the preamble to the ruling as it relates to the application of Swiss bankruptcy law (LEF) to the secondary bankruptcy.
14.2006.62 · ti (art. 170 LDIP)
Closure of Secondary Bankruptcy Proceedings Upon Asset Transfer
This provision is cited in the formal ruling section and relates to the application of Swiss bankruptcy law (LEF) to recognized foreign bankruptcies.
14.2005.6 · ti (art. 170 LDIP)
Closure of Secondary Bankruptcy Proceeding Following Asset Transfer
Cited as part of the legal basis for the decision.
14.2005.6 · ti (art. 170 LDIP)
Closure of Secondary Bankruptcy Proceeding Following Asset Transfer
Cited in the preamble as part of the legal basis for the decision.
14.2005.6 · ti (art. 170 LDIP)
Closure of Secondary Bankruptcy Proceeding Following Asset Transfer
Cited in the preamble to establish the applicable legal framework for the closure of the secondary bankruptcy.
14.2005.6 · ti (art. 170 LDIP)
Closure of Secondary Bankruptcy Proceeding Following Asset Transfer
Cited in the preamble, relating to the applicability of Swiss bankruptcy law provisions.
14.2005.6 · ti (art. 170 LDIP)
Closure of Secondary Bankruptcy Proceedings Post-Asset Distribution
Cited as a legal basis, relating to the applicability of Swiss bankruptcy law in cases of foreign bankruptcy recognition.
14.2010.70 · ti (art. 170 LDIP)
Closure of Secondary Bankruptcy After Transfer of Funds to Foreign Administrator
Cited in the 'Per questi motivi' section regarding the basis for the decision, specifically concerning the application of LEF provisions.
14.2010.70 · ti (art. 170 LDIP)
Closure of Secondary Bankruptcy After Transfer of Funds to Foreign Administrator
This provision mandates the application of Swiss execution law (LEF), which forms the basis for the closure in dispositive 1.
14.2010.74 · ti (art. 170 LDIP)
Closure of Swiss Secondary Bankruptcy Proceeding Following Liquidation Completion
Cited in the final orders as a basis for the decision (concerning the application of domestic law).
KSK 2019 108 · gr (Art. 170 Abs. 1 IPRG)
Mortgage Enforcement Nullified Due to Debtor's Death and Foreign Bankruptcy Decree
Cited to establish that the recognition of the foreign bankruptcy decree entails Swiss bankruptcy law consequences, triggering Art. 206 SchKG.
14.2019.155 · ti (art. 170 cpv. 1 LDIP)
Appeal Regarding Enforcement of Foreign Insolvency Order Against Third-Party Debtor
The court found this provision inapplicable because the recognition of the foreign proceeding was final at the time the challenged decision was issued.