281.1
SCHKGLPLEF
CH
CH
Art. 288 Bundesgesetz vom 11. April 1889 über Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (SchKG)
SchKG; Zehnter Titel: Anfechtung ; B. Arten; 3. Absichtsanfechtung
Art. 288 SchKG
Anfechtbar sind endlich alle Rechtshandlungen, welche der Schuldner innerhalb der letzten fünf Jahre vor der Pfändung oder Konkurseröffnung in der dem andern Teile erkennbaren Absicht vorgenommen hat, seine Gläubiger zu benachteiligen oder einzelne Gläubiger zum Nachteil anderer zu begünstigen.
Bei der Anfechtung einer Handlung zugunsten einer nahestehenden Person des Schuldners trägt diese die Beweislast dafür, dass sie die Benachteiligungsabsicht nicht erkennen konnte. Als nahestehende Personen gelten auch Gesellschaften eines Konzerns.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (97)
A-1400/2016 (Art. 288 SchKG)
Mineral Oil Tax Repayment Claim Dismissed in Bankruptcy Proceedings
Determined that the OZD was not competent to rule on the paulian action.
RBOG.1994.Nr.9 · tg (Art. 288 i.V.m. Art. 285 Abs. 2 Ziff. 1 SchKG)
Asset Injunction vs. Third-Party Execution in Divorce Proceedings
Cited as the basis for a potential challenge action (Paulian-type action) if the appellant's claims remain unsatisfied after the seizure.
LB240058 · zh (Art. 288 SchKG)
Creditor Revokes Fraudulent Conveyances in Divorce Settlement
The court confirmed the lower court's decision based on the requirements of intent-based fraudulent conveyance (Absichtspauliana).
C/1833/2024 · ge (art. 288 LP)
Appeal Regarding Lifting of Precautionary Attachment on Funds Transferred to Switzerland
Cited in the reasoning to compare the ground under art. 271 al. 1 ch. 2 LP with the action paulienne.
C/11978/2022 · ge (Art. 288 al. 1 LP)
Creditor Challenges Donation as Fictitious Shield Against Seizure
Cited as a condition under which acts made within five years preceding attachment can be revoked if intended to prejudice creditors.
LP 24 29 · vs (art. 288 LP)
Appellant v. Supervisory Authority concerning Debt Discharge Action Abandonment and Fee Payment Deadline
Cited in the background facts (para 4.1) regarding the revocatory action proposed for creditor decision.
ZB.2023.51 · bs (Art. 288 Abs. 1 SchKG)
Revocation of Antecedent Property Gifts in Fraudulent Transfer Claim
Although the substantive merits were not fully examined, the court's decision to remand was based on overturning the lower court's finding regarding the inapplicability of Art. 288 SchKG due to the timing of the debt's creation, implying its potential relevance for the lower court's new decision.
A/3440/2023 · ge (art. 288 LP)
Creditor Challenge to Official Receiver's Inventory in Bankruptcy
This provision was mentioned in the reasoning regarding potential revocatory claims related to the wine stock and manager's salary payments, but it was not cited in the final orders.
ZK2 2022 44 · gr (Art. 288 SchKG)
Paulian Action over Transfer of Non-Operational Real Estate Assets Prior to Bankruptcy
The court partially upheld the appeal, confirming the decision that the asset transfer contract was voidable under this article (implied by the confirmation of the main ruling in Dispositive Ziffer 1).
C/3138/2020 · ge (art. 288 al. 1 LP)
Bankruptcy Estate v. Appellant Company: Preferential Transfer of Merchandise Stock
Cited in the reasoning (implied by the confirmation of the revocation order) as the legal basis for the act being revocable due to intent to favor certain creditors.
C/3138/2020 · ge (art. 288 al. 2 LP)
Bankruptcy Estate v. Appellant Company: Preferential Transfer of Merchandise Stock
Cited regarding the burden of proof for a close person concerning the non-recognition of fraudulent intent.
15.2023.11 · ti (art. 288 LEF)
Creditor Appeal Regarding Seizure of Disability Pension and Joint Income Calculation Upheld
Referenced in the reasoning (Point 10.2) regarding the 'suspicious period' for which the Executive Office may request information.
LP 23 9 · vs (art. 288 LP)
Appeal Regarding Provisional Real Estate Seizure Following Transfer to Children
The court based its decision to maintain the seizure on the revocability of the gratuitous transfer of assets made by the debtors, justified under this article.
C1 21 80 · vs (art. 288 LP)
Creditors' Claims Against Deceased's Successor Regarding Revocation of Donation and Repayment of Payment Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning regarding the revocation action concerning the payment, but not explicitly in the final orders regarding the merits or costs.
C1 21 80 · vs (art. 288 al. 1 LP)
Creditors' Claims Against Deceased's Successor Regarding Revocation of Donation and Repayment of Payment Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning regarding the conditions for revocation, but not explicitly in the final orders regarding the merits or costs.