281.1 SCHKGLPLEF

CH

Art. 305 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)

SchKG; Elfter Titel: Nachlassverfahren; II. Allgemeine Bestimmungen über den Nachlassvertrag; A. Annahme durch die Gläubiger

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (404 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 305 SchKG

Der Nachlassvertrag ist angenommen, wenn ihm bis zum Bestätigungsentscheid zugestimmt hat: a. die Mehrheit der Gläubiger, die zugleich mindestens zwei Drittel des Gesamtbetrages der Forderungen vertreten; oder b. ein Viertel der Gläubiger, die mindestens drei Viertel des Gesamtbetrages der Forderungen vertreten.

Die privilegierten Gläubiger, der Ehegatte, die eingetragene Partnerin oder der eingetragene Partner des Schuldners werden weder für ihre Person noch für ihre Forderung mitgerechnet. Pfandgesicherte Forderungen zählen nur zu dem Betrag mit, der nach der Schätzung des Sachwalters ungedeckt ist.

Das Nachlassgericht entscheidet, ob und zu welchem Betrage bedingte Forderungen und solche mit ungewisser Verfallzeit sowie bestrittene Forderungen mitzuzählen sind. Dem gerichtlichen Entscheide über den Rechtsbestand der Forderungen wird dadurch nicht vorgegriffen.

← Art. 304 SchKG Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG) Art. 306 SchKG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (13)

14.2000.124 · ti (art. 305 cpv. 1 LEF)

Composition Approval Denial Upheld Due to Revocation of Creditor Acceptance and Failure to Meet Liquidation Threshold

The appeal was rejected because the required double majority for homologation under this article was not achieved.

C/20395/2021 · ge (art. 305 LP)

Appeal Against Bankruptcy Order Following Denial of Stay Extension

Cited to indicate that the homologation of a concordat requires the acceptance of a qualified majority of creditors.

CPF 2014 27 · ju (Art. 305 al. 1 LP)

Creditor's Claim Inclusion in Football Club Composition Agreement

Cited as the legal basis for determining the required majority of claims for the homologation of the concordat.

CPF 2014 27 · ju (Art. 305 al. 3 LP)

Creditor's Claim Inclusion in Football Club Composition Agreement

Cited for the judge's discretion in deciding whether and to what extent contested claims should be counted.

Faillite.2011.74 · vd (Art. 305 LP)

Cantonal Court Ruling on Dividend Concordat Vote Inclusion of Subordinated Claims

This article defines the conditions for the acceptance of a composition agreement, which the court used to review the lower court's decision regarding homologation.

14.2009.54 · ti (art. 305 LEF)

Appeal Regarding Rejection of Ordinary Composition Due to Insufficient Security

Cited in the preamble as part of the legal basis for the decision to reject the appeal (implied through the discussion on majorities).

ML.2009.104 · vd (art. 305 al. 2 LP)

Cantonal Court Decision on Realization of Pledged Asset Following Concordat

Cited in the reasoning regarding the estimation of the pledge for calculating majorities during composition homologation.

14.2003.3 · ti (Art. 305 LEF)

Appeal Against Homologation of Concordat with Asset Abandonment Upheld

Cited in the final order (Order 1) to establish the material grounds for rejecting the appeal.

SK 02 91 · lu (Art. 305 SchKG)

Sports Club Composition Approval Upheld Against Creditor Claims of Employment Contract Transfer

Cited in Order 4 for setting a time limit to sue for creditors with contested claims.

OG ARGVP 1999 3346 · ar (Art. 305 SchKG)

Debtor's Bankruptcy Upheld Despite Futile Debt Restructuring Attempt

Mentioned in the reasoning to explain the quorum required for creditors to approve a composition agreement within bankruptcy proceedings.

RBOG.1998.Nr.15 · tg (Art. 305 Abs. 1 SchKG)

Debt Settlement Moratorium Continuation Procedure

Cited in discussion regarding the continuation of proceedings against the will of creditors.

14.2000.124 · ti (Art. 305 cpv. 1 LEF)

Creditor Withdrawal Justifies Rejection of Composition Agreement

The court's final decision confirms the lower court's decision not to ratify the arrangement because the required majorities under Art. 305 para. 1 LEF were not met (due to withdrawal of adhesion).

14.2003.3 · ti (art. 305 LEF)

Creditor Appeal Regarding Composition Agreement Approval Upheld

Cited in the final orders as a relevant article for the rejection of the appeal based on the fulfillment of the required majority for acceptance of the concordat.