281.1
SCHKGLPLEF
CH
CH
Art. 306 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)
SchKG; Elfter Titel: Nachlassverfahren; II. Allgemeine Bestimmungen über den Nachlassvertrag; B. Bestätigungsentscheid; 1. Voraussetzungen
Art. 306 SchKG
Die Bestätigung des Nachlassvertrages wird an folgende Voraussetzungen geknüpft: 1. Der Wert der angebotenen Leistungen muss im richtigen Verhältnis zu den Möglichkeiten des Schuldners stehen; bei deren Beurteilung kann das Nachlassgericht auch Anwartschaften des Schuldners berücksichtigen. 2. Die vollständige Befriedigung der angemeldeten privilegierten Gläubiger sowie die Erfüllung der während der Stundung mit Zustimmung des Sachwalters eingegangenen Verbindlichkeiten müssen hinlänglich sichergestellt sein, soweit nicht einzelne Gläubiger ausdrücklich auf die Sicherstellung ihrer Forderung verzichten; Artikel 305 Absatz 3 gilt sinngemäss. 3. Bei einem ordentlichen Nachlassvertrag (Art. 314 Abs. 1) müssen die Anteilsinhaber einen angemessenen Sanierungsbeitrag leisten.
Das Nachlassgericht kann eine ungenügende Regelung auf Antrag oder von Amtes wegen ergänzen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (35)
AbR.1984.85.Nr.34 · ow (Art. 306 Abs. 2 Ziff. 2 SchKG)
Composition Agreement Validity Upheld Due to Creditor Satisfaction Prospects
It is the legal basis for the requirement that the execution of the composition agreement and the full satisfaction of privileged creditors must be sufficiently secured.
14.2008.116 · ti (Art. 306 cpv. 2 LEF)
Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Proceedings (Italy)
Cited in the dispositive order 2, concerning the request by privileged creditors to ensure their claims are adequately guaranteed.
14.2000.124 · ti (art. 306 cpv. 2 n. 1bis LEF)
Composition Approval Denial Upheld Due to Revocation of Creditor Acceptance and Failure to Meet Liquidation Threshold
The homologation was refused, in part, due to the lack of the objective prerequisite that the proceeds of realization appear superior to the price obtainable through bankruptcy liquidation, as required by this article.
14.1995.209 · ti (art. 306 cpv.2 n.2 LEF)
Appeal Against Second Moratorium for Composition with Abandonment of Assets Granted Despite Prior Failed Composition
Cited in the reasoning for the previous non-homologation, leading to the current appeal, but not explicitly used in the final orders (orders 1-4).
Faillite.2018.16 · vd (Art. 306 al. 1 ch. 1 LP)
Appeal Regarding Ratification of Asset Sale and Dividend Composition in Debt Protection Proceedings
Cited as a condition for homologation concerning the proportionality of the offered benefits to the debtor's resources.
Faillite.2018.16 · vd (Art. 306 al. 1 ch. 3 LP)
Appeal Regarding Ratification of Asset Sale and Dividend Composition in Debt Protection Proceedings
Cited as a condition for homologation concerning the equitable contribution required from shareholders in an ordinary concordat.
Faillite.2016.26 · vd (Art. 306 al. 2 ch. 2 LP)
Dividend Composition Homologation Refusal and Bankruptcy Confirmation
This provision, concerning the conditions for approving a concordat (sufficient guarantee for privileged creditors), was the core legal issue examined regarding the appeal against the lower court's refusal to homologate the concordat.
Faillite.2015.8 · vd (Art. 306 al. 1 ch. 2 LP)
Real Estate Company Provisional Stay Revocation Appeal
This provision concerns the conditions for the approval of a composition (homologation du concordat), which was considered lacking, leading to the revocation of the provisional stay.
A/3493/2012 · ge (art. 306 LP)
Taxpayer Appeal on Timing of Income Recognition from Debt Waiver in Creditors' Arrangement
Cited in the reasoning section as the applicable conditions for the homologation of the concordat, which is the central basis for the tax realization.
Faillite.2015.2 · vd (Art. 306 al. 2 ch. 2 LP)
Company Appeal Regarding Dividend Moratorium Refusal and Subsequent Bankruptcy Declaration
Cited in the heading, relating to the requirement for security for the execution of the composition, which was the main ground for refusing homologation.
Faillite.2012.51 · vd (Art. 306 al. 2 ch. 1bis LP)
Company Appeal of Provisional Arrangement Rejection Affirmed Due to Insufficient Evidence of Proposed Recovery Plan
This provision was used to confirm that the proposed composition by abandonment of assets did not show a superior interest for the creditors compared to bankruptcy.
14.2009.54 · ti (art. 306 LEF)
Appeal Regarding Rejection of Ordinary Composition Due to Insufficient Security
Cited in the preamble as part of the legal basis for the decision to reject the appeal (regarding guarantees).
14.2009.29 · ti (art. 306 cpv. 2 LEF)
Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Proceedings and Appointment of Commissioners
Article cited concerning the procedure for privileged creditors to request adequate guarantees (Order 2).
SK 07 118 2 · lu (Art. 306 Abs. 2 Ziff. 1 SchKG)
Composition Agreement Approval Upheld Against Creditor Appeal
Implicitly used as the standard against which the approved composition agreement was measured (i.e., it was not deemed manifestly unreasonable).
SKG 2003 25 · gr (Art. 306 Abs. 2 Ziff. 2 SchKG)
Settlement Court Jurisdiction Over Claim Classification in Debt Restructuring
This provision concerning security/collateral for privileged claims was repeatedly referenced in the reasoning regarding the transfer of security into a deposit (Hinterlegung) following the setting of the legal action period.