281.1
SCHKGLPLEF
CH
Art. 292 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)
SchKG; Zehnter Titel: Anfechtung ; E. Verjährung
Art. 292 SchKG
Das Anfechtungsrecht verjährt: 1. nach Ablauf von drei Jahren seit Zustellung des Pfändungsverlustscheins (Art. 285 Abs. 2 Ziff. 1); 2. nach Ablauf von drei Jahren seit der Konkurseröffnung (Art. 285 Abs. 2 Ziff. 2); 3. nach Ablauf von drei Jahren seit Bestätigung des Nachlassvertrages mit Vermögensabtretung.
Bei der Anerkennung eines ausländischen Konkursdekretes wird die Zeit zwischen dem Anerkennungsantrag und der Publikation nach Artikel 169 IPRG nicht mitberechnet.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (13)
2021.10.27.vv.5 · bl (Art. 292 SchKG)
State Liability for Negligent Bankruptcy Administration and Avoidance Claims
This provision sets the time limit for challenging actions (anfechtungsrecht) and is relevant to the discussion of the bankruptcy administration's failure to interrupt the statute of limitations.
420.18.218 · bl (Art. 292 Ziff. 2 SchKG)
Creditor's Right to Pursue Auditor Claims Upheld, Pre-Bankruptcy Actions Dismissed
This provision was used to dismiss the appeal regarding certain claims due to their statute of limitations.
15.2014.130 · ti (art. 292 n. 2 LEF)
Bankruptcy Estate Recovery of Real Estate Proceeds from Clawback Action
Cited in the reasoning section (Considerato 6.1) in relation to the prescription for a new revocation action regarding income prior to co-administration.
C/11495/2009 · ge (art. 292 ch. 1 LP)
Creditor's Revocation of Undervalued Property Transfer to Spouse
The court considered that the right to bring the revocation action had not prescribed, as the prescriptive period starts upon notification of the deed of seizure.
HG100052 · zh (Art. 292 SchKG)
Company in Liquidation v. Former Board Member Regarding Delayed Bankruptcy Filing
This article on the lapse of the right to claim avoidance (Verwirkungsfrist) was used to dismiss the plaintiff's arguments regarding the successful challenge of the capital increase compensation.
A/2280/2012 · ge (Art. 292 ch. 2 LP)
Bankruptcy Office Revocatory Actions Standing Dispute
Cited in the reasoning regarding the time limit for the revocation action (prescription).
15.2012.50 · ti (Art. 292 cpv. 2 LEF)
Bankruptcy Office Supervision Appeal: Director Composition and Receivable Realization
Cited in the invocation list, this provision relates to the time limit for the clawback action concerning the postponed part of the credit, which triggers the procedural order in point 1.1.
CC.2008.95 · ne (Art. 292 al. 1 LP)
Creditor Revocation of Debtor's Employment Termination for Prejudice
The court used this provision to confirm that the time limit for filing the revocation action had not expired.
HG.2008.56 · sg (Art. 292 Ziff. 2 SchKG)
Clawback of Disguised Gift and Fraudulent Set-Off Against Successor Liability
Cited in the reasoning (but not the final operative part) concerning the limitation period for avoidance actions.
11 08 91 · lu (Art. 292 Ziff. 2 SchKG)
Appellant's Claim for Avoidance of Pre-Bankruptcy Asset Transfer Time-Barred
The appeal was granted because the claim for restitution in kind was deemed forfeited as it was not the primary claim filed within the two-year period.
AA060057 · zh (Art. 292 SchKG)
Appeal Regarding Cost Award Following Dismissal for Failure to Post Pre-Bankruptcy Claim Security
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the legal obligation to file the claim to avoid forfeiture, which relates to the procedural context but is not the main ground for the final decision on the appeal itself.
15.2012.50 · ti (art. 292 cpv. 2 LEF)
Creditor Appeal Against Bankruptcy Office Decisions on Subsidiary Board Removal and Subordinated Debt Realization
Cited in the preamble to the operative part, concerns the deadline for the clawback action (although the reasoning considered Art. 292 cpv. 1 ch. 2, the operative preamble cites Art. 292 cpv. 2).
LN100062 · zh (Art. 292 Ziff. 2 SchKG)
Appeal Regarding Denial of Free Legal Aid in Fraudulent Preference Action Based on Set-off Defense
Cited regarding the time limit for challenge proceedings in the context of legal assessment.