Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
281.35 GEBVSCHKGOELPOTLEFGebV CH

Art. 19 Gebührenverordnung vom 23. September 1996 zum Bundesgesetz über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (GebV SchKG) - Einzahlung und Überweisung

GebV SchKG; 2. Kapitel: Gebühren des Betreibungsamtes
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (66 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 19 GebV SchKG · Einzahlung und Überweisung

Die Gebühr für die Entgegennahme einer Zahlung und deren Überweisung an einen Gläubiger bemisst sich nach der betreffenden Summe und beträgt:Summe/FrankenGebühr/Frankenbis10005.–über10005 Promille, jedoch höchstens 500.–

Einzahlungen des Amtes auf ein Depot und Abhebungen sind gebührenfrei (Art. 9 SchKG).

Auslagen für die Überweisung von Zahlungen an einen Gläubiger gehen zu seinen Lasten.

← Art. 18 GebV SchKG Gebührenverordnung vom 23. September 1996 zum Bundesgesetz über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (GebV SchKG) - Geltungsbereich Art. 20 GebV SchKG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (31)

PS150175 · zh (Art. 19 GebV SchKG)
Supervisory Appeal Limitation on Review of Enforcement Office Decisions
Cited in the reasoning to justify the deduction of an collection fee (Inkassogebühr) from the payment received by the creditor.
30.2015.15 · ti (art. 19 cpv. 1 OTLEF)
Partial Upholding of Appeal Regarding Refund of Mandatory Minimum Social Insurance Contributions and Fees for 2007 and 2009
This article regarding collection fees was used in the reasoning to determine the nature of the Fr. 23,65 expense for 2007.
30.2015.15 · ti (art. 19 cpv. 2 OTLEF)
Partial Upholding of Appeal Regarding Refund of Mandatory Minimum Social Insurance Contributions and Fees for 2007 and 2009
This article regarding payment forwarding costs was used in the reasoning to determine the nature of the Fr. 23,65 expense for 2007.
S 2014 166 · gr (Art. 19 OTLEF)
Pension Fund v. Employer: Overdue Occupational Pension Contributions and Procedural Costs
Mentioned in the reasoning to support the claim that collection fees are generally not recoverable, though this specific claim was ultimately dismissed in the dispositive by omission regarding inclusion in the main debt.
34.2012.10 · ti (art. 19 OTLEF)
Pension Fund v. Employer: Unpaid Contributions and Enforcement
This provision was mentioned to explain why the collection fee (tassa d’incasso) could not be recovered by the creditor in order 1 §.
15.2012.59 · ti (art. 19 OTLEF)
Creditor Challenge to Exclusion of Television from Seizure Based on Realization Costs
Cited in the preamble but not in the dispositive, relating to collection fee.
34.2009.30 · ti (art. 19 OTLEF)
Occupational Benefits Institution v. Former Employer: Pension Contribution Enforcement Dispute
Mentioned in the reasoning when rejecting the claim for collection fees, but this article is not explicitly cited in the operative orders (dispositive).
A/1923/2009 · ge (Art. 19 OELP)
Estate Claim Assignees v. Bankruptcy Office Regarding Distribution Deductions
Cited by analogy to determine the fee for collecting claims (encaissement de créances).
34.2008.40 · ti (art. 19 OTLEF)
Pension Contribution Dispute and Salary Basis Valuation
Cited in reasoning explaining why the collection fee (tassa d'incasso) cannot be charged to the creditor.
34.2008.40 · ti (art. 19 OTLEF)
Pension Contribution Dispute and Salary Basis Valuation
Cited in the reasoning section explaining why the collection fee (tassa d'incasso) cannot be charged to the creditor.
34.2008.10 · ti (art. 19 OTLEF)
Pension Fund Contribution Dispute After Contract Termination
Cited in the reasoning regarding the non-recoverability of collection fees (tassa d'incasso) by the creditor.
34.2008.17 · ti (art. 19 OTLEF)
Pension Fund vs. Employer: Unpaid Contributions and Fees Dispute
Referenced in the reasoning when denying the collection fee (tassa d'incasso) associated with the enforcement order.
34.2006.54 · ti (Art. 19 OTLEF)
Foundation v. Employer: Mandatory Contribution Collection Dispute
Cited to dismiss the claim for collection costs as they are not refundable in this context.
34.2006.17 · ti (art. 19 OTLEF)
Pension Fund v. Employer: Uncontested Contributions and Temerarious Conduct
Cited to deny the claim for collection fees.
34.2005.45 · ti (art. 19 OTLEF)
Pension Fund v. Employer: Dispute Over Professional Benefit Contributions
Cited in the reasoning to deny the claim for collection fees (tassa d’incasso), establishing why this specific fee is not recoverable.