Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
281.35 GEBVSCHKGOELPOTLEFGebV CH

Art. 20 Gebührenverordnung vom 23. September 1996 zum Bundesgesetz über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (GebV SchKG) - Vollzug der Pfändung

GebV SchKG; 2. Kapitel: Gebühren des Betreibungsamtes
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (66 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 20 GebV SchKG · Vollzug der Pfändung

Die Gebühr für den Vollzug einer Pfändung, einschliesslich Abfassung der Pfändungsurkunde, bemisst sich nach der Forderung und beträgt:Forderung/FrankenGebühr/Frankenbis10010.–über100bis50025.–über500bis1 00045.–über1 000bis10 00065.–über10 000bis100 00090.–über100 000bis1 000 000190.–über1 000 000400.–

Die Gebühr für eine fruchtlose Pfändung beträgt die Hälfte der Gebühr nach Absatz 1, jedoch mindestens 10 Franken. Für einen erfolglosen Pfändungsversuch beträgt die Gebühr 10 Franken.

Erfordert der Vollzug mehr als eine Stunde, so erhöht sich die Gebühr um 40 Franken für jede weitere halbe Stunde.

Die Gebühr für die Protokollierung des Fortsetzungsbegehrens, das infolge Zahlung, Rückzug des Fortsetzungsbegehrens, Einstellung oder Aufhebung der Betreibung zu keiner Pfändung führt, beträgt 5 Franken.

← Art. 19 GebV SchKG Gebührenverordnung vom 23. September 1996 zum Bundesgesetz über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (GebV SchKG) - Geltungsbereich Art. 21 GebV SchKG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (21)

BGE 150 III 223 (Art. 20 GebV SchKG)
Debt collection fee schedule for payment orders, attachment notices, loss certificates, and travel expenses: statutory basis required for charges on voluntary actions like A-Post delivery and collection invitations.
Applied to uphold the separate charge for attachment notices, since this provision covers only the attachment execution itself, not the preliminary notice.
PS240063 · zh (Art. 20 Abs. 1 GebV SchKG)
Debt Enforcement Office Fee Dispute for Garnishment Revision
This provision is referenced as the basis for calculating the fee for revising an income garnishment.
PS240063 · zh (Art. 20 Abs. 3 GebV SchKG)
Debt Enforcement Office Fee Dispute for Garnishment Revision
This provision, concerning additional fees for longer execution times, is discussed in relation to the disputed 'Mehraufwand' charge.
15.2022.89 · ti (art. 20 cpv. 1 e 2 OTLEF)
Creditor's Appeal of No Assets Certificate and Execution Costs Dismissed
Cited in consideration 2 to justify the fee charged for the unsuccessful execution of the seizure.
A/1734/2021 · ge (art. 20 OELP)
Creditor Challenge to Enforcement Office's Certificate of No Assets Due to Insufficient Investigation and Flawed Fee Demand
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the standard fee for seizure execution, relevant to the issue of the challenged advance of costs.
15.2018.19 · ti (art. 20 cpv. 3 OTLEF)
Creditors' Appeal Regarding Insufficient Asset Investigation by Enforcement Office
Cited in the reasoning regarding the potential increase of the enforcement fee for extended actions.
30.2015.15 · ti (art. 20 cpv. 1 OTLEF)
Partial Upholding of Appeal Regarding Refund of Mandatory Minimum Social Insurance Contributions and Fees for 2007 and 2009
This article regarding seizure execution fees was used in the reasoning to determine the nature of the Fr. 23,65 expense for 2007.
A/993/2014 · ge (art. 20 OELP)
Creditor Challenge to Enforcement Cost Advance for Seizure Inventory
Cited in the reasoning to justify the calculation of the Office's emoluments.
15.2012.59 · ti (art. 20 cpv. 1 e 2 OTLEF)
Creditor Challenge to Exclusion of Television from Seizure Based on Realization Costs
Cited in the preamble but not in the dispositive, relating to seizure tax.
15.2007.26 · ti (art. 20 cpv. 1 e 2 OTLEF)
Debtor Appeal Regarding Deficit Certificates and Seizure Costs in Unsuccessful Executions
Cited as the basis for recalculating and correcting the seizure execution fees due to the sequestration being unsuccessful.
SKA 2006 28 · gr (Art. 20 GebV SchKG)
Bankruptcy Office Procedural Violations and Voiding of Bankruptcy Acts
This is a potential typo/misinterpretation. The actual cited provision regarding costs is Art. 20a Abs. 2 Ziff. 5 SchKG, and Art. 61/62 GebV SchKG.
SKA 2006 28 · gr (Art. 20 GebV SchKG)
Bankruptcy Office Procedural Violations and Voiding of Bankruptcy Acts
This is not explicitly in the dispositive. Article 26 of the cantonal implementing ordinance (GVV zum SchKG) is mentioned in conjunction with Art. 20a Abs. 2 Ziff. 5 SchKG, Art. 61 Abs. 2 lit. a and Art. 62 Abs. 2 GebV SchKG.
15.2001.00204 · ti (Art. 20 OTLEF)
Debtor's Appeal of Execution Accounting Including Court Costs and Attorney's Fees Dismissed
Cited in the final orders as the legal basis for procedural acts in the execution proceedings, specifically relating to the costs calculation upheld by the court.
12.1999.193 · ti (art. 20 OTLEF)
Landlord-Tenant Dispute Over Lease Termination and Rent Reduction for Apartment Defects
Cited in the reasoning (section 3.6) concerning levying seizure costs, but not explicitly cited in the final orders.
15.2001.00204 · ti (art. 20 OTLEF)
Debtor's Appeal Regarding Execution Costs in Debt Calculation Denied
Cited among the provisions used to validate enforcement expenses (avviso di pignoramento e incasso).