281.1
SCHKGLPLEF
CH
CH
Art. 89 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)
SchKG; Dritter Titel: Betreibung auf Pfändung ; I. Pfändung ; A. Vollzug; 1. Zeitpunkt
Art. 89 SchKG
Unterliegt der Schuldner der Betreibung auf Pfändung, so hat das Betreibungsamt nach Empfang des Fortsetzungsbegehrens unverzüglich die Pfändung zu vollziehen oder durch das Betreibungsamt des Ortes, wo die zu pfändenden Vermögensstücke liegen, vollziehen zu lassen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (274)
BGE 85 III 68 (Art. 89 SchKG)
Conditional withdrawal of a seizure request in debt collection: withdrawal conditioned on debtor's partial payment treated as unconditional; collection requests and their withdrawal are incompatible with conditions.
Sets a fixed deadline for executing seizure requests, making conditional requests incompatible with the law.
A/242/2025 · ge (art. 89 LP)
Cantonal Tax Administration v. Office of Enforcement (Double Seizure Election)
Cited in the reasoning as the procedural provision regarding the duty of the Office to address the notice of seizure without delay.
A/250/2025 · ge (art. 89 LP)
Tax Authority v. Enforcement Office on Double Enforcement Proceedings
The Office is instructed to proceed, which includes determining the mode of continuation of the proceedings and addressing notices to the debtor as per this article.
A/1486/2025 · ge (art. 89 LP)
Debtor's Challenge to Pension Garnishment Rejected Despite Subsequent Recalculation
The court cited this article to affirm the Office's duty to proceed with the seizure without delay, justifying the rejection of the suspension request.
SBK 2025 52 · gr (Art. 89 SchKG)
Seizure Notice Upheld Despite Appeal of Underlying Decision
Although cited in the reasoning regarding the immediate execution of the seizure, it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.
A/1759/2025 · ge (Art. 89 LP)
Taxpayer Challenge to Debt Enforcement Following Provisional VAT Assessment and Lifted Opposition
Cited as the justification for the enforcement office to issue the seizure notice after the opposition was validly lifted.
SCBES.2025.37 · so (Art. 89 SchKG)
Debtor's Challenges to Debt Enforcement Proceedings Upheld by Supervisory Authority
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the duty of the enforcement office to proceed with attachment, but not explicitly in the dispositive (Order 1).
105 2024 38 · fr (art. 89 LP)
Claimant Fails to Overcome Valid Service in Seizure Challenge
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the validity of the seizure notice, which is confirmed in the dispositive.
BA 2023 80 · zg (Art. 89 SchKG)
Asset Seizure Challenge Upheld; Competence Goods Exemption Denied to Legal Entity
Cited in the reasoning regarding federal execution (though not explicitly in the dispositive, but based on the strict rule, it is excluded unless cited in the dispositive orders 1-4).
PS230066 · zh (Art. 89 SchKG)
Appeal Regarding Scope of Asset Arrest Order for Foreign Judgment Enforcement
Applied analogously (sinngemässer Anwendung) to determine the procedure for coordinating execution across different collection districts using a lead collection office.
15.2023.26 · ti (art. 89 LEF)
Debtor Appeals Wage Garnishment Order Following Failure to Appear
Cited in the reasoning concerning the obligation to execute the garnishment without delay, justifying the rejection of the request for postponement.
A/3217/2022 · ge (art. 89 LP)
Admissibility of Seizure Challenge Based on Legal Aid Reimbursement Claim
Cited in the reasoning to explain the general obligation of the office to proceed with the seizure without delay upon receipt of the request to continue the enforcement.
A/3599/2022 · ge (art. 89 LP)
Debtor Challenge to Salary Seizure Calculation Upheld Due to Lack of Financial Disclosure
Cited as the legal basis for the Office's duty to proceed with the seizure.
KSK 2023 14 · gr (Art. 89 SchKG)
Debtor's Appeal Against Seizure and Subsistence Minimum Calculation Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the 'Holprinzip' (duty to collect information) for seizures on-site.
A/3307/2022 · ge (art. 89 LP)
Creditor Enforcement and Territorial Competence Over Assets in Another Canton
Mentioned extensively in the reasoning (consid. 3.1) as the provision whose analogous application in seizure execution was central to the dispute, leading to the order to execute the seizure.