291
IPRGLDIP
CH
CH
Art. 128 Bundesgesetz vom 18. Dezember 1987 über das Internationale Privatrecht (IPRG)
IPRG; 9. Kapitel: Obligationenrecht; II. Anwendbares Recht
Art. 128 IPRG
Ansprüche aus ungerechtfertigter Bereicherung unterstehen dem Recht, dem das bestehende oder das vermeintliche Rechtsverhältnis unterstellt ist, aufgrund dessen die Bereicherung stattgefunden hat.
Besteht kein Rechtsverhältnis, so unterstehen die Ansprüche aus ungerechtfertigter Bereicherung dem Recht des Staates, in dem die Bereicherung eingetreten ist; die Parteien können vereinbaren, dass das Recht am Gerichtsort anzuwenden ist.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (8)
C/16442/2013 · ge (art. 128 LDIP)
Appeal on Fraudulent Contracts and Jurisdictional Limits
This article concerning claims based on unjust enrichment was cited in relation to the applicable law.
BZ.2008.3 · sg (Art. 128 IPRG)
Claimant's Legitimacy to Sue Bank Accounts vs. Void Loan Agreements Under German Law
Cited as the rule determining that claims arising from unjust enrichment are governed by the law applicable to the purported legal relationship (the void loan agreement).
BZ.2009.27 · sg (Art. 128 Abs. 2 IPRG)
Jurisdiction and Unjust Enrichment Claims Under Lugano Convention and National Laws
The rule applied by the court to determine the applicable law for unjust enrichment claims when no existing legal relationship between the parties is present.
BZ.2007.56 · sg (Art. 128 Abs. 1 IPRG)
Set-Off of Unauthorized Debit Claim Against Suretyship Obligation Under Austrian Law
This article was considered in relation to the applicable law for unjust enrichment claims connected to a pre-existing legal relationship.
BZ.2007.56 · sg (Art. 128 Abs. 1 IPRG)
Debtor v. Bank: Surety Set-Off Dispute Governed by Austrian Law
Cited in the reasoning concerning the applicable law for unjust enrichment claims.
14.2004.17 · ti (art. 128, 133, 158 LDIP)
Vessel Charter Overpayment Seizure Upheld on Fraudulent Enrichment Claim
Cited as the provisions of the Swiss Private International Law Act relevant to determining applicable law for unjust enrichment.
14.2000.00126 · ti (Art. 128 LDIP)
Creditor v. Niece: Sequestration of Assets for Unjust Enrichment
Cited to determine the applicable law for the unjust enrichment claim.
14.2004.17 · ti (Art. 128 LDIP)
Creditor Attachment of Debtor Assets Upheld Based on Probable Unjust Enrichment Claim Arising from Fraudulent Charter Fees
Cited in the final pronouncement regarding the conflict of laws rule concerning unjust enrichment claims.