281.1
SCHKGLPLEF
CH
CH
Art. 94 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)
SchKG; Dritter Titel: Betreibung auf Pfändung ; I. Pfändung ; A. Vollzug; 6. Pfändung von Früchten vor der Ernte
Art. 94 SchKG
Hängende und stehende Früchte können nicht gepfändet werden: 1. auf den Wiesen vor dem 1. April; 2. auf den Feldern vor dem 1. Juni; 3. in den Rebgeländen vor dem 20. August.
Eine vor oder an den bezeichneten Tagen vorgenommene Veräusserung der Ernte ist dem pfändenden Gläubiger gegenüber ungültig.
Die Rechte der Grundpfandgläubiger auf die hängenden und stehenden Früchte als Bestandteile der Pfandsache bleiben vorbehalten, jedoch nur unter der Voraussetzung, dass der Grundpfandgläubiger selbst die Betreibung auf Verwertung des Grundpfandes eingeleitet hat, bevor die Verwertung der gepfändeten Früchte stattfindet.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (14)
SST.2022.302 · ag (Art. 94 SchKG)
Fraudulent Data Processing, Money Laundering, and Habitual Criminality Conviction Upheld, Sentence Modified
Used to determine that certain tied pension assets are unattachable.
A/3887/2019 · ge (art. 94 LP)
Spousal Wage Seizure Dispute and Property Restitution
Cited in the reasoning when questioning the appropriateness of seizing personal effects.
LY180013 · zh (Art. 94 SchKG)
Spousal Support Modification and Financial Disclosure in Divorce Appeals
Cited in relation to the debtor's obligation to disclose assets during enforcement proceedings.
GE.2014.0096 · vd (art. 94 al. 2 LP de A-VD)
Incidental Appeals on Definitive Closure Decisions Inadmissible Without Principal Appeals
Cited in the final paragraph regarding the deadline for filing an incidental appeal against this decision.
BB.2012.167 (art. 92-94 LEF)
Seizure of Funds Upheld Due to Insufficient Proof of Financial Hardship
Determines which assets are non-seizable or only partially seizable.
UH120318 · zh (Art. 92-94 SchKG)
Appellant v. Prosecutor: Appeal of Denial to Release Frozen Assets
Cited in the reasoning as the legal standard for assets exempt from seizure for cost coverage.
A/1931/2010 · ge (art. 94 al. 4 LP)
Claimant's Complaint Regarding Seizure Report Rejected Due to Enforcement Office's Lack of Jurisdiction Over Claim Quantification
Cited to define the obligation of third parties holding debtor's assets to provide information, which applies analogously to sequestration.
A/305/2008 · ge (art. 94 al. 4 LP)
Creditor v. Enforcement Office Regarding Salary Sequestration Denial
Cited as the basis for the obligation of third parties to provide information under threat of penalty.
RBOG.2001.Nr.8 · tg (Art. 94 Abs. 3 SchKG)
Mortgage Creditor Priority Over Maintenance Assignment in Rental Income Dispute
This provision is cited in the reasoning as an analogous principle supporting the right of the real estate pledgee to natural fruits, relevant to the dispute over rental incomes.
LY180013 · zh (Art. 94 SchKG)
Divorce Appeal: Spousal Maintenance, Disclosure of Business Income, and Legal Costs Contribution
Referenced within the reasoning to support the findings regarding the defendant's lack of usable assets, although not explicitly in the final orders, it relates to the grounds for costs/contribution in point 2.
RBOG.2001.Nr.08 · tg (Art. 94 Abs. 1 SchKG)
Mortgage Pledge Priority Over Alimony Rent Assignment
Cited by the lower court in its decision (which the Supreme Court upheld) to instruct the enforcement office to proceed correctly regarding the seizure of rents.
RBOG.2001.Nr.08 · tg (Art. 94 Abs. 3 SchKG)
Mortgage Pledge Priority Over Alimony Rent Assignment
Cited in the reasoning to support the principle that the mortgage creditor is entitled to natural fruits.
RBOG.2001.Nr.8 · tg (Art. 94 Abs. 1 SchKG)
Foreclosure Lien Priority Over Post-Lien Alimony Assignment on Rental Income
The court upheld the lower court's instruction to the Debt Enforcement Office to proceed according to this article, which relates to the enforcement measures concerning secured claims.
UH120318 · zh (Art. 92-94 SchKG)
Appeal Against Seizure Release Denial in Foreign Asset Freeze Case
Cited in the reasoning as the legal basis for assets exempt from seizure, referenced under Art. 268 Abs. 3 StPO.