281.1
SCHKGLPLEF
CH
CH
Art. 34 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)
SchKG; Erster Titel: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; II. Verschiedene Vorschriften; B. Zustellung; 1. Schriftlich und elektronisch
Art. 34 SchKG
Die Zustellung von Mitteilungen, Verfügungen und Entscheiden der Betreibungs- und Konkursämter sowie der Aufsichtsbehörden erfolgen durch eingeschriebene Postsendung oder auf andere Weise gegen Empfangsbestätigung, sofern dieses Gesetz nichts anderes bestimmt.
Mit dem Einverständnis der betroffenen Person können Mitteilungen, Verfügungen und Entscheide elektronisch zugestellt werden. Sie sind mit einer elektronischen Signatur gemäss Bundesgesetz vom 18. März 2016 über die elektronische Signatur zu versehen. Der Bundesrat regelt: a. die zu verwendende Signatur; b. das Format der Mitteilungen, Verfügungen und Entscheide sowie ihrer Beilagen; c. die Art und Weise der Übermittlung; d. den Zeitpunkt, zu dem die Mitteilung, die Verfügung oder der Entscheid als zugestellt gilt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (83)
BGE 150 III 223 (Art. 34 SchKG)
Debt collection fee schedule for payment orders, attachment notices, loss certificates, and travel expenses: statutory basis required for charges on voluntary actions like A-Post delivery and collection invitations.
Basis for holding that delivery of attachment notices and loss certificates must be by registered mail or with proof of receipt, so A-Post delivery and its fees were not permitted.
KBE.2024.40 · ag (Art. 34 Abs. 1 SchKG)
Debtor's Appeal Allowed Due to Improper Service of Seizure Order
It was used to determine that the delivery of the seizure order via A-Post Plus did not meet the formal requirements for proper notification, thus affecting the start of the appeal period.
PS240224 · zh (Art. 34 f. SchKG)
Appellant v. Enforcement Office (Asset Declaration Summons Appeal)
Cited in the reasoning section as the relevant law concerning the timeliness and correctness of the summonses, which is the substantive issue leading to the annulment and remittal in order 1.
PS240191 · zh (Art. 34 f. SchKG)
Annulment of Seizure Notices for Improper Service
Cited as the legal basis for the delivery of seizure announcements, establishing the burden of proof for delivery on the enforcement office.
PS230180 · zh (Art. 34 Abs. 2 SchKG)
Enforcement Office Costs for Redundant Physical Notification and Fee Exemption for Cost Notice
Cited in the reasoning to discuss the validity of electronic vs. postal service, but ultimately not directly cited in the final operative order (Order 1) as the main ground for dismissal.
420.22.246 · bl (Art. 34 SchKG)
Creditor's Appeal on Debtor's Minimum Living Expenses Denied in Part
Governs the delivery of documents by debt enforcement and bankruptcy offices, stating that electronic delivery is optional and requires consent.
ABS 2022 200 · be (Art. 34 Abs. 2 SchKG)
Creditor's Right to Electronic Service in Debt Enforcement Cost Advance Refusal
This provision is cited in the reasoning (E. 8.2, E. 8.3) to establish that there is no entitlement to electronic delivery, which forms the basis for dismissing the appeal against the operational decision.
105 2022 102 · fr (art. 34 LP)
Bankruptcy Notification Validity and Service Requirements Appeal
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the proper communication rules that were not followed, justifying the annulment.
PS220084 · zh (Art. 34 Abs. 1 SchKG)
Appeal Challenging Seizure Dismissal Due to Alleged Judicial Bias and Service Method Compliance
Cited in the reasoning regarding the mandatory method of service by debt enforcement and bankruptcy offices.
PS220084 · zh (Art. 34 Abs. 2 SchKG)
Appeal Challenging Seizure Dismissal Due to Alleged Judicial Bias and Service Method Compliance
Cited in the reasoning regarding electronic service with consent.
ML.2021.99 · vd (Art. 34 LP)
Debtor's Untimely Request for Restoration of Appeal Deadline in Debt Collection Proceedings
This provision, although mentioned in the reasoning as governing the procedure, was not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders, hence it is excluded based on the rules.
Plainte.2020.23 · vd (Art. 34 al. 1 LP)
Attorney Appeal of Default Certificates and Bailiff Recusal Dismissed
This article was cited in the reasoning concerning the tardiness of the complaint, although the final decision confirmed the lower court's decision which found the complaint inadmissible.
Plainte.2020.13 · vd (Art. 34 al. 1 LP)
Debtor Appeal of Salary Attachment Calculation Upheld
Cited in the header, related to the means of notification, but not cited in the dispositive orders (I, II, III).
Plainte.2020.8 · vd (Art. 34 al. 1 LP)
Bankruptcy Auction Appeal Timeliness and Reinstatement Denial
Cited as the procedural rule governing how supervisory authority decisions are notified in writing.
Plainte.2019.59 · vd (Art. 34 al. 1 LP)
Appeal Regarding Inadmissible Complaint Due to Failure to Specify Challenged Decisions
This article regarding the manner of notification was discussed in the context of the appellant's argument, although its violation was ultimately deemed not to invalidate the communication.