281.32
KOVOAOFRUF
CH
CH
Art. 59 Verordnung vom 13. Juli 1911 über die Geschäftsführung der Konkursämter (KOV)
KOV; B. Verfahren in den einzelnen Stadien des Konkurses ; IV. Erwahrung der Konkursforderungen Kollokation der Gläubiger; 2. Kollokationsplan; d. Form der Kollokationsverfügungen
Art. 59 KOV
Erscheint eine Forderung als nicht hinreichend belegt, so kann die Verwaltung sie abweisen oder dem Ansprecher zur Einreichung weiterer Beweismittel eine Frist ansetzen.
Bedingte Zulassungen oder Abweisungen sind unstatthaft, ausser im Fall, wo die Tilgung einer im Bestand unbestrittenen Forderung angefochten wird, die bei Rückerstattung des Empfangenen wieder auflebt (Art. 291 Abs. 2 SchKG).
Kann die Konkursverwaltung sich über die Zulassung oder Abweisung einer Ansprache noch nicht aussprechen, so soll sie entweder mit der Aufstellung des Kollokationsplanes zuwarten oder aber den Kollokationsplan nachträglich ergänzen und unter öffentlicher Bekanntmachung wieder auflegen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (14)
A/1780/2021 · ge (art. 59 al. 3 OAOF)
Complainant v. Bankruptcy Office regarding Claim Admission Procedure
Cited in the previous binding decision to instruct the Office on how to handle the contested claims temporarily.
NE180005 · zh (Art. 59 Abs. 1 KOV)
Ancillary Bankruptcy Estate's Right to File Claim in Swiss Composition Proceedings
Mentioned in the reasoning, but not used in the final dispositive orders.
Plainte.2015.29 · vd (Art. 59 OAOF)
Appellant's Challenge to Final Bankruptcy Distribution Lacking Legal Interest
Cited in the introductory text and used by the lower authority (and discussed by the Cantonal Court) regarding the suspension or subsequent completion of the statement of claims when a decision on admission cannot be made.
PP140022 · zh (Art. 59 Abs. 1 KOV)
Claimant v. Company (Severance Pay Recognition and Costs)
Allows the creditors' office to set a deadline for submitting further evidence or dismiss the claim if the claim is not sufficiently substantiated.
A/1005/2014 · ge (art. 59 al. 3 OAOF)
Creditor v. Bankruptcy Office: Admission of Claim Despite Pending ECtHR Application
The court implicitly ruled against the application of this provision, as it concluded that the suspension based on it was wrongly applied.
A/549/2011 · ge (Art. 59 al. 3 OAOF)
Creditor Challenge to Conditional Admission of Claims in Statement of Liabilities
Cited in the final instruction to suspend the final decision regarding certain claims until judgment in application of this provision.
A/2793/2010 · ge (art. 59 OAOF)
Bankruptcy Office Document Access Refusal Upheld
This article was mentioned by the Office in connection with the consequences of not justifying a claim during the declaration of claims procedure, which was relevant to the complaint's context, though the final order did not hinge on its application.
A/309/2009 · ge (art. 59 al 3 OAOF)
Supervisory Commission Partially Admits Complaint Against Bankruptcy Office Pending Civil Suit Outcome
Cited in the reasoning regarding the possibility for the bankruptcy administration to suspend its decision on a claim.
15.2004.115 · ti (art. 59 RUF)
Creditors' Appeal Regarding Claim Rejection and Admission in Bankruptcy Ranking
The court found the rejection of the initial claim due to insufficient documentation was correct under this article, but found the subsequent admission of another claim required re-examination under this article.
15.2002.109 · ti (art. 59 RUF)
Creditor's Appeal of Claim Modification Refusal Under Procedural Review Standards
Cited in the reasoning section as part of the regulations governing the procedure for examining claims.
15.1998.169 · ti (art. 59 RUF)
Supervisory Authority v. Enforcement and Bankruptcy Officials Disciplinary Proceeding
Cited in the preamble to the orders, this article governs the production of supporting documents for bankruptcy claims.
OG 1994 52 · lu (Art. 59 Abs. 2 KOV)
Creditors' Attachment vs. Liquidator's Set-off in Composition Procedure
Applied to justify the liquidator's decision to suspend the final ruling on the admission of claims.
15.2002.109 · ti (art. 59 RUF)
Creditor's Appeal Against Bankruptcy Office Refusal to Modify Claim Schedule Post-Bankruptcy
Cited in the pronouncement section regarding the submission of documents related to claims.
15.2004.115 · ti (Art. 59 RUF)
Swiss Authority Bankruptcy Claim Review
The refusal to admit one claim was found to be correct and compliant with this article.