Art. 60 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)

ZZ.1991.19 · so (Art. 60 SchKG)

Imprisoned Debtor's Appeal Against Payment Orders Served Without Appointment Deadline

The supervisory authority upheld the debtor's appeal based on the mandatory requirement of Art. 60 SchKG to set a deadline for appointing a representative for an incarcerated debtor.

KV.2023.5 · sg (Art. 60 SchKG)

Health Insurer v. Incarcerated Debtor: Debt Collection Authorization Upheld

Cited in the reasoning section (Erwägung 3.2) regarding the right to a stay of proceedings for an incarcerated debtor, but the court concludes this provision did not prevent the debt enforcement, thus it is not the basis for the final orders.

Z2 2023 52 · zg (Art. 60 SchKG)

Corporate Liquidation Appeal Dismissed for Untimeliness

Cited extensively in the reasoning (E. 8.2, E. 9) to explain why a stay of proceedings was deemed inapplicable in this context.

Z2 2023 52 · zg (Art. 60 SchKG)

Corporate Liquidation Appeal Dismissed for Untimeliness

The reasoning in E. 8.2 mentions that the representative asked the single judge to set a deadline for H. pursuant to Art. 60 SchKG, but this provision was ultimately ruled inapplicable in E. 9 regarding the stay of proceedings.

A/3868/2022 · ge (l'art. 60 LP)

Creditor v. Debt Enforcement Office: Service of Process on Foreign Representative

The court orders the enforcement office to proceed with notifications based on the declaration made under this article, which the debtor signed.

PS230023 · zh (Art. 60 SchKG)

Debtor Detention and Bankruptcy Notification Requirements

The main ground for upholding the appeal was the failure to apply Art. 60 SchKG, requiring the lower court to annul the bankruptcy decision.

KSK 2022 6 · gr (Art. 60 SchKG)

Incarcerated Debtor Representation in Debt Collection Proceedings

The court confirmed that the lower authority correctly applied this article by setting a deadline for the debtor to appoint a representative due to his imprisonment.

KSK 2022 6 · gr (Art. 60 SchKG)

Incarcerated Debtor Representative Designation Appeal

The court found that the enforcement office correctly applied this article by setting a deadline for the debtor to appoint a representative while in custody.

A/2127/2021 · ge (art. 60 LP)

Creditor v. Debtor: Timeliness of Opposition Following Defective Service on Incarcerated Debtor

Cited extensively in the reasoning to determine the irregularity of the initial notification, which justifies admitting the complaint in part and concluding the nullity of the second notice.

KSK 2021 25 · gr (Art. 60 SchKG)

Incarcerated Debtor vs. Enforcement Office: Appointment of Representative for Seizure Proceedings

The core of the dispute concerned the correct application of this article regarding debtors under arrest and the requirement to appoint a representative.

A/3294/2018 · ge (art. 60 al. 1 let. a et b, 62 al. 1 let. a, 89A et 89B LPA ; art. 59, 60 al. 1 et 61 let. a LP LPGA)

Supplementary Benefit Reimbursement Upheld Due to Undisclosed Foreign Assets

Cited in order 2 to confirm that the appeal met the formal conditions for admissibility.

ABS 2019 171 · be (Art. 60 SchKG)

Debtor Failure to Appoint Representative After Refusal Does Not Extend Enforcement Deadline

The court applied this article in its reasoning to determine that the appeal should be dismissed because the direct service of the payment order to the debtor was lawful after the deadline granted for appointing a representative expired.

RT150068 · zh (Art. 60 SchKG)

Appeal Against Debt Enforcement Denied Due to Lack of Merit and New Arguments

The court discussed the effect of legal suspension (Rechtsstillstand) for detained debtors.

copy.of.2008.54 · bl (Art. 60 SchKG)

Debtor's Representation Rights During Imprisonment Do Not Invalidate Debt Enforcement Proceedings

Cited to state that the violation of this article does not necessarily make the collection actions void and that the purpose of the provision is to protect the debtor, not the public order.

200.08.570 · bl (Art. 60 SchKG)

Debtor Custody: Procedural Error Not Automatically Voiding Enforcement Actions

This provision is cited as the basis for the appeal, concerning the requirement to grant a debtor imprisoned time to appoint a representative. The court's decision addresses whether its violation renders prior enforcement actions void.