281.1
SCHKGLPLEF
CH
CH
Art. 6 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)
SchKG; Erster Titel: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; I. Organisation; D. Haftung; 2. Verjährung
Art. 6 SchKG
Der Anspruch auf Schadenersatz verjährt mit Ablauf von drei Jahren von dem Tage an gerechnet, an welchem der Geschädigte von der Schädigung Kenntnis erlangt hat, jedenfalls aber mit Ablauf von zehn Jahren, vom Tage an gerechnet, an welchem das schädigende Verhalten erfolgte oder aufhörte.
Hat die Person, die den Schaden verursacht hat, durch ihr Verhalten eine strafbare Handlung begangen, so verjährt der Anspruch auf Schadenersatz frühestens mit Eintritt der strafrechtlichen Verfolgungsverjährung. Tritt diese infolge eines erstinstanzlichen Strafurteils nicht mehr ein, so verjährt der Anspruch frühestens mit Ablauf von drei Jahren seit Eröffnung des Urteils.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (13)
A/4487/2018 · ge (art. 6 al. 1 de la loi d'application de la LP du 29 janvier 2010 - LaLP - E 3 60))
Taxpayers Appeal Rejection of Tax Element Allocation and Enforcement Suspension
Cited in the reasoning section (Considerant 3) to identify the supervisory authority in Geneva, but not explicitly in the dispositive.
KSK 2018 50 · gr (Art. 6 cpv. 1 LEF)
Appeal Dismissed for Time-Barred Execution Challenge and Destroyed Records
Basis for concluding that the claim related to the execution of the pledges was subject to absolute prescription (statute of limitations).
HC.2017.1145 · vd (Art. 6 al. 1 LP)
Appellant v. State: Prescription Period for Damages Against Public Official
This provision establishes the prescriptive period for the claim for damages, which was the primary basis for rejecting the appeal (as the claim was deemed prescribed).
C/27986/2012 · ge (art. 6 al. 1 LP)
State v. Creditors Regarding Bankruptcy Office Malfeasance
Cited in the reasoning section to discuss the one-year relative limitation period for the liability claim, which was determined not to have elapsed.
CDP.2012.381 · ne (Art. 6 al. 1 LP)
Bankruptcy Annulment and Liability for Restaurant Closure Damages
Cited as the relevant prescriptive period for the damages action, which the court finds was respected.
AA040054 · zh (Art. 6 Abs. 1 SchKG)
Appellant v. Cantonal Organs Regarding Security Deposit and Legal Aid Denial
Discussed extensively in relation to the appellant's substantive claims (statute of limitations), which contributed to the assessment of the appeal's hopelessness.
12.2002.84 · ti (Art. 6 LEF)
Claim for Damages Against Canton Due to Administrator's Erroneous Property Encumbrance Listing Leading to Auction Nullification
Cited in the analysis regarding the prescription period, although the procedural notification under Art. 20 LFResp (analogous to Art. 5 LEF liability context) was found to be timely.
12.2001.51 · ti (art. 6 cpv. 1 LEF)
Bankruptcy Commissioner Negligence Suit Barred by Prescription
This provision establishes the one-year prescription period from the date of knowledge of the damage, which was the basis for rejecting the appeal against the finding of prescription.
TA.1999.203 · ne (art. 6 LP)
Creditor's Claim Against State for Vandalism Damages Barred by Untimely Filing
While the court found the action prescribed based on this article in the reasoning, it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (which only declare inadmissibility and rule on costs).
12.2001.51 · ti (art. 6 cpv. 1 LEF)
Company v. Public Entity (Prescription of Claim Against Composition Commissioner)
This article established the one-year statute of limitations period that the Court used to reject the appeal.
12.2002.84 · ti (art. 6 LEF)
State Liability for Bankruptcy Administrator's Error in Encumbrance List and Statute of Limitations
This provision concerning the statute of limitations was applied to confirm that the lawsuit was timely, as the notification of damage was sent within the one-year period.
AA040054 · zh (Art. 6 Abs. 1 SchKG)
Claimant v. Canton Regarding Damages for Alleged Official Misconduct in Bankruptcy Proceedings
The Court implicitly reviewed the application of this provision concerning the statute of limitations when determining the lack of prospects of success for the appeal.
PS200234 · zh (Art. 6 Abs. 3 und 4 SchKG)
Debtor Reverses Bankruptcy Order by Depositing Contested Debt and Demonstrating Solvency
This reference appears to be a typo in the original text (it references Art. 67 Abs. 3 und 4 SchKG). Assuming the intent was to reference the cited article in the reasoning regarding the examination of claims.