281.1
SCHKGLPLEF
CH
CH
Art. 77 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)
SchKG; Zweiter Titel: Schuldbetreibung; VIII. Zahlungsbefehl und Rechtsvorschlag; C. Rechtsvorschlag; 4. Nachträglicher Rechtsvorschlag bei Gläubigerwechsel
Art. 77 SchKG
Wechselt während des Betreibungsverfahrens der Gläubiger, so kann der Betriebene einen Rechtsvorschlag noch nachträglich bis zur Verteilung oder Konkurseröffnung anbringen.
Der Betriebene muss den Rechtsvorschlag innert zehn Tagen, nachdem er vom Gläubigerwechsel Kenntnis erhalten hat, beim Richter des Betreibungsortes schriftlich und begründet anbringen und die Einreden gegen den neuen Gläubiger glaubhaft machen.
Der Richter kann bei Empfang des Rechtsvorschlags die vorläufige Einstellung der Betreibung verfügen; er entscheidet über die Zulassung des Rechtsvorschlages nach Einvernahme der Parteien.
Wird der nachträgliche Rechtsvorschlag bewilligt, ist aber bereits eine Pfändung vollzogen worden, so setzt das Betreibungsamt dem Gläubiger eine Frist von zehn Tagen an, innert der er auf Anerkennung seiner Forderung klagen kann. Nutzt er die Frist nicht, so fällt die Pfändung dahin.
Das Betreibungsamt zeigt dem Schuldner jeden Gläubigerwechsel an.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (41)
AbR.1982.83.Nr.23 · ow (Art. 77 SchKG)
Late Objection Permitted on Appeal for Foreign Debtor
Referred to as the correct procedure for applying for a late objection if the delay was due to non-receipt of the payment order, a matter not within the competence of the Obergerichtskommission.
ZK 2009 441 · be (Art. 77 SchKG)
Cessionary of Child Support Claim Granted Definitive Relief Despite Undecided Validity of Cession
Cited implicitly in the reasoning regarding the ability of the debtor to raise objections against the assignee subsequently, which is relevant to the final determination on granting definitive legal dispensation.
14.2024.128 · ti (art. 77 cpv. 1 LEF)
Subrogation of Joint Debtor Upon Full Payment and Right of Recourse
Cited in the reasoning that supports the final decision regarding the substitution of the creditor in the execution proceedings.
A/671/2021 · ge (art. 77 LP)
Enforcement Office Substitution Upheld Despite Debtor's Challenge to Assignment Validity
The court dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to demonstrate a concrete objective in enforcement proceedings, noting that the provision's ten-day deadline was not triggered due to the lack of an ongoing enforcement action.
ML.2021.35 · vd (Art. 77 al. 2 LP)
Debtor's Knowledge of Debt Assignment Triggers Opposition Deadline
The appeal was rejected because the late opposition was not filed within the ten-day deadline prescribed by this article.
C/7215/2019 · ge (art. 77 LP)
Admissibility of Late Opposition to Debt Enforcement Following Creditor Change
The appeal was rejected because the court upheld the lower court's finding that the debtor had no legal interest in renewing an opposition already filed for the same collection proceedings, making the late opposition inadmissible.
A/4471/2017 · ge (Art. 77 LP)
Debtor Complaint Against Enforcement Proceedings Rejection Based on Statutory Lapse and Successor Creditor Standing
Cited in the reasoning concerning the debtor's claim regarding the lack of formal notification of the change of creditor, which was central to one of the arguments rejected by the final order.
PS170161 · zh (Art. 77 SchKG)
Objection to Debt Enforcement After Creditor Change: Admissibility of Set-Off and Assignment Validity
The court's decision to dismiss the appeal is based on the legal framework governing the subsequent objection in debt enforcement proceedings due to a change of creditor.
C/7178/2016 · ge (Art. 77 LP)
Creditor Transfer Enforcement Opposition Timeliness and Substance Appeal
The decision addresses the admissibility and merits of the appeal against the rejection of a late opposition based on the change of creditor provision.
PS150153 · zh (Art. 77 SchKG)
Father's Late Objection to Debt Enforcement After Child's Withdrawal on Grounds of Creditor Change
The decision hinges on the application of Art. 77 SchKG regarding the possibility of filing a subsequent objection after a change of creditor, which dictates the main outcome of the appeal regarding the objection procedure.
Plainte.2014.31 · vd (Art. 77 LP)
Debtor's Improper Procedural Challenge to Change of Creditor in Enforcement Action
This provision, governing opposition to a change of creditor during execution proceedings, was central to the court's reasoning that the appellant should have used judicial remedies instead of a supervisory complaint.
ML.2012.224 · vd (Art. 77 al. 1 et 2 LP)
Appeal of Cost Award in Debt Enforcement Opposition Dismissal
Cited to explain the nature of the initial opposition procedure regarding debt enforcement.
Faillite.2011.40 · vd (Art. 77 LP)
Bankruptcy Order Annulled Due to Lack of Standing in Successor Creditor
Cited in the reasoning section when examining the possibility of a creditor substitution during enforcement proceedings.
ML.2010.152 · vd (Art. 77 LP)
Foreclosure Assignment Validity Appeal
The court rejected the appeal, confirming the lower court's decision which addressed the debtor's late opposition following a change of creditor, as governed by this article.
A/813/2010 · ge (art. 77 LP)
Creditor's Second Enforcement Action for Same Debt Upheld Over Abuse of Process Claim
Cited regarding the proper jurisdiction (the ordinary judge) to rule on alleged defects in the transfer of claim following a late objection.